<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Today in The Journal News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2008/03/20/today-in-the-journal-news-225/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2008/03/20/today-in-the-journal-news-225/</link>
	<description>A New York Yankees blog by Chad Jennings and the staff of The Journal News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:20:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: NY Fan</title>
		<link>http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2008/03/20/today-in-the-journal-news-225/comment-page-1/#comment-281344</link>
		<dc:creator>NY Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 22:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2008/03/20/today-in-the-journal-news-225/#comment-281344</guid>
		<description>If I were Girardi, there&#039;s no reason to take him out of the bullpen unless they are short on starters. Joba is way to dominant. It is hard for the batter to ajust from 90 mph  to 100+ fatballs and a filthy slider(not to mention his occational curve ball and change-up). He4 is the catalyst the yanks need to close out games.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I were Girardi, there&#8217;s no reason to take him out of the bullpen unless they are short on starters. Joba is way to dominant. It is hard for the batter to ajust from 90 mph  to 100+ fatballs and a filthy slider(not to mention his occational curve ball and change-up). He4 is the catalyst the yanks need to close out games.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave S.</title>
		<link>http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2008/03/20/today-in-the-journal-news-225/comment-page-1/#comment-281019</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2008/03/20/today-in-the-journal-news-225/#comment-281019</guid>
		<description>Rishi - I often differ with Olney on his opinions, but today I think he hits the nail on the head.  The Sox acted rashly, but with defensible sentiment.  But they knew that MLB would cave pretty quickly.

The Newsday article makes it seem like it&#039;s going to be cushy for the Sox to travel to Japan.  It&#039;s easy!  It&#039;s luxury!  Dude, flying to Asia sucks, no matter how swanky the flight is.  The jetlag trashes your body, the weird schedule will trash their routine.  They may have some fun, but if anyone thinks that this will in any way improve their baseball performance...that this is easy living...they are pretty deeply deluded.  Or they write in New York and want to throw some red meat to the Yankee faithful.  Either way, it&#039;s a silly and inflammatory article.

Comparing the obviously deeply classy move the Yanks made in playing against VT with what happened with the Sox is apples and oranges.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rishi &#8211; I often differ with Olney on his opinions, but today I think he hits the nail on the head.  The Sox acted rashly, but with defensible sentiment.  But they knew that MLB would cave pretty quickly.</p>
<p>The Newsday article makes it seem like it&#8217;s going to be cushy for the Sox to travel to Japan.  It&#8217;s easy!  It&#8217;s luxury!  Dude, flying to Asia sucks, no matter how swanky the flight is.  The jetlag trashes your body, the weird schedule will trash their routine.  They may have some fun, but if anyone thinks that this will in any way improve their baseball performance&#8230;that this is easy living&#8230;they are pretty deeply deluded.  Or they write in New York and want to throw some red meat to the Yankee faithful.  Either way, it&#8217;s a silly and inflammatory article.</p>
<p>Comparing the obviously deeply classy move the Yanks made in playing against VT with what happened with the Sox is apples and oranges.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UtilityMan</title>
		<link>http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2008/03/20/today-in-the-journal-news-225/comment-page-1/#comment-280971</link>
		<dc:creator>UtilityMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2008/03/20/today-in-the-journal-news-225/#comment-280971</guid>
		<description>Yeah Jay....I was there.........leaving tonight 820PM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah Jay&#8230;.I was there&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;leaving tonight 820PM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2008/03/20/today-in-the-journal-news-225/comment-page-1/#comment-280964</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2008/03/20/today-in-the-journal-news-225/#comment-280964</guid>
		<description>Phil Hughes will be fine.  Being roughed up in a spring training game is not  a big issue.  These guys are working on all of their pitches.  I live it that Joba will start in the pen.  Now we need Kennedy and Mussina to step up.
www.recreateyourlifenow.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil Hughes will be fine.  Being roughed up in a spring training game is not  a big issue.  These guys are working on all of their pitches.  I live it that Joba will start in the pen.  Now we need Kennedy and Mussina to step up.<br />
<a href="http://www.recreateyourlifenow.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.recreateyourlifenow.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fran</title>
		<link>http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2008/03/20/today-in-the-journal-news-225/comment-page-1/#comment-280962</link>
		<dc:creator>Fran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2008/03/20/today-in-the-journal-news-225/#comment-280962</guid>
		<description>Where was the team chemistry when they had to vote on the Japan trip? It was far from unanimous in the Red Sox clubhouse then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where was the team chemistry when they had to vote on the Japan trip? It was far from unanimous in the Red Sox clubhouse then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rishi</title>
		<link>http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2008/03/20/today-in-the-journal-news-225/comment-page-1/#comment-280959</link>
		<dc:creator>Rishi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2008/03/20/today-in-the-journal-news-225/#comment-280959</guid>
		<description>This is from Buster Olney this morning:

As the Red Sox threatened a boycott of Wednesday&#039;s game, they worked for team unity, as Jackie MacMullan writes. 


The sentiment behind what was essentially a three-hour boycott was admirable, but the players handled the situation very clumsily; it was their union that negotiated the stipends for the players and did not support the coaches, just as it has for years, and if the players weren&#039;t aware of that, that&#039;s their fault. But it was the fans who bought tickets to the game in Ft. Myers on Thursday who ultimately suffered, and were forced to sit around without information, while waiting to see if a resolution could be reached. 

Given that it was the responsibility of the Red Sox players to understand the situation before it became a crisis, a more magnanimous gesture would have been for some of the Boston players to offer up their stipends to the coaches, given that some of them are paid somewhere between $60,000 and $100,000 a day, rather than victimizing the fans. Or the Red Sox players could&#039;ve quietly informed the Players Association and Major League Baseball that once in Japan, they intended to insist that the coaches&#039; situation be addressed. The nuclear option of sitting out games only needed to be implied, because there was zero chance that the Red Sox would&#039;ve forfeited these games; there was zero chance that Major League Baseball would&#039;ve let that happen. 

Instead, the Red Sox walked out on a crowd that had paid in good faith to see a baseball game. &quot;At the end of the day, it is the fans that took the hit,&quot; said a major league executive with another team, in disgust. 

To repeat: The sentiment behind the gesture is admirable. The relationship between the Red Sox players and their coaching staff is as close as any player-staff relationship in the sport. It was a money matter that had nothing to do with greed on the part of the players. But their action was rash and not particularly thought out or executed well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is from Buster Olney this morning:</p>
<p>As the Red Sox threatened a boycott of Wednesday&#8217;s game, they worked for team unity, as Jackie MacMullan writes. </p>
<p>The sentiment behind what was essentially a three-hour boycott was admirable, but the players handled the situation very clumsily; it was their union that negotiated the stipends for the players and did not support the coaches, just as it has for years, and if the players weren&#8217;t aware of that, that&#8217;s their fault. But it was the fans who bought tickets to the game in Ft. Myers on Thursday who ultimately suffered, and were forced to sit around without information, while waiting to see if a resolution could be reached. </p>
<p>Given that it was the responsibility of the Red Sox players to understand the situation before it became a crisis, a more magnanimous gesture would have been for some of the Boston players to offer up their stipends to the coaches, given that some of them are paid somewhere between $60,000 and $100,000 a day, rather than victimizing the fans. Or the Red Sox players could&#8217;ve quietly informed the Players Association and Major League Baseball that once in Japan, they intended to insist that the coaches&#8217; situation be addressed. The nuclear option of sitting out games only needed to be implied, because there was zero chance that the Red Sox would&#8217;ve forfeited these games; there was zero chance that Major League Baseball would&#8217;ve let that happen. </p>
<p>Instead, the Red Sox walked out on a crowd that had paid in good faith to see a baseball game. &#8220;At the end of the day, it is the fans that took the hit,&#8221; said a major league executive with another team, in disgust. </p>
<p>To repeat: The sentiment behind the gesture is admirable. The relationship between the Red Sox players and their coaching staff is as close as any player-staff relationship in the sport. It was a money matter that had nothing to do with greed on the part of the players. But their action was rash and not particularly thought out or executed well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jennifer- Hip Hip Jorge</title>
		<link>http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2008/03/20/today-in-the-journal-news-225/comment-page-1/#comment-280951</link>
		<dc:creator>jennifer- Hip Hip Jorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2008/03/20/today-in-the-journal-news-225/#comment-280951</guid>
		<description>It was funny litening to the radio, will this help team chemistry what???  Because they all agreed?  Give me a break.  The A&#039;s were fine with their coaches not being paid, but once the soxs called agreed with their protest, as did the Jays.  Does that mean that the Jays, A&#039;s and Soxs all have great chemistry?  No it means they all belong to the same union and have to agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was funny litening to the radio, will this help team chemistry what???  Because they all agreed?  Give me a break.  The A&#8217;s were fine with their coaches not being paid, but once the soxs called agreed with their protest, as did the Jays.  Does that mean that the Jays, A&#8217;s and Soxs all have great chemistry?  No it means they all belong to the same union and have to agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fran</title>
		<link>http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2008/03/20/today-in-the-journal-news-225/comment-page-1/#comment-280950</link>
		<dc:creator>Fran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2008/03/20/today-in-the-journal-news-225/#comment-280950</guid>
		<description>Jennifer - I missed that article this morning. Thanks for posting it.  The Red Sox were at fault for not including the coaches when they divided up the money. They knew they had to include them when they divided up playoff and world series shares.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jennifer &#8211; I missed that article this morning. Thanks for posting it.  The Red Sox were at fault for not including the coaches when they divided up the money. They knew they had to include them when they divided up playoff and world series shares.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jennifer- Hip Hip Jorge</title>
		<link>http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2008/03/20/today-in-the-journal-news-225/comment-page-1/#comment-280948</link>
		<dc:creator>jennifer- Hip Hip Jorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2008/03/20/today-in-the-journal-news-225/#comment-280948</guid>
		<description>yazman, the knew MLB would never allow the games in Japan to be cancelled.  There would be egg on mlb&#039;s face.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yazman, the knew MLB would never allow the games in Japan to be cancelled.  There would be egg on mlb&#8217;s face.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vi</title>
		<link>http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2008/03/20/today-in-the-journal-news-225/comment-page-1/#comment-280946</link>
		<dc:creator>Vi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2008/03/20/today-in-the-journal-news-225/#comment-280946</guid>
		<description>Yazman - I agree. The team&#039;s FO could have paid for the stipend in protest. Any way you look at it, boycotting was not the way to go. That they were actually willing to nix the trip to the detriment of the thousands of fans for the sake of 10(or more) coaches tells me that the team&#039;s priority is not baseball, far from it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yazman &#8211; I agree. The team&#8217;s FO could have paid for the stipend in protest. Any way you look at it, boycotting was not the way to go. That they were actually willing to nix the trip to the detriment of the thousands of fans for the sake of 10(or more) coaches tells me that the team&#8217;s priority is not baseball, far from it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

