The LoHud Yankees Blog

A New York Yankees blog by Chad Jennings and the staff of The Journal News


Yankees take Brackman

Posted by: Peter Abraham - Posted in Misc on Jun 07, 2007 Print This Post Print This Post | Email This Post Email This Post

The Yankees took 6-10 Andrew Brackman of N.C. State. He’s a Boras client who had what was described as a “tired arm” this season that forced him to miss time.

Some believe that Boras invented that so his client would slide down to a team who could pay him over slot. Such a team would be the Yankees.

I don’t know anything about this guy at the moment. But I do know this: in the history of baseball, the only pitcher this tall who turrned out to be good was Randy Johnson. This kid is 6-10 and a lot can go wrong with your mechanics at that height.

Here is what Baseball America says about him:

As an awkward 6-foot-7 16-year-old at Cincinnati’s Moeller High, Brackman wasn’t considered a top 50 prospect in baseball or basketball. His basketball game blossomed as a senior, and when N.C. State offered him a chance to play both sports, he eagerly accepted.

A bout with tendinitis assured he wouldn’t be drafted highly enough out of high school to buy him out of college, and after giving up basketball as a sophomore (he had thrown just 77 innings in his first two years at N.C. State), he’s begun to come into this own.

Now a legitimate 6-foot-10, 240 pounds, his upside is considerable. His athleticism helps him repeat his delivery, but he struggles with his balance and release point, leading to erratic command, especially of his secondary stuff. He touched 99 mph in the Cape Cod League in 2006 and again during an early-season outing in Myrtle Beach, S.C., and he pitches at 94 with exceptional plane.

His mid-80s spike-curveball is filthy. Brackman’s changeup was the pitch that had improved the most this spring, and grades as a third potential plus offering. He’s still unrefined, but even without the polish, Brackman shouldn’t slide out of the top 10 picks.

 
 

Advertisement

174 Responses to “Yankees take Brackman”

  1. Skippy June 7th, 2007 at 5:15 pm

    I heard him compared to a better Chris Young, and that’s not too bad.

  2. Michael June 7th, 2007 at 5:16 pm

    I live with a kid at school who is close to Brackman and grew up with him, and after I told him I was unhappy the yanks drafted a pitcher who had arm problems in the past year, this is what he says to me ” Don’t worry, brackman has had arm problems since he was 14″. Great reassurance.

  3. christ June 7th, 2007 at 5:19 pm

    michael, tommy john and he will be fine.

  4. andrew June 7th, 2007 at 5:19 pm

    The yankees did not do their due diligence on this pick and it was a horrible selection. I would have taken smoker, arrieta, and especially harvey or a guy with no experience and injury problems. What a joke.

  5. andrew June 7th, 2007 at 5:20 pm

    P.s. That should be “over” not “or”

  6. Ryan June 7th, 2007 at 5:21 pm

    How about a pre-emptive TJ surgery and get it over with early?

  7. Josh June 7th, 2007 at 5:23 pm

    well this pick looks like itll suck

  8. Mo June 7th, 2007 at 5:23 pm

    Wow. The vitriol when most of us have never seen any of these guys is amazing. Look at all the guys they have picked the last few years. Hell, look at Joba. Im gonna trust the Yankee brass.

  9. Gibb June 7th, 2007 at 5:25 pm

    HAHA Shilling would have a perfect game through seven right now but Lugo has an error. Can’t wait to read about that one on 38bitches.com

    the good news is it’s 1-0. come on a’s!

  10. Alex June 7th, 2007 at 5:25 pm

    This is not a good selection. “Tremendous Upside Potential” is definitely the way to go in the first round, but this guy has no track record of CONSISTENLY good performance for a college pitcher (unlike joba chamberlain, and moreso ian kennedy. Even last year, his best year at NC State, he had control problems. Gammons compared this to the Chamberlain selection, but i think there are too many downsides here. He’ll have to work really hard to be able to have great command at the higher levels with his height (something that will cause problems with his release point). Unfortunately, scouts have questioned his attitude, committment, and work ethic. For someone like him, that does not bode well. Figure a relatively unproven track record, elbow issues, and this may be millions wasted down the road (not that that’s a significant problem for the Yankees). Nardi and Billy Connors sure got they work cut out for them; tall pitchers just have too many issues to draft THIS early (betances in the 8th round is more reasonable). mike pelfrey of the mets is a good example. It’s a pick in which everything will have to click for him to be a good starter. Good luck.

  11. Joe from Long Island June 7th, 2007 at 5:25 pm

    Mo – Lack of information or knowledge has never let some of these certified sub-geniuses give their expert opinions.

  12. Deep to Left June 7th, 2007 at 5:26 pm

    Man, the Yankees health problems really have infected every level of the organization. Today we draft a guy in the 1st round with potential arm trouble… then I read this…

    http://www.baseballamerica.com.....cts/?p=351

    “The rumor mill surrounds Yankees outfielder Jose Tabata yet again. Tabata, who has reportedly seen at least five different hand specialists in the past year to correct a cyst problem in his wrist according to several sources, missed time earlier this year and hasn’t played since June 3.”

  13. PA Mike June 7th, 2007 at 5:27 pm

    Changing speeds is great in a pitcher, but control is even better. Anyone can/should hit a 85 breaking pitch if it’s belt high. Please tell me deep down, this kid is future trade bait. Sorry to say, but this doesn’t look like the future.
    As for trusting the brass…Abreu,Vizcaino,Pavano….

    Forgive me for doubting oh so little…

  14. Jesse G. June 7th, 2007 at 5:27 pm

    All of you who are killing this pick really don’t know what you are talking about. The Yanks should always go for upside in the first round because they have the money to sign those guys. I like pitchers like Josh Smoker as much as the next guy but it is incredibly unlikely that he will ever become a top of the rotation guy which Brackman easily could.

    Also, elbow problems just really aren’t that big of a deal in the long run these days and neither is Tommy John.

  15. Dano June 7th, 2007 at 5:27 pm

    deep to left – thanks for your answer on the other entry. grateful, cheers.

  16. Mo June 7th, 2007 at 5:28 pm

    And i did not see one mock draft, not one, that had him dropping below 55, and most had him in the first. Not a reach in my book. Some of you act like you are looking at his medical and psych reports and have seen lots of tape. This is why televising the draft is silly. Most of us have never seen most of these guys, so we have no familiarity quotient, so how the hell can i really judge the picks.

  17. Joe from Long Island June 7th, 2007 at 5:29 pm

    Mo – That should have read “Lack of information or knowledge has never kept some of these certified sub-geniuses from giving their expert opinions.”

  18. the todd June 7th, 2007 at 5:30 pm

    nobody knows about harvey’s signability right now. hes commited to UNC so who knows, plus he might be around for our 2nd round pick (unlikely since boston picks twice before that) but i’m happy with this pick, he has a high 90′s fastball and nasty curveball. dont give up on this guy until he goes to tampa and works out with nardi.

  19. Mo June 7th, 2007 at 5:30 pm

    Exactly Jesse. Smoker is at best a 3-5 spot guy.

  20. Mo June 7th, 2007 at 5:30 pm

    Mets take harvey?

  21. Global Warming June 7th, 2007 at 5:30 pm

    Schilling is throwing a No Hitter through 7!

    Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

  22. Ben June 7th, 2007 at 5:30 pm

    I like taking a chance on him…..good investment.

    Now let’s see what we do later on…

  23. Mo June 7th, 2007 at 5:31 pm

    Or Sox.

  24. Mo June 7th, 2007 at 5:33 pm

    Mets picked a middle reliever at 42. Yanks taking a potential 1-2 at 30 doesnt look so bad. Harvey goes to Sox, i guess.

  25. PA Mike June 7th, 2007 at 5:34 pm

    Dear Global Warming:

    As the saying goes… “Even a blind squirrel finds a nut sometimes….”

    For the real “Southern” Yankee fans… .
    insert: “then we shoot said squirrel and boil him good…”

  26. Go NYR June 7th, 2007 at 5:35 pm

    A’s should be embarrassed, Schilling is awful

  27. Jesse G. June 7th, 2007 at 5:35 pm

    I do like the Brackman pick a lot. Still, I was so pumped for us to get Porcello. That guy is going to be a star, in my opinion. I knew the Tigers were going to pick him in the back of my mind but I had managed to convince myself that he would fall to the Yanks. Aargh!

  28. Dr. Acula June 7th, 2007 at 5:35 pm

    Broken mirror, walk under a ladder, step on a crack, shake hands w/ Bush.

    Jinx Schilling, Jinx!

  29. Go NYR June 7th, 2007 at 5:36 pm

    I cant believe Schilling is gonna pitch a no hitter!!!!

  30. the todd June 7th, 2007 at 5:36 pm

    PA mike … for the 1000th time, everyone wanted to sign pavano … so dont blame cashman because he has been injured … abrea was great last year, has been so so this year and looks to be breaking out of his horrible slump. as for vizcaino he was part of a trade to get RJ the hell out of NY. they were hoping for some guaranteed ML roster talent, thats all they can get, the trade was more of getting randy out of there than anything else … you must have seen him pitch in person before if you are stating that you dont think he’ll be the future at all … give me a break the scouts loved him, give him a chance before u rip the yanks draft.

  31. Adam June 7th, 2007 at 5:36 pm

    Completely blew this pick. Damon Oppenheimer should be fired tomorrow. That’s back to back awful first round picks.

  32. ivan June 7th, 2007 at 5:37 pm

    Yeah… there is a question that bothered me about perfect game for a while…
    The rule says that a perfect game happens when a pitcher retires 27 batters in order.
    So let’s suppose that an error occurred on throw to first base, and there is a baserunner on first, and then the next batter induced a DP which wipes out the runner on first, and the pitcher goes on and retires the rest of the batter.. Doest that still count as a Perfect Game? Or just a No-Hitter?

    btw… i do think that the whole draft on TV thing is a joke simply because the probability that a draft pick become everyday player is pretty low…

  33. Global Warming June 7th, 2007 at 5:38 pm

    Schilling no hitter though 8.

    Damn…now we are going to hear about this for weeks now.

  34. PA Mike June 7th, 2007 at 5:38 pm

    Allow me to be the first to state, this kid will never pitch in the major leagues with an Yankee uniform.

  35. MIke R. June 7th, 2007 at 5:39 pm

    We don’t even have a medical report on this kid and you guys have already set up an appointment with Dr. James Andrews and have him on a plane to Birmingham. I assume some medical investigation takes place with the scouting process.

  36. Adam June 7th, 2007 at 5:41 pm

    He’s all potential and has never shown anything over an extended period of time in college. He was hurt earlier this year and was terrible and throwing in the 80s when he came back. There was absolutely no reason not to pick Matt Harvey. Especially, when both guys will have big, ridiculous bonus demands.

  37. mel June 7th, 2007 at 5:41 pm

    That Schilling. Such a topper. Had to outpitch Wang.

  38. Mo June 7th, 2007 at 5:41 pm

    Kennedy was a terrible pick? really?

  39. MIke R. June 7th, 2007 at 5:41 pm

    Adam-

    You think Ian Kennedy was a terrible first round pick? If you do who do you think we should have taken?

  40. ????? June 7th, 2007 at 5:41 pm

    “Completely blew this pick. Damon Oppenheimer should be fired tomorrow. That’s back to back awful first round picks.”

    A. Based on what information?
    B. Oh yeah, Ian Kennedy and Joba Chamberlain were just *terrible* picks. What could Cashman have been thinking?

    Please stop polluting the website with nonsense.

  41. Go NYR June 7th, 2007 at 5:42 pm

    its a no-hitter. A runner can not reach base

  42. Deep to Left June 7th, 2007 at 5:42 pm

    Ivan,

    27 up, 27 down. Doesn’t matter if the pitcher just faces the minimum number of batters. He has to retire 27 men in a row to qualify for a perfect game.

  43. Mo June 7th, 2007 at 5:42 pm

    Mets pass on Harvey again. Something must be up, hes going to school.

  44. Emobacca June 7th, 2007 at 5:43 pm

    Adam, you are obviously retarded

    How the hell are Ian Kennedy, Joba Chamberlain, and Brackman bad 1st rounders. Please show me the proof you have of that

  45. chazz h June 7th, 2007 at 5:43 pm

    “That’s back to back awful first round picks.”- Adam

    Ian Kennendy was a bad pick last year? are you crazy? The only way you would say that is if you were the fan of another team- he will be in the bigs next year.

  46. Go NYR June 7th, 2007 at 5:43 pm

    Schilling is gonna pitch a no hitter. Will it be his first?

  47. Adam June 7th, 2007 at 5:43 pm

    Kennedy has a very low ceiling and carried a hefty bonus. We should have taken a guy with more upside last year and taken advantage of being the Yankees. Joba Chamberlain saved last years draft.

  48. MIke R. June 7th, 2007 at 5:44 pm

    Emobacca-

    Retarded people everywhere are offended that you just compared them to adam. I demand an apology on their behalf.

  49. no comment June 7th, 2007 at 5:44 pm

    I was really hoping to see Marco Scutaro hit a HR off of him to break it up…

  50. God Save the Yankees June 7th, 2007 at 5:45 pm

    Schilling, ” I want my big, fat extension now! “

  51. Jeff NJ June 7th, 2007 at 5:46 pm

    Wow, this has got to be the most negative response to a player almost no one here has ever heard of or saw pitch. I think a lot of the bad feeling is his height, the last pitcher that height on the Yankees left us all with a bad taste. I do however trust that the Yankees know what they are doing draft wise at this point. Hopefully he’ll rise as fast as last year’s first pick, now AA pitcher Ian Kennedy.

  52. MIke R. June 7th, 2007 at 5:46 pm

    Adam-

    I haven’t read a name yet. Who is this person with a higher ceiling we should have taken?

  53. Michael June 7th, 2007 at 5:47 pm

    i hate schilling , i hope someone bunts like ben davis did

  54. Jason T June 7th, 2007 at 5:47 pm

    i out left for schilling

    LETS GO A’s
    DON’T LET THIS HAPPEN!!!!!!!! PLEASE

  55. Go NYR June 7th, 2007 at 5:47 pm

    yes!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111111

  56. Michael June 7th, 2007 at 5:47 pm

    YEAHHHHH WOOOOOOOOO

  57. Michael June 7th, 2007 at 5:48 pm

    now let’s get that runner in

  58. pat m June 7th, 2007 at 5:48 pm

    Brackman is just a dynamite pick…..He’ll spend very little time in A Ball….There’s just a waelth of upside …Better yet The Chill just gave up a 2 out hit in the 9th ( stewart )

  59. Ryan June 7th, 2007 at 5:48 pm

    I LOVE SHANNON STEWART

  60. Jason T June 7th, 2007 at 5:48 pm

    yessssssssssssssss
    thank you thank you

  61. Buddy Biancalana June 7th, 2007 at 5:48 pm

    Shannon Stewart MVP MVP MVP

  62. BX 12 Fordham Road June 7th, 2007 at 5:48 pm

    HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!

  63. Andrew June 7th, 2007 at 5:48 pm

    HAHAHAHA I loved how he was smirking when the inning started. He’s such a loser.

  64. MIke R. June 7th, 2007 at 5:48 pm

    Go Shannon Stewart!!!!! My new favorite noon-yankee!!!!!

  65. Jason T June 7th, 2007 at 5:48 pm

    hit it out
    hit it out
    hit it out
    hit it out

    SOX LOSSSSSSSSSSE

  66. Nick B. June 7th, 2007 at 5:48 pm

    Thats the 2nd time I have turned on a no hitter this year to watch the next batter break it up.

  67. God Save the Yankees June 7th, 2007 at 5:48 pm

    all right!!!!!!!!
    the “Carl Everett” spirit is still alive!!!!!
    Pay back for Mussina circa 2001.

  68. Wolf In Pinstripes June 7th, 2007 at 5:49 pm

    OK, Stewart has broken up Schilling’s no-hit bid with one out to go. Can we drop talking about the jerk now? LOL :D

  69. Adam June 7th, 2007 at 5:49 pm

    Kennedy has crap stuff. He’s getting AA and A hitters out because he’s polished and has good command. That stuff isn’t going to fly when he gets to the bigs. He’s a back of the rotation starter at best. If you guys can’t see that then you’re just being homers.

  70. Buddy Biancalana June 7th, 2007 at 5:49 pm

    Sweep woulda been sweet!

  71. ????? June 7th, 2007 at 5:49 pm

    “Kennedy has a very low ceiling and carried a hefty bonus.”

    A. Low ceiling? Really? Yeah, he sure sucked up A ball this year and had to be sent to AA. What do you base the evaluation of low ceiling on, other than your own inferiority complex/agression?
    B. Hefty bonus? Who cares. Thats the point — the Yankees can get really good people lowerdown with $$.

    Please go away.

  72. ivan June 7th, 2007 at 5:49 pm

    Deep to Left, thank ya~
    Anyways… the additional reason why i think the draft is bad.. is because the draftees do not make impact immediately when they are drafted. Unlike NBA and NFL… it usually take them 5~6 yrs and go thru all the minor league and build themselves up.

    And… Ya! Big clown lost his no-hit bid!! ^_^

  73. Rey22 June 7th, 2007 at 5:49 pm

    Love Shannon Stewart.

  74. Jason T June 7th, 2007 at 5:49 pm

    damn, sox win

  75. Adam June 7th, 2007 at 5:50 pm

    For those that are wondering, I would have taken Pedro Beato last year.

  76. YanksFanLV June 7th, 2007 at 5:50 pm

    Thank the good Lord for Shannon Stewart, I wouldn’t be able to deal with Schilling if he threw a no hitter.

  77. Mo June 7th, 2007 at 5:52 pm

    One minute, Adam, so last year they should have taken a bigger upside guy and flex their Yankee muscles. But this year, that is apparently a problem, because that is what they just did.
    And Kennedy has very good stuff, great control and makeup.

  78. Global Warming June 7th, 2007 at 5:52 pm

    Shades of Carl Everett.

  79. Dr. Acula June 7th, 2007 at 5:53 pm

    I wanna thank everyone for helping me put the *HEX* and “BOJO* on Schilling.

    Oh, the power of our Blog!!!!

    *YES*

  80. Adam June 7th, 2007 at 5:53 pm

    They took an injury prone guy that is 100% upside. Matt Harvey should have been the pick.

  81. MIke R. June 7th, 2007 at 5:53 pm

    Adam-

    All I want is the name of a player that was selected after Kennedy that you believe is better. If Kennedy is as bad as you say he is it shouldn’t be difficult.

  82. UNCYankee June 7th, 2007 at 5:54 pm

    Brackman is a good pitcher and athlete. I watched him play basketball for NC State against my Heels many times and he is a very athletic guy. He will probably make a decent player one day. Of course, drafting baseball players is much harder than football or basketball. You just never know what you are going to get.

  83. Adam June 7th, 2007 at 5:54 pm

    No one likes this pick.

    Kevin Goldstein (2:04:02 PM PST): The Yankees finish up the first round by taking Andrew Brackman. Maybe the Oliver Stone theories were correct, and it really was a big ol’ orchestration to drop him to the Yankees — and maybe not. I don’t think I like the pick, even at 30.

    BSmith (2:05:35 PM PST): He’s fun to watch pitch, I know, but at some point, the results have to matter. The consistency isn’t there, the dominance has never been there, and earlier in the year, I wrote about his struggles against 1-5 hitters in the ACC. He is probably going to do well in the low minors, if he’s healthy, but I don’t see him having much more success than Jon Rauch.

  84. Magic Number June 7th, 2007 at 5:56 pm

    No no-no but it is down to 93

  85. Deep to Left June 7th, 2007 at 5:57 pm

    Brackman.

    Sheesh.

    I blame A-Rod.

  86. Mo June 7th, 2007 at 6:01 pm

    2 guys for Baseball prospectus are not everyone. BP had Brackman going 55. How bad can they think he is. And Boston just passed on Harvey too to take another reliever. Relax.

  87. Emobacca June 7th, 2007 at 6:03 pm

    Harvey must have told everyone he is going to school

  88. chazz h June 7th, 2007 at 6:03 pm

    EVERYBODY on ESPN ‘loved’ the pick.

  89. Adam June 7th, 2007 at 6:06 pm

    The guy got a “tired arm” after 78 innings. Pick is a disaster.

  90. SPARKY O June 7th, 2007 at 6:06 pm

    ANYONE FIND IT FUNNY THE SOX DRAFTED A KID NAMED DENT IN THE SECOND ROUND….

  91. Mo June 7th, 2007 at 6:06 pm

    This is BP’s listing *before* the draft for Brackman.
    *30*. Andrew Brackman, RHP, North Carolina State
    Pros: The six-foot-11 righthander has touched 99 mph in the past, and arguably has a higher ceiling than any player in the draft; curveball flashes as plus at times; mechanics are surprisingly refined for a player with his size and lack of experience.
    Cons: Rarely pitched as freshman or sophomore because of a basketball commitment, then was practically shut down after 78 innings due to a tired arm; before the shutdown, he became less and less effective as season wore on.

  92. MIke R. June 7th, 2007 at 6:07 pm

    Matt Harvey is officially unsignable. There is no other explination.

  93. mel June 7th, 2007 at 6:07 pm

    You guys are so funny. Baseball America loves him, the Yankees obviously like him. Gammons, Phillips, and Law were choking on their own vomit as they gave kudos to the Yankees for the great pick. But the scouts here don’t like it. Too funny.

  94. Mo June 7th, 2007 at 6:07 pm

    People get tired arms all the time. Please.

  95. cult of basebaal June 7th, 2007 at 6:08 pm

    2006 Rule 4 Draft write-up on Ian Kennedy from Baseball America:

    At his best, Kennedy pitches off his fastball despite a short frame and shows a knack for making the big pitch. Above-average fastball command has allowed him to dominate college hitters (as evidenced by a 158-38 strikeout-walk ratio in 2005) and in two summers with Team USA. Kennedy has regressed in 2006, however, becoming much more hittable (.254 average against versus .201 last year) and vulnerable to big innings. Scouts report Kennedy’s fastball sits more frequently from 86-89 mph, rather than 89-92 as in the past. Even when he has his velocity Kennedy has missed his spots, leaving balls up in the zone, and his changeup–a plus pitch in the past–has taken a step back as well. His slurvy breaking ball needs to be tighter and find the strike zone more often. Complicating matters, agent Scott Boras represents Kennedy. Scouts can’t agree where he merits being picked but share the belief it will take the right fit of a scout who has followed him since he starred with Rockies prospect Ian Stewart in high school, and an organization comfortable with his size and adviser

  96. Reno June 7th, 2007 at 6:11 pm

    “You guys are so funny. Baseball America loves him, the Yankees obviously like him. Gammons, Phillips, and Law were choking on their own vomit as they gave kudos to the Yankees for the great pick. But the scouts here don’t like it. Too funny.”

    Baseball America loveD him. Gammons, Phillips, and Law are not draft experts and have no idea what they’re talking about.

  97. Reno June 7th, 2007 at 6:11 pm

    “People get tired arms all the time. Please.”

    Not so bad where they can’t return to pitch for the rest of the season.

  98. Reno June 7th, 2007 at 6:12 pm

    “Scouts report Kennedy’s fastball sits more frequently from 86-89 mph, rather than 89-92 as in the past. Even when he has his velocity Kennedy has missed his spots, leaving balls up in the zone, and his changeup-a plus pitch in the past-has taken a step back as well. His slurvy breaking ball needs to be tighter and find the strike zone more often.”

    That’s top of the line stuff right there!

  99. Mo June 7th, 2007 at 6:14 pm

    Ok, Dr. Reno and Dr. Adam, im so upset that the Yankees did not have access to the medical reports of you guys. I cant believe that they didnt know about the tired arm and 78 innings. You guys are totally right, so negligent.

  100. Mo June 7th, 2007 at 6:15 pm

    Reno, every scouting publication has Kennedy shooting up their lists right now, you are looking at old stuff. Why not dig up his little league numbers.

  101. Wang/Schilling/Pettitte/Hughes/Mussina in 2008 June 7th, 2007 at 6:17 pm

    Hey if Boston doesn’t want to re-sign Schilling for next year, I’d gladly welcome him to the 2008 Yankees rotation which would be Wang/ Schilling/ Pettitte probably returning for his free $16M i.e. $16M player’s option for 2008/ Hughes/ Mussina. The great thing about this rotation would be the enormous flexibility the Yanks would have with three starters being off the books after next year: Schilling (probably retires after ’08), Pettitte (ditto), and Mussina
    (let him go). $13M + $16.M + $11.5M = $40M cleared for Johann Santana and Dontrelle Willis in ’09 (Santana/ Wang/
    Willis/ Hughes/ whoever). The Yanks could sign Santana and Willis to 7 years, $119M, and $17M/yr. each so they cost $34M for’08 combined and the Yanks would have $6M left over
    to sign a Paul Byrd-like veteran if not Byrd himself or go with another kid from the farm system (Ian Kennedy?)

    If the Yanks offered Schilling a year and $13M, what he’s making this year, he’d take it despite all his anti-Yankee nonsense cuz money talks, bullshit walks. He’d cost the Yanks practically nothing because $9M will be off the books from the Yanks no longer having to pay Jaret Wright, Javier Vasquez, or Randy Johnson (i.e. they’re making $4M, $3M, and $2M respectively from the Yanks this year). They let go of Vizcaino, that’s another $3M cleared. They let go of Jose Veras who hasn’t pitched for the ’07 Yanks yet, that’s another $400K cleared, so 2008 Schilling costs the Yanks only $600K ($13M – $12.4M)!!!

  102. chazz h June 7th, 2007 at 6:30 pm

    Hopefully Harvey slips to the Yanks in round 2.

  103. Mo June 7th, 2007 at 6:32 pm

    Mets have to take him at 77, right?

  104. mark June 7th, 2007 at 6:34 pm

    Remember, prior to his rather “average” junior year Ian Kennedy was considered one of the BEST college pitchers ever. He was mentioned as a possible top pick prior to his ’06 season. I think the Yanks did just fine in getting him in the mid-twenties last year.

  105. Kevin June 7th, 2007 at 6:37 pm

    Harvey is still around after 76 picks

  106. Tak June 7th, 2007 at 6:37 pm

    How about Ohka, who has just been released from the Blue Jays. He can be a long man/starter, and an extra arm may come in handy later this season.

  107. Kevin June 7th, 2007 at 6:38 pm

    Mets just passed Harvey at #77

  108. ????? June 7th, 2007 at 6:41 pm

    Cult of baseball was trying to show Adam the Great GM that write-ups are often wrong and that the Yankees went against one “expert” evaluation. But Adam the Great GM prefers to litter the blog with his opinions

  109. Ben June 7th, 2007 at 6:41 pm

    Would Harvey sign if he is picked in round 2, cuz its kind of a slap to the face since he is much better than that. Would he just go to college to try to become a better pick next year?

  110. pat m June 7th, 2007 at 6:41 pm

    Anytime there’s a guy who jugs it @ 98 , has above average secondary pitches, you have to give him serious consideration….He fell because of $$$ more than anything else….Think of him as a super-sized Justin Verlander….. As for Ian Kennedy, Yanks have him on the fast track….Maybe it’s to display him before the trade deadline….Adam, make no mistake, You’ll be paying to see him sometime in 08…Maybe not in the Bronx, but somewhere maybe Texas….I’ve seen him at every level, he’s # 3 rotation good…..As much as I like Clippard, Ian will by pass him by the time the new park is opened……Just an opinion….

  111. Ben June 7th, 2007 at 6:42 pm

    I think the Red Sox will take him at 85

  112. Chicago Dave June 7th, 2007 at 6:42 pm

    I guess the Yanks just think a young pitcher won’t “mature” properly until he has TJ surgery…First Humberto Sanchez and now Brackman will be next…bank on it. Taking a guy that tall with elbow problems is moronic… The next Randy Johnson he isn’t!

  113. Mo June 7th, 2007 at 6:45 pm

    Ahhh, we missed the negativity out of Chicago.

  114. Andrew June 7th, 2007 at 6:46 pm

    Ben,

    I’m with you. Red Sox will take him with their second round pick.

    So glad Fat Schill didn’t get a no hitter. Nice job by the A’s, by the way — the guy threw only 100 pitches in throwing a complete game one hitter. Nice patience.

  115. Chicago Dave June 7th, 2007 at 6:46 pm

    Mo: Awww,thanks…It’s so great to know I was missed!!!

  116. jerkface June 7th, 2007 at 6:46 pm

    anyone will sign for the right price, and Sox just passed up harvey.

    If Yanks take Harvey at 92 , and we get Brackman AND Harvey, its a win.

  117. Nick B. June 7th, 2007 at 6:46 pm

    No dice. Sox passed too.

  118. Nick B. June 7th, 2007 at 6:47 pm

    Do you take him and take the risk of him not signing? I would

  119. Ben June 7th, 2007 at 6:47 pm

    There has to be something wrong with Harvey that us fans dont know about. No way the Mets and Red Sox pass up on him twice. Now I have the feeling that he will be available for the Yankees but pass up on him, too.

  120. Mo June 7th, 2007 at 6:48 pm

    If Mets and Detroit pass, Yanks will have their chance. If they dont, its obvious hes not gonna sign.

  121. Ben June 7th, 2007 at 6:49 pm

    Or Detroit will take him and snag both Porcello and Harvey from the Yanks.

  122. Chicago Dave June 7th, 2007 at 6:50 pm

    Couldn’t the Yanks benefit by trying to get a decent position prospect instead of targeting all pitching?

  123. Mo June 7th, 2007 at 6:50 pm

    Does detroit have the money for both?

  124. Andrew June 7th, 2007 at 6:51 pm

    Mo –

    Agreed. Also agreed it will be a win if Yankees get both.

  125. Mo June 7th, 2007 at 6:51 pm

    I think its much easier to sign positional free agents. Young pitching is much rarer. And more tradeable if you need to make moves.

  126. Mo June 7th, 2007 at 6:52 pm

    And this happens to be a very shallow and weak position player draft.

  127. Ben June 7th, 2007 at 6:53 pm

    Chicago Dave, the Yanks like to get good pitching in the draft first because pitching is such a scarce commodity in today’s world. Normally, they just end up trading these pitchers for position players (i.e. Abreu)

  128. Chicago Dave June 7th, 2007 at 6:55 pm

    I would still rather have a balance of prospects in the minors rather than putting all our eggs in the pitching basket. When you have injuries during the season, it’s much easier to call up a minor league player than trying to scramble to make a trade. Having some decent positional players to call up would be a great help… As I think we have witnessed this year, especially.

  129. Mo June 7th, 2007 at 6:56 pm

    Agreed. im not saying i entirely agree with the philosophy of the Yankees, but I think it makes sense.

  130. Ben June 7th, 2007 at 6:57 pm

    Dave, I agree with you, but sadly, Im not Brian Cashman

  131. Nick B. June 7th, 2007 at 6:57 pm

    Chicago Dave

    I think that the team is taking the mentality of building the staff through the minor league system and the line up through free agency. There aren’t many good position players in our minor league system. I think taking the best player available leads them to taking a lot of pitchers also.

  132. Ben June 7th, 2007 at 6:57 pm

    They are up next

  133. Mo June 7th, 2007 at 6:57 pm

    Heres the chance.

  134. Ben June 7th, 2007 at 6:58 pm

    Passed on him again!

  135. Mo June 7th, 2007 at 6:59 pm

    Obviously Harvey is not going to sign.

  136. StandingO'Neil June 7th, 2007 at 6:59 pm

    Harvey is gonna slip real late, looks as if he will go to college

  137. Nick B. June 7th, 2007 at 6:59 pm

    Now can you give the organization a break for not taking him at 30. You guys overreact like crazy

  138. Mo June 7th, 2007 at 7:00 pm

    Hitting Ability: Romine used to change his approach nearly every game, making it hard to get a proper evaluation. But he seems to have settled on an erect stace with his hands set low. He consistently makes hard contact.
    Power: With a Todd Zeile type of approach, Romine has some legitimate power potential. He doubled in the game against Lakewood.
    Running Speed: He’s a below-average runner.
    Arm Strength: Romine has a well above-average arm, falling in the plus to plus-plus category.
    Arm Accuracy: Runners don’t test him because of his arm strength, but he’s accurate as well.
    Fielding: Romine is inconsistent behind the plate. At times, he looks like he’s got good hands and belongs back there. Other times, he looks more like a first baseman.
    Range: Again, inconsistent. Sometimes he looks live and active, sometimes he appears limited and slow.
    Baseball Instinct: The son of former big leaguer Kevin Romine and the younger brother of ASU starter Andrew, Romine grew up around baseball and has plus instincts.
    Physical Description: Romine lost quite a bit of weight since last summer and fall and has added strength, profiling as a strong, offensive-minded catcher.
    Medical Update: Healthy.
    Strengths: His ability to make contact. Romine makes hard contact consistently with power to all fields.
    Weaknesses: Inconsistencies with his glove. While Romine has a plus arm behind the plate, the other aspects of his defensive game are not always on display.
    Summary: Romine hasn’t always played scout league ball, limiting how often he’s been seen outside of the regular season. Though he’s been tough to evaluate in the past because of an ever-changing offensive approach, he’s settled in and has shown good hitting potential to go along with a strong throwing arm. The only question is if Kevin’s son will go pro or follow his brother’s path and head to ASU.

  139. Ben June 7th, 2007 at 7:00 pm

    Scouting report sounds similar to Posada: good contact hitter, bad runner, strong arm, some power, etc.

  140. Chicago Dave June 7th, 2007 at 7:02 pm

    I’m not saying I don’t like good young pitching talent…Who in their right mind would quibble with getting good young pitching prospects? I just think that we already had a pitching-heavy draft last year, so it would be nice to see some position guys sprinkled in there this year. Still, if the talent just isn’t there to be taken in this year’s crop, then I guess that kills the balance theory…

    Regardless, I’m just a little tired of seeing the Yanks go for guys with arm trouble – whether they’re young (like Sanchez, Brackman) or old (like Pavano, Wright). Go for guys with good mechanics and no history of arm trouble…That’s what I’d love to see!

  141. Ari June 7th, 2007 at 7:03 pm

    The funny thing is that BP said the Yankees had a horrible draft last year,but the draft was a large reason their farm went to #7 on BA’s chart.They got the best 2 relievers in the draft with Melancon and Robertson, and two guys that were top 10 pitchers in draft with Chamberlain and Bettances,and a safe pick in Kennedy. The Yankees got ripped by those two guys from BP then and now the same is happening.Brackman was the best player available at 30 and has one of the highest ceilings in the draft,and his lack of experience could work in the Yankees favor.It gives Nardi Conteras an easier time to right his mechanics because his bad habits will be easier to kick.And he walks in with a crazy fastball and a plus curve with a change on the way.Brackman might have the best stuff in the farm system,actually he most likely does.

  142. Mo June 7th, 2007 at 7:03 pm

    I bet the Angels take Harvey at 118, they havent picked yet and have the money, they can look at like a first rounder.

  143. Chicago Dave June 7th, 2007 at 7:04 pm

    Aha…My prayers answered! Yanks were sorely in need of a decent catching prospect…

  144. pat m June 7th, 2007 at 7:06 pm

    They call it baseball, however you can make a case for calling it pitchball….Do some quick math, how much $$$ have the Yanks spent on FA pitching compared to position players…Let’s go back since 2000….Remember the Mattingly, Winfield, Henederson teams of the 80′s…Great lineup, shit pitching……

  145. Mo June 7th, 2007 at 7:06 pm

    Another reliever for the Mets. They must be really down on Heilman, lol.

  146. StandingO'Neil June 7th, 2007 at 7:07 pm

    Just for anyone who wants to read something optimistic, here is Keith Law’s review of Brackman…

    Brackman’s a very tall, athletic, ex-basketball player with fairly clean arm action and a basically sound delivery. He has a superior fastball that could eventually overpower major league hitters. His power curveball will be an out-pitch to both righties and lefties. He shouldn’t be rushed. Everything will improve with instruction and innings now that he is concentrating full time on baseball. He has a speciall arm with the chance to become a No. 1 starter, or at worst a No. 3.

  147. Ben June 7th, 2007 at 7:08 pm

    Harvey might still be available at pick 124, LOL

  148. Mo June 7th, 2007 at 7:10 pm

    How dare Keith Law be high on Brackman. Our resident scouts and doctors dont like the pick.

  149. chazz h June 7th, 2007 at 7:11 pm

    Yanks Lineup tonight

    Damon dh
    Cabrera cf
    Abreu rf
    A Rod 3b
    Matsui lf
    Cano 2b
    Phelps 1b
    Cairo ss
    Nieves c

    no jeter, no posada….. hopefully Moose gives the Yanks a good effort.

  150. StandingO'Neil June 7th, 2007 at 7:12 pm

    Hey can anyone direct me to a website or link that has all the upcoming draft picks. Like who is picking when and during which round, thanks.

  151. StandingO'Neil June 7th, 2007 at 7:13 pm

    Lucroy, Jonathan
    Comments: Lucroy is a pretty good, if lesser-known, all-around catching prospect. He has a good line-drive stroke and has the chance to hit for average with some pop. Defensively, he is a natural leader who throws extremely well. Those who look for college catching in this draft should surely take a look at Lucroy.

    Hmm, I hope the yankees took a long look at this guy before they selected Romine

  152. Chicago Dave June 7th, 2007 at 7:14 pm

    Still, I think Pete’s point was a valid one…How many pitchers that tall have made a true impact in the big leagues? Johnson is honestly the only one that comes to my mind as well… With a body that long and lanky, there’s plenty of opportunity for the mechanics to become inconsistent, and, in so doing, take that sore elbow even further.

  153. Greg June 7th, 2007 at 7:16 pm

    “Hey can anyone direct me to a website or link that has all the upcoming draft picks. Like who is picking when and during which round, thanks.”

    mlb.com has a draft tracker plus video coverage.

  154. StandingO'Neil June 7th, 2007 at 7:16 pm

    Its a valid point by Pete. But with baseball you just never know. We are already defying the odds with Wang, seeing as no pitcher in history has had long term success with such a low K/9 rate. So maybe Brackman can break the trend too, we’ll just have to wait and see.

  155. hmmm June 7th, 2007 at 7:17 pm

    “Kennedy has a very low ceiling and carried a hefty bonus. We should have taken a guy with more upside last year and taken advantage of being the Yankees. Joba Chamberlain saved last years draft.”

    seriously you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.

    Betances, Robertson, McAllister, Chamberlain, Kennedy, Kontos, Hilligloss, McCutchen, Melancon

    you are embarrassing yourself.

  156. Greg June 7th, 2007 at 7:17 pm

    “Still, I think Pete’s point was a valid one…How many pitchers that tall have made a true impact in the big leagues?”

    Chris Young is also 6′ 10″. There are some other guys who are 6′ 8″ or so who have success and that’s not all that much shorter.

  157. hmmm June 7th, 2007 at 7:18 pm

    “How many pitchers that tall have made a true impact in the big leagues? Johnson is honestly the only one that comes to my mind as well…”

    Chris Young

  158. Chicago Dave June 7th, 2007 at 7:18 pm

    So, what will the Yanks take next…another pitcher? What does everyone think?

  159. Chicago Dave June 7th, 2007 at 7:19 pm

    OK, I’ll give you all Chris Young!

  160. Pablo June 7th, 2007 at 7:22 pm

    124 and add 30 to that for every round.

  161. StandingO'Neil June 7th, 2007 at 7:22 pm

    I’m not agreeing with outspoken fools like Andrew, but the word from scouts on Kennedy is he will most likely be a back of the rotation starter.

    Now I do love to read scouts opinions, but I’ve always gone by the belief of I’ll believe what I see on the field. Kennedy may not project to be a frontline starter, but so far he’s doing pretty well. Who knows maybe he really harnessed his skills and learned to pitch effectively. Or maybe he’s just benefiting from lesser competition.

    Either way I’m glad he is succeeding, and with so a low percentage of even first rounders who do anything in the majors, if Kennedy can contribute at all I’d say it was a good pick.

    If you go by the Moneyball philosophy a guy like JD Drew would be in the hall of fame and Tom Glavine wouldn’t. What I always liked about write up’s on Kennedy is it said he has the ability to make a big pitch.

  162. hmmm June 7th, 2007 at 7:22 pm

    “The funny thing is that BP said the Yankees had a horrible draft last year,but the draft was a large reason their farm went to #7 on BA’s chart”

    i would love to see a link to this, but if i recall at the time it was largely a consensus that the yankees and the red sox had the 2 best drafts.

  163. StandingO'Neil June 7th, 2007 at 7:25 pm

    i would love to see a link to this, but if i recall at the time it was largely a consensus that the yankees and the red sox had the 2 best drafts.

    According to the 2007 prospect handbook the yankees draft was one of the best. The redsox did have the best draft, but the yankees took some high ceiling guys later on which really rose their draft stock.

  164. StandingO'Neil June 7th, 2007 at 7:27 pm

    Check out the video on Brock Huntzinger the latest red sox pick. He’s wearing a yankee jersey on the mound, mildly amusing.

  165. Mo June 7th, 2007 at 7:27 pm

    I called it.

  166. Mo June 7th, 2007 at 7:27 pm

    Harvey to the Angels.

  167. Ari June 7th, 2007 at 7:35 pm

    Goldstein was negative about are draft right after it happened.Many people at NYYforums will corroborate that story as well.He trashed the draft and the Kennedy pick initially.And our draft looks like it was better than the Red Sox draft at the moment given how our guys have performed better than theirs.

  168. Ryan June 7th, 2007 at 7:37 pm

    Yankees drafted Pope

    I didn’t realize he was a baseball player:)

  169. Mo June 7th, 2007 at 7:38 pm

    And Bard has looked terrible, he was their big coup last year.

  170. StandingO'Neil June 7th, 2007 at 7:38 pm

    Sweet potential artsy guy in the clubhouse, lol

  171. GuidryBall June 7th, 2007 at 7:40 pm

    Good call Mo

    Harvey to Angels. Is he hellbent on going to college or are the Sox & Yanks missing the boat. I wanted Harvey over the much more risky Brackman.

  172. Ari June 7th, 2007 at 7:41 pm

    Ryan Pope:Tiny Savannah College of Art and Design produced the state’s biggest riser among college prospects, as Ryan Pope came out this season throwing well, racking up a 40-3 strikeout-walk ratio in his first 25 innings. He has a prototypical pitcher’s body and athleticism, which enables him to repeat his delivery. His fastball was up to 90-93 mph early in the season, though his velocity fell off as the season wore on. His command is below-average and he tends to leave his stuff up in the zone. His 12-to-6 curve is a below-average offering, but he shows feel for a solid-average changeup. One scout called the Bradenton, Fla., native the enigma of the draft because of how he jumped on the scene from so far off the radar. Teams like the Mets and Yankees, among a handful of others who saw him at his best, might be willing to take him in the third- to fifth-round range.

    Thats the best report I’ve seen on the guy.The coaching staff is really going to be important with these guys.I don’t know why but this guy reminds me of Kontos in some ways.

  173. Emobacca June 7th, 2007 at 8:07 pm

    I really doubt Harvey signs with LAA, there has to be a reason he fell that far and passed up the big spenders multiple times

  174. Reno June 7th, 2007 at 10:11 pm

    The Angels are big spenders. He’ll sign. Another great pick by Eddie Bane.

Leave a comment below

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Forgotten Password
Cancel

Sponsored by:
 

Search

    Advertisement

    Follow

    Mobile

    Read The LoHud Yankees Blog on the go by navigating to the blog on your smartphone or mobile device's browser. No apps or downloads are required.

    LoHud TV

    More Videos

Advertisement

Place an ad

Call (914) 694-3581