The LoHud Yankees Blog

A New York Yankees blog by Chad Jennings and the staff of The Journal News


Other starters scramble for spots

Posted by: Peter Abraham - Posted in Misc on Dec 10, 2008 Print This Post Print This Post | Email This Post Email This Post

For the top-tier starters remaining on the market — A.J. Burnett, Derek Lowe and Ben Sheets — the signing of CC Sabathia appears to have created some urgency.

The Yankees need at least one starter. The Mets need one. The Braves need one. Maybe the Red Sox do, maybe they don’t. There are only so many large-market teams willing to spend money.

The Yankees are, in Cash-speak, engaging all of them. Burnett is believed to have a five-year offer, Lowe a four-year proposal and Sheets a two-year offer. They definitely want one and could take two. That probably depends on what Andy Pettitte is willing to do.

 
 

Advertisement

48 Responses to “Other starters scramble for spots”

  1. RalphDaddy December 10th, 2008 at 7:55 pm

    I THOUGHT I OVERHEARD HERE IN LOS ANGELES THAT AJ ACCEPTED THE 91MM OFFER?!?

  2. RalphDaddy December 10th, 2008 at 7:57 pm

    **Sorry for the caps**

  3. j2 December 10th, 2008 at 7:57 pm

    Ralph,

    “Overheard”? Context, please.

  4. EvoLuTioN December 10th, 2008 at 7:58 pm

    heyman @ SI reported 5/80 just a few minutes ago.

  5. RalphDaddy December 10th, 2008 at 7:58 pm

    http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/.....id=3761008

  6. Peter Abraham December 10th, 2008 at 7:59 pm

    Just FYI:

    I work for a newspaper, not a web site or a television network. I’m not allowed to use anonymous sources in my stories. I have to things on the record and/or approved by my editors.

    In a place like the Winter Meetings, rumors fly around. It was less than 24 hours ago, people were chastising me for not reporting the rumor that Sabathia has turned the Yankees down. How did that turn out?

    If you want gossip, this really isn’t the place. I try and report the news, not guess at it. I’m not trying to make an excuse, I choose to work where I do. I’m just telling you how it is for me.

  7. Mike R December 10th, 2008 at 7:59 pm

    I posted this in the other thread

    “‘the only 2 and 3 I’m concerned about is which one will be the # of quality seasons we get from him out of a 5yr contract.’

    That’s a gamble you take with anyone you sign. CC pitched almost 500 innings the last two years, is he due to be hurt?

    Lowe has always been healthy, is it his time to break down?

    At the same time, you can say that Burnett has successfully rehabbed from Tommy John. It’s rare that players ever require the surgery twice, maybe his prime is about to begin.”

    I also think that they way the Yankees are handling Pettitte is a foreshadowing of how Jeter’s contract will be handled. Setting the precedent now will make it easier to handle when the time comes.

  8. EvoLuTioN December 10th, 2008 at 7:59 pm

    http://www.fannation.com/si_bl.....-year-deal

  9. Al from BK December 10th, 2008 at 8:00 pm

    “rather ,see the Yankees go into Boston with CC,Wang,Sheets,Perez…Joba 8th inning man(closer of the future)”

    Stop listening to Mike Francessa he is as un-informed as he is fat. Joba is a starter and the bullpen is stacked with late inning stud Mark Melancon waiting in the wings. Putting Joba in the pen would be a complete waste of his talent.

  10. RalphDaddy December 10th, 2008 at 8:00 pm

    I think Lowe, and Sheets would be a better pick up. Rather then Burnette and Sheets…both have history of injury.

  11. Josh Johnson December 10th, 2008 at 8:01 pm

    We get plenty of gossip from around the net anyway, it’s nice to hear we can always count on accurate details and stories from LoHud Yankees.

  12. JMAC December 10th, 2008 at 8:01 pm

    I have a sentimental spot for Andy, but I drool at how dominating and overpowering this rotation would be:

    CC
    Burnett
    Wang
    Joba
    Sheets

    And you always have Hughes to fill in for the inevitable few missed starts by Burnett and Sheets…but when healthy this would be by far the most dominating rotation in baseball.

  13. RalphDaddy December 10th, 2008 at 8:02 pm

    Got it Pete.
    Thanks for the site…. u the man!

  14. Josh Johnson December 10th, 2008 at 8:02 pm

    RalphDaddy,

    Do you not remember the last time Derek Lowe pitched in the AL East? it was a 5+ ERA and got hammered on a consistent basis. He doesn’t have the stuff to pitch in this division.

  15. Phil December 10th, 2008 at 8:03 pm

    Pete,

    I’m sure a lot of us, including me, respect and appreciate that you go about things the right way and use the due diligence that is part of the craft of a truly good and responsible reporter.

    Rock on,

    Phil

  16. vinny-b (bring back Petitte and sign Sheets at 2 yrs) December 10th, 2008 at 8:03 pm

    “I couldnt agree more. What do these signings say about the Yankee drafts the last 6 years? It’s basically an admission they didnt work. They’re going to give a rotation spot for the next 5 years to Burnett at the expense of one of their prospects. After all the lecturing we’ve hears about fans exhibiting patience,they buy a rotation .What message does this send to Kennedy, Aceves and Brackman? Those kids and others are about to be stonewalled”

    Drive 4-5:

    right now Gerrit Cole is believing he made the right decision.

  17. Nick in SF December 10th, 2008 at 8:04 pm

    If you want gossip, this is *totally* the place, just not gossip coming directly from Pete Abe that isn’t labelled as such.

    Heck this is where I first found out that CC had two secret offers besides the NY and Mil. deals. We now know that one of them was from the Governor of Illinois, but what about the other one????

  18. no.27 December 10th, 2008 at 8:05 pm

    Now “other starters are scrambling for spots”. This is why the Yankees should sign Pettitte to the 1 year deal and then sign the player that will take the most reasonable deal.

  19. mko December 10th, 2008 at 8:05 pm

    Both Burnett and Sheets have filthy stuff but might be injury risks. Derek Lowe is pretty good but not on their level. And what everyone seems to be forgetting: When they sign Lowe for 4 years he will be 39 in the last year of his contract. Do you really think he’s going to reinvent himself like Mussina did in the AL East? Possible, but I’d rather have the younger guys…

  20. gayle December 10th, 2008 at 8:05 pm

    Anyone know how the deal with CC suddently got to 161 million. I know for an deal that large the extra 1 mill is not much of a difference bit everyone was at 160 this am and now it is 161.

  21. AROD fan December 10th, 2008 at 8:07 pm

    These offers just sound backwards… Sheets should definitely get more than Lowe.

  22. Boston Dave December 10th, 2008 at 8:07 pm

    “Heck this is where I first found out that CC had two secret offers besides the NY and Mil. deals. We now know that one of them was from the Governor of Illinois, but what about the other one????”

    :)

  23. Mike December 10th, 2008 at 8:09 pm

    Lets forget Petitte . Get Burnett and Sheets and call it a day .

  24. DurhamYankee December 10th, 2008 at 8:10 pm

    The 1 million gives him a yearly average higher than Santana’s. I think

  25. YankeeRay December 10th, 2008 at 8:10 pm

    Mike R
    December 10th, 2008 at 7:59 pm
    I posted this in the other thread

    ”’the only 2 and 3 I’m concerned about is which one will be the # of quality seasons we get from him out of a 5yr contract.’

    That’s a gamble you take with anyone you sign. CC pitched almost 500 innings the last two years, is he due to be hurt?

    Lowe has always been healthy, is it his time to break down?

    At the same time, you can say that Burnett has successfully rehabbed from Tommy John. It’s rare that players ever require the surgery twice, maybe his prime is about to begin.”

    -
    Mike R, you’re right on with this. Watch and see as he is filthy, motivated and getting stronger each year. Remember, he has never played on a really good team. He was on the 2003 Marlin team that won, but that was the year he got hurt. He will be awesome with us.

  26. bru December 10th, 2008 at 8:11 pm

    good players find a way into the rotation or roster.

    if we are set for pitching wich is highly doubtfull we can turn these prospects or players over for position players that are needed or younger prospects.

    we didn’t trade any prospects for the most part in a few years.

    if hughes or any other pitchger is pitching great & lowe stinks then lowe loses his spot or if ajax is on fire he taKES CF.

    the important thing is that we didn’t trade any prospects so if they become good or great they have value wether that is with us or someone else & it will cost a team if they wan’t any of them from us.

  27. Jake December 10th, 2008 at 8:11 pm

    via ESPN.com

    Source: Yankees offering Burnett five-year, $91.5M deal

  28. NO HYPE December 10th, 2008 at 8:11 pm

    Burnett @ 5 yrs and Sheets @ 2 yrs. That would make the starting rotation nasty and when Sheets’ contract expires, Hughes should be more then ready.

  29. AROD fan December 10th, 2008 at 8:12 pm

    Hey Pete,

    Can you pass on my X-mas list to Cash?

    1. CC (check)
    2. Sheets (new addition)
    3. Burnett
    4. Tex
    5. Manny

    Tx

  30. j2 December 10th, 2008 at 8:13 pm

    galye,

    I thought the idea behind the extra mil was to best Santana’s deal.

  31. Jeet Skeet December 10th, 2008 at 8:14 pm

    who rather wait for hughes and kennedy to get it right than have burnett for the next five years?? i kno i would!

  32. Tseng December 10th, 2008 at 8:16 pm

    I’ll pull for AJ as hard as anyone else if he signs with the Yanks, but I really don’t like 91/5

  33. Joe from Long Island December 10th, 2008 at 8:16 pm

    Pete, are you implying that television networks are not reliable sources of news, nor places where reputable journalists are to be found? (lol)

  34. CB December 10th, 2008 at 8:16 pm

    Whether its 5yr/80M or 5yr/90M make no mistake about it – the yankees are paying AJ Burnett to be a #1 starter.

    Doesn’t matter where the technically slots into the context of their rotation.

    At that money they are saying AJ is a true #1 and that they want to have as many “aces” in their rotation as possible.

    They are basically gambling that AJ Burnett is the next Curt Schilling. A pitcher with a ton of talent and great stuff who has underperformed and is ready to turn it around in his early 30′s.

    That’s the gamble.

  35. DurhamYankee December 10th, 2008 at 8:17 pm

    Jake,

    Post the link. Only thing im seeing is that agent is “thought” to be seeking 5/91.5

  36. SJ44 December 10th, 2008 at 8:22 pm

    They aren’t offering 5/91.5.

    Geez, can’t people read?

    It says it’s BELIEVED Burnett’s agent is looking for Zambrano money. It didn’t say the Yankees OFFERED Zambrano money.

    Heyman’s story of 5/80 is probably more in line with the Yankee offer.

  37. no.27 December 10th, 2008 at 8:22 pm

    Signing AJ Burnett means the Yankees are going to pay $50+ million for the rotation long term. They’ve got A-Rod, Jeter, Posada, Cano, and Swisher for $80+ million and $20+ million committed to the bullpen. Doesn’t look like they are trying to cut payroll.

  38. NO HYPE December 10th, 2008 at 8:22 pm

    Hughes and IPK could really use another year or two to develop more pitches (esp Hughes) which can only help them. Sheets could definitely be used as a transition pitcher to accomplish this.

  39. GMAN December 10th, 2008 at 8:24 pm

    Pete,
    Isn’t it peculiar how the Red Sox were not really involved in serious pursuit of CC?

    I mean last year they were going to trade some mighty good prospects to the Twins for Johann Santana and then they’d have to pay him big bucks.

    This year they could have saved the prospects and just spent the dough to bring CC to Boston.

    Sort of illustrates that last year the Red Sox simply wanted to stop Minnesota from trading Johann Santana to the Yanks.

    Once the Yanks pulled their generous offer for Santana…the Sox beck-pedaled and were embarrassed…left Minnesota hanging.

    It will be a long time before the Twins and Red Sox hook up on a big deal.

    The Yanks spent some dough and a draft pick for CC but maintained chips (especially Hughes).

  40. SJ44 December 10th, 2008 at 8:24 pm

    CB,

    Exactly. You might say the Braves are also looking at Burnett in the same way.

  41. j2 December 10th, 2008 at 8:25 pm

    New thread posted.

  42. Jonathan December 10th, 2008 at 8:26 pm

    ESPN.com, is funny:

    “Yanks’ Peavy talks going nowhere”

    Oh really? Trying to create a little news there?

    http://sports.espn.go.com/espn.....tings_2008

  43. CB December 10th, 2008 at 8:29 pm

    SJ,

    No doubt. The thing that has become clear through this process is that both the yankees and the braves have decided that AJ Burnett is a true #1 shut down starter.

    This is even more true for the Braves. The braves do not have $65M to flush away – never mind 70 or 80M.

    Dave O’Brien has written this in the atlanta constitution journal – the braves see him as a #1.

    Bobby Cox loves burnett.

    And its at least good to know that another team likes burnett as much as the yankees do.

  44. Tseng December 10th, 2008 at 8:42 pm

    80/5 isn’t that much better. I would hope the Yanks would try to parlay the CC signing into offering Burnett/Lowe 4 and 3 year deals respectively. I guess it’s not going to happen. I’d much rather do Sheets for two and try to sign Andy than take Burnett or Lowe for 5/4

  45. Phil December 10th, 2008 at 8:43 pm

    I think the Yankee offer is 5/85M.

  46. Drive 4-5 December 10th, 2008 at 8:49 pm

    Wow. I’m really glad to hear it’s ONLY 5/80. I’d feel a lot better if someone could point out 5 years of AJ Burnett’s career when he wasnt injured.

  47. searay December 10th, 2008 at 9:59 pm

    I just understand giving 18 mil a year to Burnett. His stuff just doesn’t translate to the same results. Sign Sheets and Pettitte and allow an opening for the young talent down the road. I would rather add a few mil a year and throw it at Tex than give Burnett that kind of money.

  48. sevrox December 11th, 2008 at 3:52 am

    “Jeet Skeet
    December 10th, 2008 at 8:14 pm
    who rather wait for hughes and kennedy to get it right than have burnett for the next five years?? i kno i would!”

    I’d rather see one of the rooks step up and be given a shot, to be honest. With CC/Wang/Joba/Pettitte (or one other high-dollar FA), I believe that’s enough space for Hughes to work his way onto the rotation. Rather root for the homegrowns.

Leave a comment below

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Forgotten Password
Cancel

Sponsored by:
 

Search

    Advertisement

    Follow

    Mobile

    Read The LoHud Yankees Blog on the go by navigating to the blog on your smartphone or mobile device's browser. No apps or downloads are required.

    LoHud TV

    More Videos

Advertisement

Place an ad

Call (914) 694-3581