<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Game 30: Mariners at Yankees</title>
	<atom:link href="http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2007/05/07/game-30-mariners-at-yankees/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2007/05/07/game-30-mariners-at-yankees/</link>
	<description>A New York Yankees blog by Chad Jennings and the staff of The Journal News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:03:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2B Ump Not Farnsworth Cost This Game</title>
		<link>http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2007/05/07/game-30-mariners-at-yankees/comment-page-2/#comment-39191</link>
		<dc:creator>2B Ump Not Farnsworth Cost This Game</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 02:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2007/05/07/game-30-mariners-at-yankees/#comment-39191</guid>
		<description>Hey TomP aka moron who didn&#039;t watch the game:

Farnsworth got the first two batters out in the 8th. He gave up an infield single to Vidro who was taken out of the game for pinch-runner Willie Bloomquist. Bloomquist stole second and was out BY A MILE. So out by a mile on the replay, his lead hand didn&#039;t even get past Cano&#039;s back foot, he was out by well over a foot. This cocksucker ump called him safe because someone in the Red Sox front office paid him to make a call like that -why not since a 2B umpire&#039;s main call is outs at 2B? Well, no fix just more awful umpiring like it&#039;s been since this decade began cuz I don&#039;t remember it being this bad in the &#039;80s or &#039;90s. Farnsworth gave up a hit which should&#039;ve never been given up...because the inning should&#039;ve been over before then, the ump cost the Yankees the game. That horrendous call is Exhibit A why M.L.B. should have instant replay.

Farnsworth, Posada, and Cano did their jobs, too bad the dick umpiring at 2B didn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey TomP aka moron who didn&#8217;t watch the game:</p>
<p>Farnsworth got the first two batters out in the 8th. He gave up an infield single to Vidro who was taken out of the game for pinch-runner Willie Bloomquist. Bloomquist stole second and was out BY A MILE. So out by a mile on the replay, his lead hand didn&#8217;t even get past Cano&#8217;s back foot, he was out by well over a foot. This cocksucker ump called him safe because someone in the Red Sox front office paid him to make a call like that -why not since a 2B umpire&#8217;s main call is outs at 2B? Well, no fix just more awful umpiring like it&#8217;s been since this decade began cuz I don&#8217;t remember it being this bad in the &#8217;80s or &#8217;90s. Farnsworth gave up a hit which should&#8217;ve never been given up&#8230;because the inning should&#8217;ve been over before then, the ump cost the Yankees the game. That horrendous call is Exhibit A why M.L.B. should have instant replay.</p>
<p>Farnsworth, Posada, and Cano did their jobs, too bad the dick umpiring at 2B didn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomP</title>
		<link>http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2007/05/07/game-30-mariners-at-yankees/comment-page-2/#comment-39101</link>
		<dc:creator>TomP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 01:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2007/05/07/game-30-mariners-at-yankees/#comment-39101</guid>
		<description>So, with Heredia gone, is Farnsworth officially the &quot;Run Fairy&quot; now?  G@d, how I hate seeing hime come into the game...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, with Heredia gone, is Farnsworth officially the &#8220;Run Fairy&#8221; now?  <a href="mailto:G@d">G@d</a>, how I hate seeing hime come into the game&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy</title>
		<link>http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2007/05/07/game-30-mariners-at-yankees/comment-page-2/#comment-39017</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 01:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2007/05/07/game-30-mariners-at-yankees/#comment-39017</guid>
		<description>They&#039;re putting a lot of balls in play, but he&#039;s pitched 7 innings of 3 hit 1 run ball.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re putting a lot of balls in play, but he&#8217;s pitched 7 innings of 3 hit 1 run ball.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nathan</title>
		<link>http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2007/05/07/game-30-mariners-at-yankees/comment-page-2/#comment-38960</link>
		<dc:creator>nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 00:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2007/05/07/game-30-mariners-at-yankees/#comment-38960</guid>
		<description>4 ground outs to 10 flyouts... are they hitting the ball hard.. thats very unhealthy ratio for Matt DeSalvo..

is he a fly ball pitcher</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>4 ground outs to 10 flyouts&#8230; are they hitting the ball hard.. thats very unhealthy ratio for Matt DeSalvo..</p>
<p>is he a fly ball pitcher</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sunny615</title>
		<link>http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2007/05/07/game-30-mariners-at-yankees/comment-page-2/#comment-38952</link>
		<dc:creator>sunny615</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 23:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2007/05/07/game-30-mariners-at-yankees/#comment-38952</guid>
		<description>How is DeSalvo doing?  For some reason, Yankee stadium provides no stats on Gameday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is DeSalvo doing?  For some reason, Yankee stadium provides no stats on Gameday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stuart</title>
		<link>http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2007/05/07/game-30-mariners-at-yankees/comment-page-2/#comment-38922</link>
		<dc:creator>stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 23:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2007/05/07/game-30-mariners-at-yankees/#comment-38922</guid>
		<description>I am at work, how does he look? How hard does he throw?

thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am at work, how does he look? How hard does he throw?</p>
<p>thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doreen</title>
		<link>http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2007/05/07/game-30-mariners-at-yankees/comment-page-2/#comment-38913</link>
		<dc:creator>Doreen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 23:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2007/05/07/game-30-mariners-at-yankees/#comment-38913</guid>
		<description>Larry --

I never, but never say nasty things on this blog.  But you have gone past what I think is common decency. It is offensive to me that you would call a person &quot;retarded&quot; because of his looks.  It is offensive that you would say that a person&#039;s worth is based on his looks.  You really don&#039;t have to be incredibly boorish to say that you think Igawa needs to work on his pitching.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Larry &#8211;</p>
<p>I never, but never say nasty things on this blog.  But you have gone past what I think is common decency. It is offensive to me that you would call a person &#8220;retarded&#8221; because of his looks.  It is offensive that you would say that a person&#8217;s worth is based on his looks.  You really don&#8217;t have to be incredibly boorish to say that you think Igawa needs to work on his pitching.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doreen</title>
		<link>http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2007/05/07/game-30-mariners-at-yankees/comment-page-2/#comment-38909</link>
		<dc:creator>Doreen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 22:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2007/05/07/game-30-mariners-at-yankees/#comment-38909</guid>
		<description>Russell --

I had to shut the t.v.  They were really getting to me.  they were obnoxious and abusive, AGAIN.  

Anyway, since Mike Francesa (whatever) was saying that Clemens was â€œawfulâ€? his last year with the Yankees (2003), I decided to look up the stats.

Now, playoffs aside, the man was 17-9 with a 3.91 ERA in the American League East. How is that even close to â€œawful?â€? Yet no one called in to quarrel with that. In Houston, he had ERAs of 2.98, 1.87, and 2.30. Even if you ADD 2 runs to that ERA, it will be 4.30, which in the AL East these days is not so bad. Plus, the Yankees are certainly capable of scoring the necessary 5 runs to cover. My guess is heâ€™ll be abaout the same as he was, around 4.

I think they just plainly do not like Clemens.  Did he &quot;dis&quot; them or something in the past????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russell &#8211;</p>
<p>I had to shut the t.v.  They were really getting to me.  they were obnoxious and abusive, AGAIN.  </p>
<p>Anyway, since Mike Francesa (whatever) was saying that Clemens was â€œawfulâ€? his last year with the Yankees (2003), I decided to look up the stats.</p>
<p>Now, playoffs aside, the man was 17-9 with a 3.91 ERA in the American League East. How is that even close to â€œawful?â€? Yet no one called in to quarrel with that. In Houston, he had ERAs of 2.98, 1.87, and 2.30. Even if you ADD 2 runs to that ERA, it will be 4.30, which in the AL East these days is not so bad. Plus, the Yankees are certainly capable of scoring the necessary 5 runs to cover. My guess is heâ€™ll be abaout the same as he was, around 4.</p>
<p>I think they just plainly do not like Clemens.  Did he &#8220;dis&#8221; them or something in the past????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2007/05/07/game-30-mariners-at-yankees/comment-page-2/#comment-38901</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 22:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2007/05/07/game-30-mariners-at-yankees/#comment-38901</guid>
		<description>RE: anything Igawa related

The guy looks terrible, lost, inconsistent, and mildly retarded.

In terms of the $50 million investment, I am not sure what logic went in to this.  You get the feeling that Yankee management was groping for the poor man&#039;s Matsuzaka at the time of bidding.  Ironic part is, NY is anything but poor.

Send his butt to Tampa, try to salvage something and correct his ridiculously bucked teeth, then hope he can return to the bullpen in July and spell relief for the overworked counterparts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: anything Igawa related</p>
<p>The guy looks terrible, lost, inconsistent, and mildly retarded.</p>
<p>In terms of the $50 million investment, I am not sure what logic went in to this.  You get the feeling that Yankee management was groping for the poor man&#8217;s Matsuzaka at the time of bidding.  Ironic part is, NY is anything but poor.</p>
<p>Send his butt to Tampa, try to salvage something and correct his ridiculously bucked teeth, then hope he can return to the bullpen in July and spell relief for the overworked counterparts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stormy</title>
		<link>http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2007/05/07/game-30-mariners-at-yankees/comment-page-2/#comment-38898</link>
		<dc:creator>Stormy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 22:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2007/05/07/game-30-mariners-at-yankees/#comment-38898</guid>
		<description>You guys are kidding yourselves if you don&#039;t think is an embarrassment.  They spent nearly fifty million dollars on this guy and he&#039;s back in A-ball!  Who cares if Matsuzaka is struggling?  The Yankees expected this guy to be their fifth starter and he can&#039;t even do that.

I&#039;m not overreacting -- this makes whoever signed Igawa look bad.  He&#039;s off the team after a month of baseball -- that&#039;s hardly a good return on an investment.

I think this is the right move.  Igawa has good stuff but he hasn&#039;t been all that effective.  Having him work out his issues away from the pressure of the big-league team is smart -- but the fact that he has to do that obviously means he&#039;s not the guy they thought they were getting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys are kidding yourselves if you don&#8217;t think is an embarrassment.  They spent nearly fifty million dollars on this guy and he&#8217;s back in A-ball!  Who cares if Matsuzaka is struggling?  The Yankees expected this guy to be their fifth starter and he can&#8217;t even do that.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not overreacting &#8212; this makes whoever signed Igawa look bad.  He&#8217;s off the team after a month of baseball &#8212; that&#8217;s hardly a good return on an investment.</p>
<p>I think this is the right move.  Igawa has good stuff but he hasn&#8217;t been all that effective.  Having him work out his issues away from the pressure of the big-league team is smart &#8212; but the fact that he has to do that obviously means he&#8217;s not the guy they thought they were getting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

