The LoHud Yankees Blog

A New York Yankees blog by Chad Jennings and the staff of The Journal News


American League MVP revealed today

Posted by: Peter Abraham - Posted in Misc on Nov 19, 2007 Print This Post Print This Post | Email This Post Email This Post

The AL MVP will be announced at 2 p.m. today.

It’ll be Alex Rodriguez. The only question is whether it’ll be unanimous. If not, I’d like the hear the reason.

 
 

Advertisement

95 Responses to “American League MVP revealed today”

  1. jennifer- Hip Hip Jorge November 19th, 2007 at 10:42 am

    Is there any word, whether or no he will do the phone call?

  2. A-Point November 19th, 2007 at 10:45 am

    I think Phelps will get a lot of votes and be a darkhorse winner. ;)

  3. Rebecca--Optimist Prime November 19th, 2007 at 10:54 am

    It would be really funny if it ended up being Jorge Posada…

  4. ItalianGreco November 19th, 2007 at 10:59 am

    LOL, Phelps.

  5. z November 19th, 2007 at 11:00 am

    there is an Arod special on ESPN at 2pm est today. Should be good

  6. Googlie Eyes November 19th, 2007 at 11:11 am

    Hmmm, is the Arod special anything like meatloaf or is it prime rib?

  7. Buddy Biancalana November 19th, 2007 at 11:12 am

    A Rod will be on the conference call, whew!!!

    http://www.nypost.com/seven/11.....973144.htm

  8. Shamus November 19th, 2007 at 11:18 am

    Well….

    Seeing as that Feinsand left Josh Beckett entirely off his Cy Young ballot, then I could see some Boston Sox-based beat writer, a Cafardo, or Edes, maybe Tony ‘wishes he was Soprano’ Massarotti totally leaving A-Rod off a ballot.

    The rivalry even transcends into the media covering the teams… Wasn’t there almost a brawl at the Sox reporters vs. Yankees reporters softball game this summer?

    C’mon Pete…give us the dirty details… Who did you drop a people’s elbow on? Tell me it was Shaughnessy….

  9. gayle November 19th, 2007 at 11:24 am

    After last years MVP voting and that guy from Chicago voting jeter 6th nothing would be a suprise and it should not be a surprise

  10. Hank November 19th, 2007 at 11:24 am

    Googlie Eyes

    the A-Rod special is champagne, caviar and a side of bologna

  11. Mauro November 19th, 2007 at 11:29 am

    I could see the writer’s love for “ole’crooked-mary-legs” (Beckett) influence the vote for MVP this year

  12. z November 19th, 2007 at 11:30 am

    to someone like me who has been at UMass for this whole fall, the only positive talk i get on the yankees on tv is ESPN. So to me it will be prime rib. Now the stuff on NESN that is bologna.

  13. whozat November 19th, 2007 at 11:30 am

    “that guy from Chicago voting jeter 6th nothing would be a suprise and it should not be a surprise”

    That was totally ridiculous. I usually don’t enjoy mike and the mad dog (turns out I hate being shouted at by idiots, go figure), but they TORE HIM APART with actual solidly logical arguments when they had him on the show. It was great. He started talking about how Jeter hadn’t been THAT special in 06, and how it’s not a lifetime achievement award. Then, they asked why Ortiz was so high on his ballot, and he started talking about how he’d been so clutch ever since he came to the Sox. Whoops.

    Personally, I would’ve picked Jeter or Mauer. I mean…providing the offensive support they did from premier defensive positions, that’s just more important that extra homers from a 1B.

    Anyhow.

  14. * * THEE BOSTON BUGLE * * November 19th, 2007 at 11:35 am

    They’ll be no doubt who Gammons will vote for. Even though he’s primarily with ESPN, he’s still a voting member of the Baseball Writers Association of America.
    Him voting against one of his Sox players ? Ha !

  15. mel November 19th, 2007 at 11:38 am

    http://www.boston.com/sports/b.....able_papi/

    Not sure if this guy has a vote, but he’d vote for Big Papi.

  16. hmmm November 19th, 2007 at 11:39 am

    i don’t think it will be unanimous. every year the voters get stupider.

    Morneau was simply embarrassing last year.

  17. mary ellen November 19th, 2007 at 11:42 am

    I have to go along with those who think A-Rod’s vote won’t be unanimous – because once again, the Red Sox envy will raise it’s ugly head and the Boston writers won’t be able to get over themselves and vote for a Yankee. Even if that Yankee has achieved success that supercedes anyone else in the game today and probably ever. These awards are starting to become passe due to the fact that there are too many voters who bring predjudice to the process.

  18. Shamus November 19th, 2007 at 11:46 am

    Not to rip Feinsand in my original post… He made very good points as to why he left Beckett off his ballot, good argument.

    So, it wasn’t over somthing silly like a personal vendetta. Anyone remember when George King cost Pedro Martinez the MVP award because he left him off the ballot— ’99 I think…?

    Funny stuff…

  19. raymagnetic November 19th, 2007 at 11:50 am

    Anyone remember when George King cost Pedro Martinez the MVP award because he left him off the ballot— ‘99 I think…?

    Jeter should have won the MVP award that year anyway.

  20. Shamus November 19th, 2007 at 11:57 am

    Mel,

    The no-talent a$s-clown that wrote the article link you posted, Jason Tuohey, is a crack member of the Boston.com site of talented-yet-never-heard-of sports writers

    HE BELONGS IN THE SHED WITH THE REST OF THE TOOLS….

    And no, thankfully, he’s about 10 years away from getting a vote…

  21. jennifer- Hip Hip Jorge November 19th, 2007 at 12:00 pm

    Agreed Mary. For that Boston writer to sit and pick numbers that look favorable to ORtiz as the reason he should win is laughable. I didn’t read the entire thing, but did he bring up Alex’s clutch numbers in the 8th/9th inning this yeaR?

  22. mel November 19th, 2007 at 12:02 pm

    Shamus,

    LOL. Sounded like a stat head. I still think that the MVP should be a position player. He’s got no leg to stand on with that one. Funny how intangibles like leadership count for Ortiz, but not Jeter…

  23. Chosen1s08 November 19th, 2007 at 12:06 pm

    JORGE FOR MVP

  24. JL November 19th, 2007 at 12:10 pm

    Gammons will vote for Beckett or Mike Lowell

  25. Shamus November 19th, 2007 at 12:11 pm

    Now, Jorge for MVP isn’t that far-fetched of a notion… I bet he snags somewhere between 3rd and 6th.

    Who else from th AL…?

    Any pitchers catch any votes?

    Maybe some fool in Ohio throws an MVP vote to CC or Fausto?

    Some pot-smoking hippy reporter from SoCal decides Lackey was the MVP?

    Watch someone from the Northeast try to vote Jacoby Ellsbury or Dustin “Hair Club for” Pedroia MVP…

  26. Shamus November 19th, 2007 at 12:13 pm

    Are sports writers subject to drug testing? Does it depend on the paper?

    If I had to be the beat writer for Tampa Bay, KC, Baltimore, etc… I would probably have to take drugs before work every night just to try and be creative about the terrible baseball I’d be watching, day after day!

  27. Jim November 19th, 2007 at 12:17 pm

    I was at the Bruce show in Boston last night as well. Great show. I got a kick out that when Bruce made his comment about the World Champions. I got to meet the big man after the show.

  28. realism speaking November 19th, 2007 at 12:23 pm

    New England fans think the Socks are supposed to run away with every award in sight. They’re very delusional and very bandwagonal.

  29. TurnTwo November 19th, 2007 at 12:26 pm

    FYI: White Sox just traded Jon Garland to the Angels for SS Orlando Cabrera.

  30. jennifer- Hip Hip Jorge November 19th, 2007 at 12:33 pm

    We usually hit Garland right? So thats one game we’ll win against the halo’s.

  31. JUAN GONZALEZ November 19th, 2007 at 12:33 pm

    Anyone who thinks A-Rod is a great player doesn’t watch every inning of every game. He fails in 90% of clutch situations. His 0 for 27 in the playoffs the last few years with runners on shows that there is something mentally wrong with him. You can’t have that much talent and fail so dramatically. Maybe you can understand 5 for 27 against tough pitching but ZERO hits? Even a pitcher can top that! Anyone who says there are 8 other hitters on the team doesn’t realize that A-Rod is the cleanup hitter and “MVP” so he should be the best on the team in the clutch not the worst! During the season he also fails but it’s less evident unless you watch every at bat. A-Rod is great at tacking on runs against mop up relievers or hitting a home run to make it a 6-3 loss instead of a 6-1 loss. This is how he accumulates the huge numbers. I’m sure the Yankees can win at least the same amount of games with Betamit at 3rd and maybe more since the chemistry on the team would be better. A-Rod has very few friends on the team and there is a reason for that. I’m a true blue Yankees fan of 37 seasons and I can’t stand to watch A-Rod play for my team. Have I been missing something positive about him? And what about the Red Sox. The Yankees beat them out for A-Rods services and they have gone on to win 2 World Series without him!! I rest my case.

  32. TurnTwo November 19th, 2007 at 12:37 pm

    a move trading Cabrera makes me think they’re trading for Miguel Carbera when its all said and done. Besides Vladdy, Cabrera was one of the only other bats in that lineup that could do anything. now they’ve really got nothing.

  33. saucy November 19th, 2007 at 12:50 pm

    man, these comments are going slow today…

    in the meantime, vote for joba

    http://www.espn.go.com/mag/?lp.....d=tab8pos1

  34. Yanksrule57 November 19th, 2007 at 12:51 pm

    This guy “Juan Gonzalez is just trying to get attention. Obviously his “37 years” as a Yankee fan didn’t include last season. Don’t get me wrong I was a mad as anyone over what happened after the season ended, but, we got the best player in the game back without giving up anything.
    The Yanks would not have made the playoffs without him last year, period. He also performed better in the playoffs than several other starters (cough, Jeter, cough). What are you missing about him? Do you really want an answer to that question or are you just trying to be provacative?

    I guess he would rather have traded some of our young pitchers for Joe Crede.

  35. Scooter November 19th, 2007 at 12:54 pm

    TurnTwo -

    The Angels have two of the best shortstop prospects in all of baseball – Brandon Wood and Erick Aybar

    One will become the starting shortsop, and one could get traded in a deal for Miguel Cabrera

  36. Tony NJ November 19th, 2007 at 12:59 pm

    The JUAN GONZALEZ

  37. Tony NJ November 19th, 2007 at 12:59 pm

    commenter is a joke.

  38. TurnTwo November 19th, 2007 at 1:00 pm

    yeah, a package of Adenhart, Wood, and Jeff Mathis could prob get it done on the Angels end. Brandon Wood was drafted as a SS, but it’s believed that he’ll settle in at 3B.

    It was reported that the Marlins insisted on the Angels included Howie Kendrick in any package for Cabrera, but i guess we’ll see.

  39. Bartleby November 19th, 2007 at 1:02 pm

    And the Angels may trade a prospect.

    Like that will ever happen.

  40. Sampson Westchester November 19th, 2007 at 1:06 pm

    A-Rod not clutch?

    I guess some guys didn’t watch any games ladt year.

    And since when is 40+ homers a yr and 100 rbi’s not clutch?

    They all don’t come when the team is down 12-1.

    Ridiculous.

  41. G. Love November 19th, 2007 at 1:11 pm

    I think that Angels/White Sox trade pretty much tells you they are going all in on Miguel Cabrera.

    He should be an Angel shortly.

  42. whozat November 19th, 2007 at 1:20 pm

    “I think that Angels/White Sox trade pretty much tells you they are going all in on Miguel Cabrera.”

    Which means they’re probably not in play for Santana:-)

    It also seems odd, given that they already had a full rotation. Maybe they’re doing this so that they can include one of their young MLB-experienced pitchers in a deal for Cabrera. Ervin Santana, or maybe even Jered Weaver.

  43. On D Ball November 19th, 2007 at 1:24 pm

    Hey!!!!!

    What’s happening!!!!!

    Not a single post on the Santana trade.

    You guys are slipping.

  44. Sherri November 19th, 2007 at 1:32 pm

    Santana trade????

  45. Sampson Westchester November 19th, 2007 at 1:33 pm

    I’ll be shocked if the Angels give up 3 Grade A prospects for Cabrera.

    I see him playing for Torre in ’08.

  46. Terence D November 19th, 2007 at 1:36 pm

    There is no Santana trade.

  47. hmmm November 19th, 2007 at 1:37 pm

    “During the season he also fails but it’s less evident unless you watch every at bat. A-Rod is great at tacking on runs against mop up relievers or hitting a home run to make it a 6-3 loss instead of a 6-1 loss. This is how he accumulates the huge numbers.”

    please, by all means back this up with some FACTS and then we can start a debate.

    i’ll wait.

  48. GG November 19th, 2007 at 1:40 pm

    I cannot believe Cabrera is older than Alex…and traded to the white sox no less.

  49. whozat November 19th, 2007 at 1:41 pm

    “I’ll be shocked if the Angels give up 3 Grade A prospects for Cabrera.

    I see him playing for Torre in ‘08.”

    Implying that the Dodgers will?

    The Angels just traded away a bat for a pitcher for whom they have no room. They’re going to get a bat, whether it’s Cabrera or Tejada. And they’re going to trade away an MLB starter for it. That’s something the Dodgers can’t do, I don’t think.

  50. hmmm November 19th, 2007 at 1:41 pm

    A-Rod HRs relative to score:

    Rel Score
    +4.. 67
    +3 41
    +2 32
    +1 58
    Tied 146
    -1 62
    -2 33
    -3 26
    -4.. 53

    331 career HRs w/in +/- 2 runs.

    your turn.

  51. whozat November 19th, 2007 at 1:44 pm

    “please, by all means back this up with some FACTS and then we can start a debate.”

    Ooh, post his late/close numbers from 07. Maybe that will set this idiot in his place. I’d do it, but I hate looking up splits. And I need to read this research paper in the next hour.

  52. jennifer- Hip Hip Jorge November 19th, 2007 at 1:44 pm

    HMm where did you find that info?

  53. LathamJoe November 19th, 2007 at 1:46 pm

    From MLB and Rotoworld:

    “Alex Rodriguez said Sunday that contract negotiations with the Yankees are “in the bottom of the fifth inning.
    Thankfully he still has a little time to pad his contract-negotiating stats before the clutch negotiating begins.”

    Wow! Ya think the MVP award increases his contract another $50 Million??

  54. Sampson Westchester November 19th, 2007 at 1:47 pm

    You obviously don’t know Ned Colletti and the pedigree he has if you don’t think the Dodgers will move some/most of their prospects this winter.

    And Billingsley/Kershaw are better than any pitcher the Angels can put up not named Lackey.

  55. Matty H November 19th, 2007 at 1:49 pm

    Forget stats. We can see with our own eyes how clutch A Rod was last yr and how he carried a team on his back.

    If you don’t think that you are biased and you should really stop posting because you are embarrassing yourself.

  56. hmmm November 19th, 2007 at 1:53 pm

    “HMm where did you find that info?”

    http://www.baseball-reference......038;type=b

  57. Parker November 19th, 2007 at 1:54 pm

    Now that Rivera is locked up can we concentrate on getting Johan here?

  58. jennifer- Hip Hip Jorge November 19th, 2007 at 1:58 pm

    Thanks. Did I read that right, he’s only hit 1 homerun on a 3-0 count?

  59. hmmm November 19th, 2007 at 1:58 pm

    more fun facts:

    career “close and late”: .280/.376/.538

    career in tie games: .300/.399/.579

    career within 1 run: .305/.399/.590

    career in August: .322/.398/.629

    career in September: .284/.377/.542

    2007 “close and late”: .357/.439/.686

    2007, 2 out RISP: .318/.448/.776

    2007 tie game: .276/.399/.577

    2007 w/in 1 run: .316/.419/.684

  60. jennifer- Hip Hip Jorge November 19th, 2007 at 1:59 pm

    Parker where did you hear/read that it was official? I”ve only read that he was expected to accept.

  61. yanks61 November 19th, 2007 at 1:59 pm

    I don’t know if it’s already been posted here but I just read somewhere that the Twins have offered Santana a $97 Mil contract for, I believe five years.No comment on his comments, if any.

    By the way, this business about MVP voting controversies goes right back to Joe D. and Ted Williams. I’m pretty sure it was a BOSTON writer who either didn’t list Ted or listed him far down in the vote, allowing Di Mag to win (it may have been 41 when Ted hit 400 and Joe D has is 56 game hitting streak.)

  62. jennifer- Hip Hip Jorge November 19th, 2007 at 2:01 pm

    Mike Lowell staying with the soxs for 3 years.

  63. mel November 19th, 2007 at 2:02 pm

    Congratulations, Alex. Received all but 2 first place votes.

  64. hmmm November 19th, 2007 at 2:02 pm

    “Thanks. Did I read that right, he’s only hit 1 homerun on a 3-0 count?”

    yes.

    he has had 251 plate appearances with a 3-0 count. of those 251 plate appearances, he has walked 238 times.

    that leaves only 11 official ABs after a 3-0 count.

    he is 6-11 in those ABs with 3 doubles and 1 HR.

    lot of “unintentional-intentonial” walks i guess.

  65. J-Dawg November 19th, 2007 at 2:02 pm

    They just announced that A-Rod is the MVP, of course. I haven’t heard the vote totals yet.

  66. Joe November 19th, 2007 at 2:03 pm

    A-Rod wasn’t unanimous. Magglio Ordonez got two first place votes from Detroit writers.

  67. jennifer- Hip Hip Jorge November 19th, 2007 at 2:04 pm

    thanks hmmm I didn’t take that into account.

  68. JoeT YANKEES November 19th, 2007 at 2:04 pm

    HOW DID MAGGS GET TWO VOTES?

  69. jennifer- Hip Hip Jorge November 19th, 2007 at 2:04 pm

    Joe do we know where they placed Alex?

  70. Rebecca--Optimist Prime November 19th, 2007 at 2:05 pm

    That’s okay, we don’t really want Lowell (no offense to him, but he’s a better fit for Fenway than YS)

  71. mel November 19th, 2007 at 2:05 pm

    If Joe is correct, then Boston writer(s) voted for Alex.

  72. Joe November 19th, 2007 at 2:11 pm

    For those asking, it looks like A-Rod was 2nd on the Detroit writers ballots.

  73. Chosen1s08 November 19th, 2007 at 2:14 pm

    so just read some talk about the yankees possibly wanting Ron Mahay anyone know much about this guy?

  74. Parker November 19th, 2007 at 2:18 pm

    It’s a disgrace he didn’t get every first place vote.

  75. whozat November 19th, 2007 at 2:19 pm

    “You obviously don’t know Ned Colletti and the pedigree he has if you don’t think the Dodgers will move some/most of their prospects this winter.”

    You obviously haven’t read the article on MLB.com where he talks about how his “prospects” aren’t prospects anymore…they’re playing in the bigs and he doesn’t want to trade them. Kemp, Ethier, guys like that.

    Also…the Dodgers need their pitching. They won’t cavalierly trade it. Yeah, they could certainly swing the deal for Cabrera. But I really don’t think the Angels would have made this deal if they weren’t on the verge of making a deal for a hitter. You don’t do this to maybe free up a pitcher for a deal you might make. You do this because you’re about to trade someone out of your rotation.

  76. whozat November 19th, 2007 at 2:21 pm

    Mahay looks mediocre and like he has injury issues.

  77. saucy November 19th, 2007 at 2:22 pm

    “so just read some talk about the yankees possibly wanting Ron Mahay anyone know much about this guy?”

    it’s funny, i was just looking at his stats from last year after browsing a list of free agents.

  78. Chosen1s08 November 19th, 2007 at 2:27 pm

    WHOZAT

    great just we need is the possibility of another guy who likes to get hurt on our team.

  79. whozat November 19th, 2007 at 2:33 pm

    “great just we need is the possibility of another guy who likes to get hurt on our team.”

    Whoo!

    I was basing that thought on what I saw on thebaseballcube, who mysteriously have no 2007 MLB stats for Mahay, so it looked like he played seven games or something last season. That’s not true, he actually had a good season, and in the AL. So maybe he’s not an injury risk like I thought. However, with Romero getting a gazillion dollars and Jamie Walker – another old lefty – getting 4 years on his deal last offseason, Mahay may command a 3-4 year deal, which would just be outrageous for how inconsistent he’s been. I’d not take him on more than a 2 year deal. We’ll see.

  80. Sampson Westchester November 19th, 2007 at 2:34 pm

    If they aren’t prospects than why you going on and on about Colletti keeping them??? I also forget the memon that says take every GM at his word and every GM is 100% honest in talking about what the teams plans are.

    You sound so naive, “whozat”.

    The Dodgers have the best system in the game. They need a power hitting, 3b. Hmmmmm. Sounds like a match made in trade heaven.

    And name me one trade the Angels have made when they traded prospects. One. I dare you. The Angels getting Garland just shored up the startinbg staff. They weren’t dealing from a surplus there. Colon is gone. Santana is a huge disappointment. So it’s Lackey-Escobar-Weaver-Garland-Saunders

    They didn’t make this trade to trade Weaver, Aybar and Adenhart to Florida.

  81. Andy November 19th, 2007 at 2:39 pm

    “Mahay may command a 3-4 year deal, which would just be outrageous for how inconsistent he’s been. I’d not take him on more than a 2 year deal. We’ll see.”

    You’re so gracious taking him on a 2 yr deal. I’m sure the Mahay’s will be glad about your generosity. Trouble is the market sets the rate and if a scrub like Romero gets 3 yrs you can count on Mahay getting 3 for sure.

  82. Wayne Hills November 19th, 2007 at 2:40 pm

    Torre didn’t sign with LA to develop minor leaguers. He wants to win right away and if he has a chance to get Cabrera for a few prospects they won’t hesitate.

  83. Chosen1s08 November 19th, 2007 at 2:48 pm

    So now what does it look like for the FA agents we havnt resigned yet. And which ones are possibly coming back?

  84. whozat November 19th, 2007 at 3:01 pm

    “If they aren’t prospects than why you going on and on about Colletti keeping them???”

    Because they’re the guys people are asking for.

    “The Dodgers have the best system in the game. They need a power hitting, 3b. Hmmmmm.”

    Are they trading some of their starting outfield for him?

    Dude…did I just say that they could easily swing a deal for them? Yes. I also said that they can’t part with pitching.

    Also, do the Angels have a new GM? Yes! Did I also say they may be trading for Tejada and NOT Cabrera? Yes!

    Basically, I wrote a well-reasoned post that acknowledged all possibilities with the information that I have (including that teams still like Santana – one bad year for a 24 year old does not a “bust” make), and you called me naive because you’re too lazy to go read and understand what I’m talking about.

    So, in sum, shove it.

    “You’re so gracious taking him on a 2 yr deal. ”

    And what’s your problem? I’m saying that I wouldn’t sign him to more than a two year deal. I didn’t say he should be gracious for it, nor did I say he wouldn’t get a 3 year deal somewhere. In fact, I’m pretty sure that “command a 3-4 year deal” means EXACTLY that I think he’ll get a 3-4 year deal somewhere.

  85. JUAN GONZALEZ November 19th, 2007 at 3:08 pm

    Stats are deceiving in baseball but that fact is that A-Rod has a mental block like Knobluach had. Otherwise how can you explain 0 for 27 with runners on in the playoffs? Even I know he’s not that bad. As for the stats of when he hits his home runs. Like I said, they don’t tell the whole story! Those stats don’t tell you the game situation and who was pitching. There are only 20 or 30 times a year that a player comes up to bat in a really clutch situation against a tough pitcher in a game where that at bat can decide the outcome. You need to watch every game to notice those situations and how a players performs in them. A-Rod has failed much to often in those spots. Watch the game, not box scores!

  86. Sampson Westchester November 19th, 2007 at 3:09 pm

    Whozat,

    You are really naive if you think Colletti won’t trade prospects for veterans. And just because a guy has 150 at bats in the majors doesn’t make him a non prospect anymore.

    Cabrera is a difference maker in a lineup. If you can get him by surrendering 3 prospects from your loaded minor league system you do it. And maybe you should go peruse Baseball America and read up on the Dodgers farm system before you run your mouth off.

  87. Mark November 19th, 2007 at 3:10 pm

    Juan Gonzalez.

    Please bugger off.

    No one is listening to your anti Yankee garbage.

  88. Brian F November 19th, 2007 at 3:11 pm

    I’d rather have Billingsly, Kershaw and LaRoche than anything the Angels have.

  89. ansky November 19th, 2007 at 3:14 pm

    I think whozat just picks something out at random to argue about daily here. No rhyme or reason.

  90. Sweet Lou Gehrig November 19th, 2007 at 3:16 pm

    I understand waiting for Santana but Cabrera would be a nice addition to the lineup and you can put him at 1b.

    Considering we’ve had a blackhole at 1b and still produce over 900 runs. Would be nice to actually have someone there who can produce.

  91. Andy November 19th, 2007 at 3:17 pm

    Someone get whozat some decaf.

    STAT!

    Santana over Cabrera. We need starting pitching.

  92. Parker November 19th, 2007 at 3:23 pm

    Thanks for laughs, Juan G.

  93. hmmm November 19th, 2007 at 5:12 pm

    “You need to watch every game to notice those situations and how a players performs in them. A-Rod has failed much to often in those spots. Watch the game, not box scores!”

    i do watch every game.

    why does everyone who can’t back up their points with facts resort to this argument??

  94. JUAN GONZALEZ November 20th, 2007 at 10:28 am

    >why does everyone who can’t back up their points with facts >resort to this argument??

    There are aspects to baseball that you just have to experience through watching every game. Chemistry on a team is something you can’t measure through stats. The Yankees in 1996 for example didn’t have the best team but they had the right types of players and the right chemistry. A-Rod brings a team only stats. Jeter, Posada, Rivera, Oneil, Pettitte , etc. are the types of players that win. A-Rod is the type of player that folds under pressure. I don’t care how much money he makes or what his personality is like. If he came through in the clutch I would be happy he is on the team, but the guy is poor performer when it matters most and he is a below average 3rd baseman. I cut him some slack in the field because 3rd isn’t his position but if you want some stats what about 0 for 27 in the playoffs with runners on base? Isn’t that a face? You have to wonder what is wrong with him. For a ninth place hitter maybe you can imagine that possibility but how can an MVP type player do that? I’d like to see Ortiz or Ramirez have that problem but it never seems to happen to them! I guess they just have what it takes and A-Rod does not. He will still hit 800 home runs but will the Yankees win in the playoffs with him? I’ve been waiting 4 years and I don’t trust that he can change. If he does I’ll be happy to say I was wrong.

  95. Rob Cuper November 23rd, 2007 at 11:31 am

    I would rather have Daisuke Matsuzaka at bat in a clutch situation in the playoffs. Anyone who backs up arod with stats is being an idiot. You can not measure everything with stats. It’s a lot easier in the playoffs to see how a player does. All of those games mean a lot and arod obviously chokes really bad or no one would be talking about this. Even his team mates know he chokes and they try to help him, it was in sports illustrated and confirmed by Giambi. Arod is no Reggie Jackson and the Yankees are 1 win and 4 loses in playoffs series with the best player in the game on their team, that’s all the stats you need. I think they did a little better without him.

Leave a comment below

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Forgotten Password
Cancel

Sponsored by:
 

Search

    Advertisement

    Follow

    Mobile

    Read The LoHud Yankees Blog on the go by navigating to the blog on your smartphone or mobile device's browser. No apps or downloads are required.

    LoHud TV

    More Videos

Advertisement

Place an ad

Call (914) 694-3581