Comments on: Clemens to appear on ESPN Radio

By: Jeter's Never Prosper

Jeter's Never Prosper — Tue, 12 May 2009 13:35:14 +0000

Just listened to the podcast of the interview. I don’t know why Roger keeps maintaining that he is innocent. In Canseco’s book, He came out and asked Jose what the stuff was and how to use it. It’s becoming apparent to me that he’s maintain innocence until he has a shot at the Hall Of Fame.

By: Maureen

Maureen — Tue, 12 May 2009 13:15:36 +0000

Roger has his story,and he’s sticking to it..He has no relevancy in the game today,other than,he’s on the “suspected list”…Who really cares..

By: PBL

PBL — Tue, 12 May 2009 03:55:10 +0000

I’m assuming the last two questions are jokes right?

By: The Ghost

The Ghost — Tue, 12 May 2009 03:23:43 +0000

If Pujols never used that really sucks for him because he will always be suspect now because of his gawdy numbers. I really think they have to wipe the records of anyone proven to use off the record books that’s the only way to give the players who never used their somewhat rightful place in baseball history. There was always something odd about the home run kings of the steroid era that seemed really off – like the ball was going much further than their swing or connection warranted.

By: Pepitone's Hairdryer

Pepitone's Hairdryer — Tue, 12 May 2009 03:17:21 +0000

What if Clemens goes on ESPN radio and nobody tunes in?

By: Erik Sec. 309

Erik Sec. 309 — Tue, 12 May 2009 02:30:31 +0000

Don Zimmer tested positive for HGH…..So obvious.

By: kylelitke

kylelitke — Tue, 12 May 2009 02:22:19 +0000

Out of curiosity, why would you put Pujols at 25%? Just because he’s good? Ortiz I get, not because I’m a Yankees fan but because he wasn’t that great, then was an amazing hitter, and now has gotten a lot worse (not that I’m saying he did it, just that I understand the high percentage) but Pujols has always been that good and continues to be that good.

By: kylelitke

kylelitke — Tue, 12 May 2009 02:19:47 +0000

The first three questions are good, but the 4th question is one of those really useless questions that interviewers shouldn’t be asking. The guys who think they’re “tough interviewers” ask questions like that, except those questions NEVER get answered and all they do is get the interviewee pissed off and less likely to answer the other questions. Asking if he can prove McNamee is lying or if he still denies it aren’t really confrontational…they’re “tough questions” but it’s not making a judgement. Asking if the bat throwing was roid rage is one of those trap questions that pisses people off, and it always bothers me when “tough interviewers” ask questions like that. Don’t bother, you won’t get an answer and you will ruin your chance at actually getting a good interview. Use common sense and try to be more subtle about it.

By: Erik Sec. 309

Erik Sec. 309 — Tue, 12 May 2009 00:39:29 +0000

ooooooooooooohhhhhhhhhh……I would love it to be Schilling. Honestly, people that the Yanks championships are tainted are just jealous fools. There was a Macnamee in every single locker room during that era. No team was spared the wrath of liquid strength.

By: RayVT

RayVT — Mon, 11 May 2009 23:49:54 +0000

Possible Steroid Annoucements:
25% – Pujols
25% – Ortiz
5% – Soriano
5% – Berkman
5% – Varitek
5% – K. Youkilis
5% – C. Delgado
5% – M. Ordonez
5% – V. Guerrero
1% – V. Martinez
1% – F. Rod
1% – I. Rod
1% – C. Schilling
1% – B. Myers
1% – J. Dye
1% – J. Thome
1% – P. Konerko
1% – G. Sheffield
1% – H. Blalock
1% – M. Lowell
1% – D. Lee
1% – T. Helton
1% – C. Lee
1% – JJ Hardy
1% – T. Hafner