<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.2.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Breaking down the bench</title>
	<link>http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2008/03/22/breaking-down-the-bench/</link>
	<description>A Yankees Blog by Journal News beat writer Peter Abraham</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 02:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.2.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: bodhisattva</title>
		<link>http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2008/03/22/breaking-down-the-bench/#comment-282484</link>
		<dc:creator>bodhisattva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 21:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2008/03/22/breaking-down-the-bench/#comment-282484</guid>
		<description>G Love. 

You can't compare Pena to Ensberg. Pena is younger and a lefty power hitter; much more potent for Yankee Stadium.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>G Love. </p>
<p>You can&#8217;t compare Pena to Ensberg. Pena is younger and a lefty power hitter; much more potent for Yankee Stadium.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bottom line</title>
		<link>http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2008/03/22/breaking-down-the-bench/#comment-282413</link>
		<dc:creator>bottom line</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 18:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2008/03/22/breaking-down-the-bench/#comment-282413</guid>
		<description>Actually, on second thought Jackie Robinson without speed wouldn't have been anywhere near Bobby Grich.  Maybe Tony Taylor.  Anybody  remember him?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, on second thought Jackie Robinson without speed wouldn&#8217;t have been anywhere near Bobby Grich.  Maybe Tony Taylor.  Anybody  remember him?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bottom line</title>
		<link>http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2008/03/22/breaking-down-the-bench/#comment-282393</link>
		<dc:creator>bottom line</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 18:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2008/03/22/breaking-down-the-bench/#comment-282393</guid>
		<description>Completing the last sentence:

..and the others were, take away their speed, average or perhaps good players who would be little remembered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Completing the last sentence:</p>
<p>..and the others were, take away their speed, average or perhaps good players who would be little remembered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bottom line</title>
		<link>http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2008/03/22/breaking-down-the-bench/#comment-282389</link>
		<dc:creator>bottom line</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 18:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2008/03/22/breaking-down-the-bench/#comment-282389</guid>
		<description>Old Fan,

Sure, a higher OPS is better than a low one.  But how good, really, were Robinson, Brock and Henderson if you took speed out of their games?  Base running is the most under rated skill in the game.  Bunting, second. The juiced-up stats of the last two decades obscured that but it will soon become clear again.   I'll take Gardner over a bunch of lead-legged stiffs with cast-iron gloves and  occasional power. Jim Spencer, anyone? Toby Harrah?  Mark my words.  By May or June, people will be clamoring for Gardner (or maybe even Justin Christian)  

Yeah, Robinson without speed wasn't as good as Bobby Grich.   Mays without speed?  Sure, McCovey.   and the others were, take away their speed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Old Fan,</p>
<p>Sure, a higher OPS is better than a low one.  But how good, really, were Robinson, Brock and Henderson if you took speed out of their games?  Base running is the most under rated skill in the game.  Bunting, second. The juiced-up stats of the last two decades obscured that but it will soon become clear again.   I&#8217;ll take Gardner over a bunch of lead-legged stiffs with cast-iron gloves and  occasional power. Jim Spencer, anyone? Toby Harrah?  Mark my words.  By May or June, people will be clamoring for Gardner (or maybe even Justin Christian)  </p>
<p>Yeah, Robinson without speed wasn&#8217;t as good as Bobby Grich.   Mays without speed?  Sure, McCovey.   and the others were, take away their speed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G. Love</title>
		<link>http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2008/03/22/breaking-down-the-bench/#comment-282347</link>
		<dc:creator>G. Love</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 17:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2008/03/22/breaking-down-the-bench/#comment-282347</guid>
		<description>I honestly can't understand the Yankee fan on here who is upset at Ensberg making this team.

It's ridiculous. I mean, are you seriously counting on Giambi at age 38 to play an injury free 1b and be in the field every single day?

Are you?

If we let Ensberg go for the Cody Ransom, Woodward, Alberto Gonazles of the world, Ensberg will be snapped up and he will hit close to 30 HR's and destroy LH pitching for another team. 

It will be Carlos Pena all over again. 

Ensberg will play against lefties every game. Mark it down. He will either DH or play 1b (probably 1b). 

This isn't Josh Phelps. This is a guy who proved himself at the major league level and had his power sapped due to a shoulder injury he's finally healing from. 

Some of you guys seriously have screws loose. 

You care more about having the defensively perfect emergency SS, 2b OF for the one game we might need him before we can DL the injured player and call up the appropriate replacement, than you do about having a team that is as fierce against LH pitching as it is against RH pitching?

You'd rather waste a spot on an slick fielding fast running UTIF than a guy who crushes lefties (isn't terrible against righties) and can play both corners?

Here's what happens if Jeter goes down for a long stretch. They try Betemit. If it doesn't work, Arod plays SS and Ensberg, an accomplished 3b, plays 3rd. 

Here's what happenes if Cano goes down for a long stretch. They try Betemit. If he doesn't work out, they call up a 2b from the minors to fill in. 

Here's what happens if Arod or Giambi go down. They play Ensberg as a replacement. 

Where exactly is this guy hurting our team?

Is he hurting us because your minor league mascot of the month in Gardner and Ransom have to put some more time in the minors?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I honestly can&#8217;t understand the Yankee fan on here who is upset at Ensberg making this team.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s ridiculous. I mean, are you seriously counting on Giambi at age 38 to play an injury free 1b and be in the field every single day?</p>
<p>Are you?</p>
<p>If we let Ensberg go for the Cody Ransom, Woodward, Alberto Gonazles of the world, Ensberg will be snapped up and he will hit close to 30 HR&#8217;s and destroy LH pitching for another team. </p>
<p>It will be Carlos Pena all over again. </p>
<p>Ensberg will play against lefties every game. Mark it down. He will either DH or play 1b (probably 1b). </p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t Josh Phelps. This is a guy who proved himself at the major league level and had his power sapped due to a shoulder injury he&#8217;s finally healing from. </p>
<p>Some of you guys seriously have screws loose. </p>
<p>You care more about having the defensively perfect emergency SS, 2b OF for the one game we might need him before we can DL the injured player and call up the appropriate replacement, than you do about having a team that is as fierce against LH pitching as it is against RH pitching?</p>
<p>You&#8217;d rather waste a spot on an slick fielding fast running UTIF than a guy who crushes lefties (isn&#8217;t terrible against righties) and can play both corners?</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what happens if Jeter goes down for a long stretch. They try Betemit. If it doesn&#8217;t work, Arod plays SS and Ensberg, an accomplished 3b, plays 3rd. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what happenes if Cano goes down for a long stretch. They try Betemit. If he doesn&#8217;t work out, they call up a 2b from the minors to fill in. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what happens if Arod or Giambi go down. They play Ensberg as a replacement. </p>
<p>Where exactly is this guy hurting our team?</p>
<p>Is he hurting us because your minor league mascot of the month in Gardner and Ransom have to put some more time in the minors?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bodhisattva</title>
		<link>http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2008/03/22/breaking-down-the-bench/#comment-282327</link>
		<dc:creator>bodhisattva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 16:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2008/03/22/breaking-down-the-bench/#comment-282327</guid>
		<description>FYI to people who don't know this:

CANO BATTED .328 VS LHP. He's not merely a good hitter vs. lefties, He's anathema to lefties. Expect that to continue.  Therefore, you might not want to include him in your group of "too many lefties" vs. LHP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI to people who don&#8217;t know this:</p>
<p>CANO BATTED .328 VS LHP. He&#8217;s not merely a good hitter vs. lefties, He&#8217;s anathema to lefties. Expect that to continue.  Therefore, you might not want to include him in your group of &#8220;too many lefties&#8221; vs. LHP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: george</title>
		<link>http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2008/03/22/breaking-down-the-bench/#comment-282303</link>
		<dc:creator>george</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 15:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2008/03/22/breaking-down-the-bench/#comment-282303</guid>
		<description>yeah, the bench lacks base-stealing speed, but overall it seems a much deeper bench than in recent years.  for example, Betemit provides much more offense than Cairo did, while Cairo gave some speed. If i need to start my backup IF, Betemit should produce more runs.

the real issue is modern baseball and the high number of relievers on a roster; carrying 12 pitchers means you almost have to sacrifice some facet of the bench.  in this case it was speed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, the bench lacks base-stealing speed, but overall it seems a much deeper bench than in recent years.  for example, Betemit provides much more offense than Cairo did, while Cairo gave some speed. If i need to start my backup IF, Betemit should produce more runs.</p>
<p>the real issue is modern baseball and the high number of relievers on a roster; carrying 12 pitchers means you almost have to sacrifice some facet of the bench.  in this case it was speed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OldYanksFan</title>
		<link>http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2008/03/22/breaking-down-the-bench/#comment-282298</link>
		<dc:creator>OldYanksFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 15:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2008/03/22/breaking-down-the-bench/#comment-282298</guid>
		<description>Oops... numbers above are OPS+</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops&#8230; numbers above are OPS+</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OldYanksFan</title>
		<link>http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2008/03/22/breaking-down-the-bench/#comment-282297</link>
		<dc:creator>OldYanksFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 15:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2008/03/22/breaking-down-the-bench/#comment-282297</guid>
		<description>Willie Mays - 156
Jackie RObinson - 132
Ricky Henderson - 127
Lou Brock - 109
Mickey Rivers - 106
Maury Wills - 88 (excellent defensive SS in the '70s)
Vince Coleman - 83 (7 teams, 13 years)

Juan Pierre - 84
Dave Roberts - 84

So you have three super stars who you thinks were starts because they had great speed? 2 Above average players, and 2 below. I was a SS in a diferent era, the other average 2 years per team.

And then you have Juan and Dave sukatude, although both are better then Gardner is now.

Really, you folks come up with the most bizarre and cherry picked examples and try to use them to make a point.
People: OPS &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; Speed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Willie Mays - 156<br />
Jackie RObinson - 132<br />
Ricky Henderson - 127<br />
Lou Brock - 109<br />
Mickey Rivers - 106<br />
Maury Wills - 88 (excellent defensive SS in the &#8217;70s)<br />
Vince Coleman - 83 (7 teams, 13 years)</p>
<p>Juan Pierre - 84<br />
Dave Roberts - 84</p>
<p>So you have three super stars who you thinks were starts because they had great speed? 2 Above average players, and 2 below. I was a SS in a diferent era, the other average 2 years per team.</p>
<p>And then you have Juan and Dave sukatude, although both are better then Gardner is now.</p>
<p>Really, you folks come up with the most bizarre and cherry picked examples and try to use them to make a point.<br />
People: OPS &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Speed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OldYanksFan</title>
		<link>http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2008/03/22/breaking-down-the-bench/#comment-282288</link>
		<dc:creator>OldYanksFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 15:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2008/03/22/breaking-down-the-bench/#comment-282288</guid>
		<description>" understand the Yankees barely pinch run, but let us not forget how the Red Sox stile the 2004 series, when that pinch runner stole on Mo."
----------------------------------------------------------
Every year, there are almost 2500 games played. You cite ONE example of when 'speed' made a difference in ONE game, and you wan't to build your roster based on that? Should I go through every box score to find examples of guys who were throw out trying to steal, or guys that won a game with a PH extra base hit?

Unfortunately, speed and defense alone are NOT enough to make a great team like the Yankees. Add excellent hitting (Damon in his prime) or hitting and power (Carl Crawford, ARod, AJax) and NOW you have something.

My guess is Gardner is rated SLIGHTY lower then Melky, who is starting only because Matsui stinks on D, and JD and Mats have had injuries. On top of 4 OFers, we also have FrankenShelly. Our OF is 5 deep. Not great on D or speed, but overall, pretty darn good.

Will Melky get better? Will Gardner get better? If Gardner does get better, maybe we don't resign Bobby and put that $16m into Tex? Is Gardner + Tex &#62; Abreu? Maybe we trade Melky, who has very good value. Maybe AJax and/or Tabata get hurt or turn into duds? Who knows? We need another year or 2 to really know what our 2009/10 OF looks like.

And of couse, while JD and Mats are signed through 2009, either could get injured and just begin to stink. Could 2009 Gardner be better then 2009 JD? Again, who knows.
And there has been talk of trading Mats. He also will have good value (1 yr/$13m)

So what are we 'developing' Brett Gardner for? Simply to see IF he can play a role in our future. That is the question. But that question won't be answered, and it will also stunt Gardner's potential, to have him ride the pine 90% of the time in 2008.

In 2010, Is an OF of Tabata, AJax, Melky and Brett good enough? I guess we will have to wait and see.

P.S.
Dave Roberts has been 'moved' to 5 teams over 9 years.
Juan Pierre has played on 4 teams in 8 years.
How valuable do you think these guys are?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; understand the Yankees barely pinch run, but let us not forget how the Red Sox stile the 2004 series, when that pinch runner stole on Mo.&#8221;<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
Every year, there are almost 2500 games played. You cite ONE example of when &#8217;speed&#8217; made a difference in ONE game, and you wan&#8217;t to build your roster based on that? Should I go through every box score to find examples of guys who were throw out trying to steal, or guys that won a game with a PH extra base hit?</p>
<p>Unfortunately, speed and defense alone are NOT enough to make a great team like the Yankees. Add excellent hitting (Damon in his prime) or hitting and power (Carl Crawford, ARod, AJax) and NOW you have something.</p>
<p>My guess is Gardner is rated SLIGHTY lower then Melky, who is starting only because Matsui stinks on D, and JD and Mats have had injuries. On top of 4 OFers, we also have FrankenShelly. Our OF is 5 deep. Not great on D or speed, but overall, pretty darn good.</p>
<p>Will Melky get better? Will Gardner get better? If Gardner does get better, maybe we don&#8217;t resign Bobby and put that $16m into Tex? Is Gardner + Tex &gt; Abreu? Maybe we trade Melky, who has very good value. Maybe AJax and/or Tabata get hurt or turn into duds? Who knows? We need another year or 2 to really know what our 2009/10 OF looks like.</p>
<p>And of couse, while JD and Mats are signed through 2009, either could get injured and just begin to stink. Could 2009 Gardner be better then 2009 JD? Again, who knows.<br />
And there has been talk of trading Mats. He also will have good value (1 yr/$13m)</p>
<p>So what are we &#8216;developing&#8217; Brett Gardner for? Simply to see IF he can play a role in our future. That is the question. But that question won&#8217;t be answered, and it will also stunt Gardner&#8217;s potential, to have him ride the pine 90% of the time in 2008.</p>
<p>In 2010, Is an OF of Tabata, AJax, Melky and Brett good enough? I guess we will have to wait and see.</p>
<p>P.S.<br />
Dave Roberts has been &#8216;moved&#8217; to 5 teams over 9 years.<br />
Juan Pierre has played on 4 teams in 8 years.<br />
How valuable do you think these guys are?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
