The LoHud Yankees Blog

A New York Yankees blog by Chad Jennings and the staff of The Journal News


Today in The Journal News

Posted by: Chad Jennings - Posted in Misc on Dec 23, 2009 Print This Post Print This Post | Email This Post Email This Post

The Yankees made their third trade of the month on Tuesday, sending Melky Cabrera and two prospects to the Braves for starting pitcher Javier Vazquez and left-handed reliever Boone Logan. As I wrote for today’s newspaper, general manager Brian Cashman said the Yankees are unlikely to add another “big piece” this winter. With Vazquez in the mix, the bulk of the Yankees offseason shopping might be finished.

As Sam wrote, the Yankees have made moves that will help next season, but they haven’t given up the future in the process. By trading for Vazquez and Curtis Granderson without surrendering Phil Hughes, Joba Chamberlain or Jesus Montero, the Yankees have added big pieces without losing their top young players.

 
 

Advertisement

303 Responses to “Today in The Journal News”

  1. Chambliss December 23rd, 2009 at 8:58 am

    At this point, when Cashman says that something is unlikely to happen the opposite seems likely to occur.

  2. Chris G December 23rd, 2009 at 8:58 am

    I would like to see them add Mark DeRosa though. He plays sound baseball and can play the infield or outfield. He would be a very versatile piece that would enable the Yankees to rest A-Rod from time to time and allow a day orr for some of the outfielders.

  3. YankeeRay December 23rd, 2009 at 8:59 am

    Now Hal has to trade places with Cash and be a GM/Owner for a day and order a Holliday signing. This takes the heat off Cash for saying they are not looking to add a big piece for LF. It also marks the beginning of the Hal era as a true prodige of his dad.
    It is the right fit at the right time but it needs Hals doing.
    Get it done young Steinbrenner.

  4. C December 23rd, 2009 at 9:03 am

    By the way, what’s the deal with Nady? Any chance of adding him?

  5. 86w183 December 23rd, 2009 at 9:06 am

    Certainly Holliday makes this team better, but is it worth the cost of payroll/roster flexibility in 2011? Would you certainly take him over Crawford if that were the choice?

    DeRosa would be a less expensive piece to the puzzle and he could share LF with Gardner while also providing depth elsewhere.

    Another option, more bench oriented would be to try and add Ty Wigginton as a part time DH, utility guy. His AB with Baltimore are now iffy with the signing of Atkins there.

    Marlon Byrd could be a LF option, but beware of guys coming off career years, they tend to get over paid. Still he would be a solid LF, leave Gardner as the 4th OF and give the lineup perfect balance with three LH hitters, three RH hitters and three switch hitters.

  6. Noreaster December 23rd, 2009 at 9:06 am

    I couldn’t help myself last night and did some ‘trolling’ on the Boston Globe blog. Pete was taunting Yankee fans about the Yankee Payroll. I pointed out that the Yankees were much more ‘home grown’…many snarky responses followed. But it struck me (and I really enjoyed Pete!) how much more ‘professional’ this blog reads now.

  7. vinny-b (NJ and Granderson - thank you Cashman!) December 23rd, 2009 at 9:06 am

    “I’d be happy having Gardner and the Rule 5 guy out in left this year. Having some speed and defense in the number 9 hole isn’t a bad thing. Let the team start like it is constructed now and we can always pick up a LF piece during the season if necessary”
    —————————————————–

    this is the most intelligent post, in the last 2 days

  8. 86w183 December 23rd, 2009 at 9:07 am

    I meant to mention Nady… if he’s healthy that’s an even better one-year possibility.

  9. Joltin Joe December 23rd, 2009 at 9:08 am

    Putting Cashman in complete control of this team is paying off dividends. Adding DeRosa for LF won’t be considered a “big signing” but is a smart move, given he can play other defensive positons. Still waiting to see if Johnny comes crawling back and ends up taking a 1yr/5M deal…

  10. Frank December 23rd, 2009 at 9:09 am

    “Would you certainly take him over Crawford if that were the choice?”

    Everyday of the week and twice on Sunday.

  11. blake December 23rd, 2009 at 9:12 am

    This has nothing to so with whether or not the Yankees sign Holliday but you folks that think Crawford is a better player must just be disregarding every stat other than steals and the fact that Crawford (a speed guy ) is entering his 30s and has played his whole career on turf. Even if you make the stretch that Crawford has been the better player to this point, he is much less likely to be moving forward because of the type of player he is.

  12. Grrrrrrrrreat Caesars Ghost December 23rd, 2009 at 9:13 am

    If it were a choice of Crawford or Holliday, I would choose Holliday. Aside from the speed, Holliday just has better numbers. Also you get the upgrade in left a year sooner making it more likely to repeat.

    Crawford isn’t going to be cheaper unless the economy falls even harder than it already has. If the economy improves then Crawford will probably get a higher salary in contract.

    That’s assuming he won’t re-sign with the Rays. Both he and the Rays sound as if they want to stay together.

  13. vinny-b (NJ and Granderson - thank you Cashman!) December 23rd, 2009 at 9:16 am

    Crawford has been Mr DevilRay, like forever. It will be interesting whether he hits the market.

    this we know: either Crawford or BJ Upton will be their team in the future. Not both

  14. 108 stitches December 23rd, 2009 at 9:17 am

    As Sam wrote, the Yankees have made moves that will help next season, but they haven’t given up the future in the process. By trading for Vazquez and Curtis Granderson without surrendering Phil Hughes, Joba Chamberlain or Jesus Montero, the Yankees have added big pieces without losing their top young players.

    Correct Chad and therein lies the real upside to the deals Cashman has made.
    In the case of Boston, they’d desperately like to have Adrian Gonzalez but not at the cost of stripping their farm system of any top prospects. Buchholz would be the front piece of any deal anyplace and puts them in a danger zone if injury happens to Beckett, Lester, Matsuzaka, or Wakefield.

  15. Corey December 23rd, 2009 at 9:18 am

    Totally agree…..Holliday > Crawford. Once Carl’s speed diminishes he’s very one dimensional

  16. ditmars1929` December 23rd, 2009 at 9:19 am

    Please pardon my ignorance on this one, but I’ve read on the blog that Cervelli is projected to be the back up to Posada, but what happened to Molina? Did he leave as a free agent, and where did he sign?

    Thanks.

  17. GreenBeret7 December 23rd, 2009 at 9:20 am

    Given the lack of high dollar/long term offers that holliday has reportedly gotten so far, I’d like to see how much of a gambler he is and sign a 1 year 16 mil deal with incentives an an option. That gives the market a chance to rebound both in dollars and years,

    As far as Crawford goes, as far as I’m concerned, he’s too much of a long term risk. That turf has beaten up his main assets…his legs.

  18. YankeeRay December 23rd, 2009 at 9:21 am

    86w183
    December 23rd, 2009 at 9:06 am
    Certainly Holliday makes this team better, but is it worth the cost of payroll/roster flexibility in 2011?

    ———-

    What payroll flexibility will be needed? If we don’t win then everyone will want a Crawford signing for about the same amount. We don’t even know if he will be available or want to be a Yankee.
    Holliday wants to be a Yankee from all indications or he would have signed already with the Cardinals.
    This just makes too much sense as did the Tex signing.
    He hits to all fields with power, hits for average and despite his gaffe in the playoffs is a pretty good defender.
    Gardner will get plenty of opportunity to play defense for him and or swish late in games as will Hoffman. Hoffman can spell Grandy from time to time against lefties and Gardner will be running once a game for Posada in a double switch move then replacing an OF for defense. Thats flexibility.
    Holliday needs to be in the 5 hole to protect the 4 hitter who for me in this lineup would be Tex.
    Jeter RH
    Johnson LH
    Arod RH
    Tex SH
    Holliday RH
    Posada SH
    Cano LH
    Swisher SH
    Granderson LH
    Is that a flexible line up that will get us #28?
    Payroll flexibility comes next year when Pettitte and Javy come off the books and we look at trading Swishers escalating salary and signing Lee.

  19. vinny-b (NJ and Granderson - thank you Cashman!) December 23rd, 2009 at 9:22 am

    ditmar: Cashman addresed Molina earlier in the off-season. In short, he said if Molina were open to a 1 yr contract, they would be interested. He said, ideally he would like to get Cervelli more at bats in AAA. However, he said if it is not possible, then he knows Cervelli will be ready to go at the ML level

  20. MTU December 23rd, 2009 at 9:22 am

    repost form prior thread:

    Just getting caught up on last nights posts.

    A few random thoughts in passing:

    G.Love, Pitt, Saint, Blake-
    though I dont always agree with you.
    I just wanted to take this opportunity to thank the 4 of you
    for bringing some crisp reasoning and cogency to the board.

    Props to all of you.

    The Lucky Men:

    Hal – for inheriting his father’s vision and passion for winning, and his checkbook.

    Cash- To have the opportunity to achieve GrandMaster status
    playin chess while representing the most storied Franchise in all of sports.

    Joe G- To be handed the keys to drive the most powerful Machine ever built for as long as he can keep it on the road and winning.

    These are some of the lucky men.

    Will anyone else get a chance to come and join them ?

  21. murphydog December 23rd, 2009 at 9:23 am

    I have no problems with the “new” tone. To each his own, really. Sam, Josh and Chad are each pros and having three excellent points of view is just an amazing luxury.

    I don’t think Pete was “unprofessional” or less professional than our current liaisons to The Show, just different. He’s an old-school, hardboiled, curmudgeon in the making.

    http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/curmudgeon

    Truth be told I am becoming very suspicious of words like “professional” and “diversity” because they carry such a heavy overtone but mean such different things to different people and are used primarily as euphemisms. Soon enough they are going to lose their meaning altogether.

    In Pete’s memory, here’s to guys who calls ‘em likes they sees ‘em.

  22. 86w183 December 23rd, 2009 at 9:24 am

    GB 7 —

    I speculated the very same thing earlier in the week or maybe it was over the weekend.

    At some point might Holliday just take a shot on a one year deal, especially somewhere he is certain to be in a pennant race/post season and hope the economy rebounds?

    It seems like any long term deal will pale in comparison to what similar players got in recent years.

  23. blake December 23rd, 2009 at 9:25 am

    Yankeetrader, the Holliday situation is much different than the Teixera situation….Holliday will cost about half as much

  24. ditmars1929` December 23rd, 2009 at 9:28 am

    Thanks, Vinny-B!

  25. ANSKY December 23rd, 2009 at 9:28 am

    This year – Holliday
    Next year – Cliff Lee

  26. vinny-b (NJ and Granderson - thank you Cashman!) December 23rd, 2009 at 9:28 am

    at this time i expect Boston wishes they had not signed Cameron. Holliday could have been signed in his place.

    either this, or Boston does not rate Holliday very high. Strange

  27. GreenBeret7 December 23rd, 2009 at 9:29 am

    murphydog
    December 23rd, 2009 at 9:23 am
    I have no problems with the “new” tone. To each his own, really. Sam, Josh and Chad are each pros and having three excellent points of view is just an amazing luxury.

    I don’t think Pete was “unprofessional” or less professional than our current liaisons to The Show, just different. He’s an old-school, hardboiled, curmudgeon in the making.

    http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/curmudgeon

    Truth be told I am becoming very suspicious of words like “professional” and “diversity” because they carry such a heavy overtone but mean such different things to different people and are used primarily as euphemisms. Soon enough they are going to lose their meaning altogether.

    In Pete’s memory, here’s to guys who calls ‘em likes they sees ‘em.

    ————————————————————

    I have to disagree with using the term “hardboiled, curmudgeon” in referring to PA. That’s reserved as a term of endearment and it’s a hard earned and time honored term.

  28. MTU December 23rd, 2009 at 9:29 am

    Ansky-

    And tommorrow the WORLD !

  29. pat December 23rd, 2009 at 9:29 am

    I take no issue with people who call ‘em like they see ‘em.

    I do take issue with people who mock others for not seeing ‘em like they call ‘em.

    Somehow the idea of aliens landing in Central Park became more of a reality to me after finding this blog. :wink:

  30. blake December 23rd, 2009 at 9:30 am

    MTU,
    I enjoy your posts. Sure they are a little unconventional and imaginative but they are entertaining.

  31. Yankee Trader December 23rd, 2009 at 9:30 am

    As it stands now, I’m reading the current NYY payroll @ 198M. If Yankees indeed want to stay under last years 201M payroll and still sign a LF’er, they can look at dumping either or both of arbitration eligibles Gaudin/Mitre[both might free up 4-4.5M]. for prospects-wouldn’t expect much in return.

    Holliday certainly doesn’t fit into this scenario-I don’t care how creative the Yankees could be.

    DeRosa wants some 5-6M x 2-3 years, is coming off a terrible 2nd half, has a wrist injury and doesn’t fit getting younger but does fit in versatility.

    Byrd will have several offers for three years and we don’t want to tie up that position for three years, with the upcoming 2010 class of FA’s.

    It is known these clubs like Gardner-Royals, Cubs, Padres, and before they traded for Pierre-the White Sox.
    DeJesus makes 4.6M this year with a club option for 6M. Might he fit under the X-mas tree?

    Other less appealling choices, if the Yankees don’t forsee a platoon of Gardner/Hoffmann in Lf is to sign a cheap FA like Gomes or Reed Johnson to fill the slot. Nady had his 2nd TJ surgery qnd who knows if he’ll be able to make throws from the OF.

    Last option is to go to camp with Gardner and Hoffman and see what happens as by then they’ll probably have a choice of free agents not offered major league contracts, or sign an option to a minor league contract.

  32. 86w183 December 23rd, 2009 at 9:30 am

    I’m not convinced Holliday is a better all around player than Crawford. His OPS is significantly higher, but Crawford is the better defensive outfielder and far superior baserunner. He’s also a year and a half younger.

    I’m a greedy guy, though and the lineup with Holliday is flat out sick. The bottom three (Cano, Swish, Grandy) could hit somewhere in the 80-100 HR range.

  33. vinny-b (NJ and Granderson - thank you Cashman!) December 23rd, 2009 at 9:31 am

    pete is definitely not old-skool. Old-skool is peoples like Mike Ditka and Mike Singletary

  34. MTU December 23rd, 2009 at 9:31 am

    Vinny-

    Henry is too cheap ! Except when it comes to himself.

  35. Frank December 23rd, 2009 at 9:32 am

    “At some point might Holliday just take a shot on a one year deal, especially somewhere he is certain to be in a pennant race/post season and hope the economy rebounds?”

    Not very Boras-like. Further, in St. Louis, where a 5 year offer exists, he’s pretty certain to be in a pennant race/postseason scenario. He’s crazy to risk injury in a one year deal, when he has 5 with options. A bird in hand and all. I think the Yankees would have to pony up the full 5 years to make it happen.

  36. Betsy -high on pie December 23rd, 2009 at 9:32 am

    Yes, if given the choice I would take Holliday over Crawford in a heartbeat. That said, we’ve got so many big, long-term contracts and another one would be a concern.

  37. MTU December 23rd, 2009 at 9:32 am

    Blake-

    thanks. You have a future as a Diplomat.

  38. Yankee Trader December 23rd, 2009 at 9:33 am

    Yankeetrader, the Holliday situation is much different than the Teixera situation….Holliday will cost about half as much

    —————————————————-
    blake-

    I think you meant to reply to Yankee Ray.

  39. GreenBeret7 December 23rd, 2009 at 9:34 am

    86w183
    December 23rd, 2009 at 9:24 am
    GB 7 —

    I speculated the very same thing earlier in the week or maybe it was over the weekend.

    At some point might Holliday just take a shot on a one year deal, especially somewhere he is certain to be in a pennant race/post season and hope the economy rebounds?

    It seems like any long term deal will pale in comparison to what similar players got in recent years.

    ————————————————————

    It really does make sense for both parties. It makes him drive hard to boost his numbers in a contract year and I can’t think of a better team for him to jack up his numbers than hitting #5 in this lineup. seems like a win/win to me.

  40. vinny-b (NJ and Granderson - thank you Cashman!) December 23rd, 2009 at 9:35 am

    yankee trader:

    of the above options i definitely believe Nady is the ideal one. A 1 year incentive offer to get his value up. He will not get any better offers till next year. And Nady is a proven NY player

    Nady, Gardner, Hoffmann = not bad at all

  41. Betsy -high on pie December 23rd, 2009 at 9:35 am

    I only recall Cash saying that Molina is an injury risk – that he can’t play too often without getting hurt himself. That’s not a good quality in a backup catcher.

  42. Chris from NJ December 23rd, 2009 at 9:36 am

    There will be a ton of LF types available in January for Cash to pick from. I don’t see Gardner as an everyday OF, though I wish he were, I love his defense and speed. I see the Yankees trading Gaudin (who has actual value because he’s pretty good), and signing someone left without a chair when the music stops for 2-4M 1 year. I remember that LF was a revolving door for the Yankees for a long time before Matsui, and it didn’t hurt them one bit with big hitters like Bernie and O’Neil in CF and RF.

    We don’t need Holliday, and I don’t want a team where everyone is on a 5-8 year deal. Those are untradable contracts.

  43. Betsy -high on pie December 23rd, 2009 at 9:37 am

    Nady doesn’t interest me at all. He’s not that good and the man has had 2 TJ surgeries….no thanks.

    GB, I would not be interested in Holliday for only 1 year…What’s the point? To go through the LF merry-go-round again? We’d have the same issue next year that we do this….

  44. MTU December 23rd, 2009 at 9:38 am

    GB-

    with respect to your idea on Holliday I cite my answer as follows. It is based on a song you might remember.

    “I dig sixteen tons and what do I get ……”

  45. Chris from NJ December 23rd, 2009 at 9:39 am

    of the above options i definitely believe Nady is the ideal one. A 1 year incentive offer to get his value up. He will not get any better offers till next year. And Nady is a proven NY player
    ——————————————————–
    Vinny-b, Nady is a proven NY player, for the Mets maybe? He regressed in the half season he played here after coming from Pittsburgh. I’m not saying he’s a bad player, but he really hasn’t showcased anything as a Yankee IMO.

  46. Paco Dooley December 23rd, 2009 at 9:39 am

    In defense of Pete Abe – as annoying as some of his writing habits may be, his comments were always more insightful than what you get from anyone else. His ability to see the logic of a situation is excellent and I always felt like I was reading some truly useful insights.

  47. Blackaccord December 23rd, 2009 at 9:39 am

    From Pete’s twitter,

    Now that the #Yankees have made another move, expect the #Mets to sign another backup catcher any minute now.
    about 21 hours ago from TweetDeck

  48. Vrsce December 23rd, 2009 at 9:40 am

    I’m a greedy guy, though and the lineup with Holliday is flat out sick.
    ==================================================

    This type of thinking is exactly the Yankees are despised by a large section of the baseball world.
    The team as it currently stands is far superior to any other MLB team. Enough already.

  49. Yankee Trader December 23rd, 2009 at 9:40 am

    At some point might Holliday just take a shot on a one year deal, especially somewhere he is certain to be in a pennant race/post season and hope the economy rebounds?
    ————————————————
    You both make a good point.

    If the Yankees were to give him a large signing bonus and a contract with easily reached incentives, does that possibly fit within their salary structure to stay under 200M AAV? However with Werth and Crawford possibly not signed to extensions and being on the FA market, will this make him a less valuable piece as a FA next year?

  50. Patrick December 23rd, 2009 at 9:41 am

    I think the best option for the Yanks in LF is Marlon Byrd.

    He is above average at the plate and maybe slightly above average in a corner OF spot. Plus he only made 3 mil and change last year so he might accept a deal for 5-7 million.

  51. vinny-b (NJ and Granderson - thank you Cashman!) December 23rd, 2009 at 9:41 am

    “Not very Boras-like. Further, in St. Louis, where a 5 year offer exists, he’s pretty certain to be in a pennant race/postseason scenario. He’s crazy to risk injury in a one year deal, when he has 5 with options. A bird in hand and all. I think the Yankees would have to pony up the full 5 years to make it happen”
    —————————————————-
    I agree. The world economy is uncertainty. Take the money and run. If Holliday’s offers were from lesser places (think Washington Nationals, Mets etc) expect i would view it differently. However ST Louis is a very desirable place to play

  52. blake December 23rd, 2009 at 9:41 am

    yankeetrader, sorry bout that.

  53. GreenBeret7 December 23rd, 2009 at 9:41 am

    Betsy -high on pie
    December 23rd, 2009 at 9:37 am
    Nady doesn’t interest me at all. He’s not that good and the man has had 2 TJ surgeries….no thanks.

    GB, I would not be interested in Holliday for only 1 year…What’s the point? To go through the LF merry-go-round again? We’d have the same issue next year that we do this….

    ————————————————————

    It does a couple of things, Betsy. It gives NY a chance to see if Holliday has problems under the microscope of NY, it allows NYY to find a better answer and it buys NYY time for their kids to develop.

  54. Betsy -high on pie December 23rd, 2009 at 9:44 am

    I don’t care what other teams and other fans think and I don’t think we’re greedy for wanting Holliday; I don’t think the Yankees would be greedy for getting him either. There’s nothing wrong with wanting to improve and we have a need at LF. This is not like suggesting we get David Wright to back up Alex Rodriguez

  55. 86w183 December 23rd, 2009 at 9:45 am

    It would not be a concern to have multiple guys sharing LF, but an upgrade over Gardner and Hoffman would be nice.

    It might make the most sense to build the bench with the ability to play LF in mind. That’s why trading for Ty Wigginton is something I would love to see happen. He’s only 32, plays a ton of positions and unlike DeRosa is only gonna cost one year and $ 3 Mill plus whatever B-list prospect Baltimore wants

    Where is this myth of the too many long term contracts coming from? there are only five guys with guarantees for 2012… Alex, Tex, CC, AJ and Granderson. Dassitt

    Swisher and Cano have options only with inexpensive buyouts. Jeter and Rivera, obviously TBA.

  56. MaineYankee December 23rd, 2009 at 9:45 am

    One advandagte to signing Holliday versus waiting for Crawford is what the market appears to be this yr compared to what it appears like it could be next yr.

    The teams in the market for Holliday seem few so there’s less competion. The RS will have more room for payroll next yr so they could possibly be in on Crawford as well which will drive the price up. Also if the economy improves it adds more teams in the mix for Crawford.

    Cashman seems to have a good handle on what’s ahead when he makes decisions.

  57. Will December 23rd, 2009 at 9:45 am

    An unidentified scout was quoted in the News this morning as giving the edge to CC over Beckett and Vasquez over Dmat while rating Lester over Pettitte and Lackey over AJ. Fair enough, I suppose. But can he be serious about this:

    The Scout Says: “I don’t care if it’s Chamberlain or Hughes who’s the Yankees’ No. 5, I’ll take Buchholz over both of them.

    Edge: Red Sox

    Thoughts?

    Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/spo.....z0aVriduDr

  58. Betsy -high on pie December 23rd, 2009 at 9:46 am

    GB, it’s an interesting proposal and one that Holliday might want to consider, but the Yankees? They don’t have any OF prospects that are less than 3 or 4 years away, so I’m not sure how much it would help us.

  59. vinny-b (NJ and Granderson - thank you Cashman!) December 23rd, 2009 at 9:46 am

    “Vinny-b, Nady is a proven NY player, for the Mets maybe? He regressed in the half season he played here after coming from Pittsburgh. I’m not saying he’s a bad player, but he really hasn’t showcased anything as a Yankee IMO”
    ————————————————-
    correct. He has proven nothing as a Yankee Personally, i view Nady as a very vanilla player, doesn’t do any 1 thing great. However, compare to what we know is available, he looks to be ideal on a 1 yr incentive contract

  60. Chip December 23rd, 2009 at 9:46 am

    I don’t know if it has been said yet, but Cashman was on MLB Network last night and intimated that another signing was on the horizon. That he couldn’t (wouldn’t) comment on it until the team makes it official and all the i’s are dotted and t’s are crossed but that it’s something that won’t be unexpected when it’s announced. It’s possible he was just talking about the Nick Johnson deal but Verducci believes it will either be Mark DeRosa or a 1 year deal for either Vlad or Dye to play RF and shift Swisher to LF.

    He (Cashman) also said that the door is completely closed on Johnny Damon.

  61. vinny-b (NJ and Granderson - thank you Cashman!) December 23rd, 2009 at 9:46 am

    MTU: henry ?

  62. YankeeRay December 23rd, 2009 at 9:47 am

    Vrsce
    December 23rd, 2009 at 9:40 am
    I’m a greedy guy, though and the lineup with Holliday is flat out sick.
    ==================================================

    This type of thinking is exactly the Yankees are despised by a large section of the baseball world.
    The team as it currently stands is far superior to any other MLB team. Enough already.
    ——-

    Oh and if we don’t sign Holliday everyone will see us differently?
    Lets just stick em now and throw the haymaker. We are the richest team in baseball and play by the rules. F em all and go for 28 because thats what we all want. It would be nice to win with rookies but Bostons rotation is very good and our lineup is in need of a better 5 hitter.
    So are we all looking for a low budget answer in LF so others won’t look at us like they will anyway?
    I ran into a Red Sox fan last week and I said nice signing of Lackey, now you guys are approaching our payroll at 170mm. His response was no we’re going down in payroll and you are going up? Perception is a funny thing. Go get Holliday and lets go get #28 already.

  63. MTU December 23rd, 2009 at 9:47 am

    Betsy-

    The most beautiful and majestic bird need not fear being knocked off of it’s perch by common swallows.

    They are only a nuisance which hardly causes the Eagle to blink.

  64. GreenBeret7 December 23rd, 2009 at 9:47 am

    Chris from NJ
    December 23rd, 2009 at 9:36 am
    There will be a ton of LF types available in January for Cash to pick from. I don’t see Gardner as an everyday OF, though I wish he were, I love his defense and speed. I see the Yankees trading Gaudin (who has actual value because he’s pretty good), and signing someone left without a chair when the music stops for 2-4M 1 year. I remember that LF was a revolving door for the Yankees for a long time before Matsui, and it didn’t hurt them one bit with big hitters like Bernie and O’Neil in CF and RF.

    We don’t need Holliday, and I don’t want a team where everyone is on a 5-8 year deal. Those are untradable contracts.

    ————————————————————

    Please provide this great list of future left fielders for NYY to draw on. Crawford is the only known and acceptable name.

  65. vinny-b (NJ and Granderson - thank you Cashman!) December 23rd, 2009 at 9:47 am

    did anyone see Damon kiss that broad? Dan Plesaac is a hilarious :)

  66. trisha - OPPC forever - (new lucky picture from last day at the old Stadium) BRING ON THE GHOSTS! December 23rd, 2009 at 9:48 am

    As someone who ended up a target for Pete’s vitriol on more than one occassion – mostly for having the audacity to have different opinions from his and sticking with those opinions – I have to say that I much prefer the genteel approach brought by the three tenors. In addition, they keep us up-to-date and informed. I don’t need to be highly entertained in the process. They write well, they are articulate, and they are kind in their approach. That definitely works for me!

    ****************

    As someone who is seldom at odds with anything the Yankee organization decides to do, I have to go on record as saying that I think the Vasquez signing comes with a ton of question marks. It isn’t about Mleky being traded, despite my love for the kid. It’s about thinking that a leopard doesn’t change its spots. I don’t think Vasquez was cut out for the Bronx. I don’t know that those things manage to right themselves. Time will tell, but this is one signing that makes me entirely uneasy.

  67. Betsy -high on pie December 23rd, 2009 at 9:48 am

    Oops, GB -I missed that part about it giving time for the Yanks to find a better answer. Interesting…..I don’t see it happening, though….esp. on Holliday’s end.

  68. Yankee Trader December 23rd, 2009 at 9:48 am

    It does a couple of things, Betsy. It gives NY a chance to see if Holliday has problems under the microscope of NY, it allows NYY to find a better answer and it buys NYY time for their kids to develop.
    ———————————————————-

    GB7 and Betsy-

    I see the advantage for the Yankees but don’t really see the advantage for Holliday in not taking the sure thing now.

  69. MTU December 23rd, 2009 at 9:49 am

    Vinny-

    Isn’t he the owner of the Sox.

    he treats his team like one of his hedge funds IMO.

    Tin Man- needs to find a heart so his team can find one.

  70. GreenBeret7 December 23rd, 2009 at 9:50 am

    Betsy -high on pie
    December 23rd, 2009 at 9:46 am
    GB, it’s an interesting proposal and one that Holliday might want to consider, but the Yankees? They don’t have any OF prospects that are less than 3 or 4 years away, so I’m not sure how much it would help us.

    ————————————————————

    Depends on how far kids like Daniel Brewer, Krum, Curtis and a couple of others can advance this coming year.

  71. Chip December 23rd, 2009 at 9:50 am

    I think the best option for the Yanks in LF is Marlon Byrd.

    Patrick -

    I have mixed emotions about Byrd. On the one hand he is a solid defensive option. On the other he has only had one really average/above average offensive season in his career and that was last year.

    True the same could be said about DeRosa and Byrd has better defensive skills than DeRosa.

  72. vinny-b (NJ and Granderson - thank you Cashman!) December 23rd, 2009 at 9:50 am

    MTU: may bad. It is early yet : )

  73. tex's friend December 23rd, 2009 at 9:51 am

    Will, Whoever said Buchholz over Joba/Hughes is an idiot.

    If the only games Buchholz has to play are against the jays and orioles, then sure. But Clay has 1 win not against those two teams.

  74. Joe from CT December 23rd, 2009 at 9:51 am

    There is no way Vlad plays RF. The guy can hardly run

  75. stuckey December 23rd, 2009 at 9:52 am

    If the Yankees were to give him a large signing bonus and a contract with easily reached incentives, does that possibly fit within their salary structure to stay under 200M AAV?

    _________________________

    I think creative accounting is beside the point. This isn’t the NFL or NBA where teams do what they can do work around cap rules.

    If indeed the $200 rule exists, that’s just a thumbnail representation of what the Yankees would like or like not to spend this year.

    I don’t think moving signing bonuses or including incentive to other columns in the ledger is the point.

  76. MTU December 23rd, 2009 at 9:52 am

    Vinny-

    no worries.

    It may be early for you but it is getting late for some.

  77. GreenBeret7 December 23rd, 2009 at 9:53 am

    Yankee Trader
    December 23rd, 2009 at 9:48 am
    It does a couple of things, Betsy. It gives NY a chance to see if Holliday has problems under the microscope of NY, it allows NYY to find a better answer and it buys NYY time for their kids to develop.
    ———————————————————-

    GB7 and Betsy-

    I see the advantage for the Yankees but don’t really see the advantage for Holliday in not taking the sure thing now.

    ————————————————————

    I can see a .330 average with 40 doubles, 35 homers and 120 RBI in this lineup. That would put him in Teixeira numbers. Where he could really help himself is working on the defensive part of his game.

  78. vinny-b (NJ and Granderson - thank you Cashman!) December 23rd, 2009 at 9:53 am

    “There is no way Vlad plays RF. The guy can hardly run”
    ————————————————-
    agree. NYY was not open to Matsui playing in the field, but they’re going to get Vlad to play outfield. Yeah that makes sense

  79. 86w183 December 23rd, 2009 at 9:54 am

    We don’t really know that Holliday has a legit five year guarantee from the Cardinals. There have been mulitiple articles that the back end may involve some vesting and that the $$$ are in the $ 15-16/yr range, far below his hopes for compensation.

    Byrd is an ideal fit, but I don’t think the Yanks will go multi-year unless its for a big time performer. Byrd will get too much after a year in which he doubled his previous high in HR, topped 70 RBI (89) for the first time and had 65 extra base hits after never having more than 42 before.

  80. MTU December 23rd, 2009 at 9:56 am

    The new yankee’s way:

    younger, faster, more athletic

    And

    even more powerful.

    The new Murderer’s Row:

    Texeira
    A-Rod
    Holliday

    Could be one for the Ages.

    Hey, it’s a new ballpark isn’t it ?

  81. m December 23rd, 2009 at 9:56 am

    The funniest thing that I read yesterday was somebody didn’t want Carl Crawford because he’s aging. Like right now!

    Anyway, would be fine with DeJesus, DeRosa, Bay (can we say 2 years?), or Gardner/Hoff/??, Nady.

    I mean, we were prepared to go to war with Melky. We don’t need a significant outlay to get a very good LF.

    Stafon Johnson (USC weightlifting accident) is speaking. Sounds like he’s got a bad case of laryngitis, but that’s just a wonderful development.

  82. stuckey December 23rd, 2009 at 9:56 am

    Betsy, you see my question from last night?

    Purely curious about who you see as a low-tier, 3rd outfielder type, that you believe is a solid enough player to bat in the bottom third of your order.

    Not necessarily a FA or someone the Yanks can get in a trade market, just trying to get a sense of a relatively lower cost option you hypothetically would be comfortable in left field, with the team as presently constituted?

  83. upstate kate December 23rd, 2009 at 9:57 am

    I don’t think Cash would have traded Melky w/o having a LF in mind…altho Gardner was the CF starter last year.
    From the mlb hot stove program’s interview w/ Cash it did sound like Johnny is not coming back. I agree Vinny, the WWE clip showing Damon being mauled was hysterical.
    It will be interesting to see what Cash’s next move is.

  84. Bronx Jeers December 23rd, 2009 at 9:58 am

    Length of current Yankee contracts:

    ARod – 8 yrs
    Tex – 7 yrs
    CC – 6 yrs
    AJ – 4 yrs
    Grandy – 3 yrs
    Jorge – 2 yrs
    Cano – 2 yrs
    Swish – 2 yrs
    Marte – 2 yrs
    Jeter – 1 yr
    Mo – 1 yr
    Nick J – 1 yr
    Andy – 1 yr
    Javier – 1 yr

  85. vinny-b (NJ and Granderson - thank you Cashman!) December 23rd, 2009 at 9:58 am

    I agree Vinny, the WWE clip showing Damon being mauled was hysterical.
    ——————————————
    lol :)

  86. CountryClub December 23rd, 2009 at 9:59 am

    An unidentified scout was quoted in the News this morning as giving the edge to CC over Beckett and Vasquez over Dmat while rating Lester over Pettitte and Lackey over AJ. Fair enough, I suppose. But can he be serious about this:

    The Scout Says: “I don’t care if it’s Chamberlain or Hughes who’s the Yankees’ No. 5, I’ll take Buchholz over both of them.

    Edge: Red Sox

    Thoughts?

    ————–

    The problem with this is that he’s matched up the wrong pitchers. Lester is now the Sox #1. He and CC are a wash. Beckett and AJ are closer than you think. But AJ’s too inconsistent. I give that to the Sox. I think Pettitte and Lackey are a wash. I think Vazquez is better than DiceK. And there’s no way to tell who is better between the three kids. All have had success as starters and all have been awful.

    Honestly, I think it’s a push between the staffs.

  87. Patrick December 23rd, 2009 at 9:59 am

    “On the other he has only had one really average/above average offensive season in his career and that was last year.”

    That’s actually untrue. He’s had 4 average/above average years. 2003, 2007, 2008, 2009

  88. GreenBeret7 December 23rd, 2009 at 10:01 am

    m
    December 23rd, 2009 at 9:56 am
    The funniest thing that I read yesterday was somebody didn’t want Carl Crawford because he’s aging. Like right now!

    Anyway, would be fine with DeJesus, DeRosa, Bay (can we say 2 years?), or Gardner/Hoff/??, Nady.

    I mean, we were prepared to go to war with Melky. We don’t need a significant outlay to get a very good LF.

    Stafon Johnson (USC weightlifting accident) is speaking. Sounds like he’s got a bad case of laryngitis, but that’s just a wonderful development.

    ————————————————————

    I don’t think anyone said he was aging. It was more of a concern with the pounding his legs have taken over the years, both in the field and on the bases.

  89. Betsy -high on pie December 23rd, 2009 at 10:01 am

    The scout makes it sound like CC and Beckett are close – he’s nuts.

    I don’t know what to say about Bucholz. At least the kid had a run of good starts – though 99% of them were against the Os and Jays. Joba was Joba outside of 3 starts (so that’s not good) and Phil pitched most of the year out of the pen.

  90. m December 23rd, 2009 at 10:01 am

    I agree with CC, the staffs are a push. But top to bottome, 1-25, the Yankees are the better team. That’s the only scouting report/comparison I need. Again, people had us finishing 3rd. In the East.

  91. Patrick December 23rd, 2009 at 10:02 am

    We talked about the Yanks vs Red Sox rotation yesterday.

    Sabathia vs Lester – advantage Sabathia (look @ innings pitched)

    Burnett vs Beckett – advantage Beckett, although both are inconsistent

    Pettitte vs Lackey – advantage Lackey

    Vazquez vs Matsuzaka – advantage Vazquez

    Chamberlain/Hughes vs Wakefield/Bucholz – I think you have to give advantage to the Yankees here

    The true way to do it would be to add up the runs saved over replacement for both starting staffs and compare that number.

  92. m December 23rd, 2009 at 10:02 am

    No, GB7.

    Plenty people said what you’re implying, but someone made like he’s old right now. But Holliday wasn’t. Was pretty entertaining. I think it was a brain fart.

  93. MTU December 23rd, 2009 at 10:04 am

    Delusion of Grandeur:

    some of you might wish to be crazy like me in the following way:

    Jeter
    NJ
    Tex
    A-Rod
    Holliday
    Po
    Grandy
    Cano
    Swish

    Right now I dont have to accept reality. I can still dream, right ?

    Doesn’t hurt to dream. Everyone averages six per night.

    And I’ve even heard it told that they even make the World go round.

  94. Betsy -high on pie December 23rd, 2009 at 10:04 am

    Stuckey, I don’t have any other options, I wish I did. However, I’m sure Cash does. I just don’t like Gardner as a player. Could we start with him and then try and make a deal later? Possibly, but teams will try to hold us up once it’s apparent (though it’s apparent to me now) that BG just can’t hack it. I’m not asking for a batting champ in LF or as 9th place hitter, but Gardner is truly awful. Even his speed is overrated in the sense that he has no instincts whatsoever.

  95. mick December 23rd, 2009 at 10:04 am

    Dejesus in the 2 hole behind Jeter isn’t completely stupid.

  96. Doreen - Ain't it Just "Grand"? December 23rd, 2009 at 10:07 am

    Vazquez was a very, very good pitcher for the Yankees in the first half of that season. I think 10-5 was his record and he was on the All-Star team.

    He had a very poor second half and an unfortunate playoff game.

    I dare say AJ himself had an unfortunate playoff game this season.

    And Mariano’s had a couple of missteps in the playoffs himself.

    I think Vazquez’ entire body of work speaks more eloquently than a half a season and one game in the Bronx.

    I wished he was given the chance to bounce back in ’05, but the boss wanted Randy Johnson instead.

    I also believe in redemption and second chances, in growing into “the job,” of being able to learn the craft of pitching from the age of 28 to the age of 33 (as opposed to merely throwing), and learning from one’s mistakes (not telling anyone he had discomfort in his shoulder) and fresh starts.

  97. m December 23rd, 2009 at 10:07 am

    Sorry, GB7, I think the person implied CC was old, not aging.

  98. Jay December 23rd, 2009 at 10:07 am

    Just listened to wfan 660 a caller called in adam the bull about 2 new HR calles for John Sterling

    How about these???
    Pls reply with yours

    ST Nick blasts one to Johnsonville
    & the yankees take a ……lead

    That’s a Courtesy shot from granderson & the yanks put the bosox to sleep

  99. GreenBeret7 December 23rd, 2009 at 10:08 am

    No, GB7.

    Plenty people said what you’re implying, but someone made like he’s old right now. But Holliday wasn’t. Was pretty entertaining. I think it was a brain fart.

    ————————————————————

    I must have missed that little bit of enlightenment, Mel.

  100. Doreen - Ain't it Just "Grand"? December 23rd, 2009 at 10:09 am

    I agree with Country Club and m about the comparability of the two starting rotations.

  101. bobshantz December 23rd, 2009 at 10:09 am

    How do Holliday, Bay, and Nady rank as defensive outfielders?

  102. stuckey December 23rd, 2009 at 10:09 am

    The way the outfield market is shaping up, there will likely be an option out there that can be had on a low-cost, one-year flier.

    A name that never seems to be mentioned here is Ankiel. IF he can prove he’s healthy after last year’s wall collision, he might make for an interesting risk. The guy is young(ish) can field/cover a lot of ground and throw out of his mind, and was a very good offensive player the previous two years and if he regains his form would be deadly in NYS.

    Put him in the 9th hole, don’t ask him to be a run producer, and you could catch lightning in a bottle.

    Strikes out a ton though, even on his good days.

  103. mick December 23rd, 2009 at 10:09 am

    Vasquez is our 4th starter.
    No one has a 4th starter as good as him.

  104. tex's friend December 23rd, 2009 at 10:10 am

    In comparing the sox starters, did someone leave our Wakefield?

  105. Joe from CT December 23rd, 2009 at 10:11 am

    Betsy -high on pie December 23rd, 2009 at 10:04 am

    Stuckey, I don’t have any other options, I wish I did. However, I’m sure Cash does. I just don’t like Gardner as a player. Could we start with him and then try and make a deal later? Possibly, but teams will try to hold us up once it’s apparent (though it’s apparent to me now) that BG just can’t hack it. I’m not asking for a batting champ in LF or as 9th place hitter, but Gardner is truly awful. Even his speed is overrated in the sense that he has no instincts whatsoever.

    —————–

    Wow Betsy me and you actually sort of agree on something

    Im in shock!!

  106. Patrick December 23rd, 2009 at 10:12 am

    “How do Holliday, Bay, and Nady rank as defensive outfielders?”

    From memory, Holliday is above average in LF, Bay is very bad in LF, Nady is about average.

  107. GreenBeret7 December 23rd, 2009 at 10:12 am

    mick
    December 23rd, 2009 at 10:04 am
    Dejesus in the 2 hole behind Jeter isn’t completely stupid.

    ————————————————————

    Who do you plan on giving up for Dejesus? I can’t imagine they’ll take Gardner. Kidnapping is illegal. If they trade another high value minor league arm, this place will explode.

  108. Chip December 23rd, 2009 at 10:12 am

    As the person who has probably been banging the DeJesus drum louder than anyone I will say it’s very unlikely that he winds up with the Yankees at this point.

    Brian has made two very significant trades and I don’t think he wants to make any more than that and risk depleting the uppers levels of the farm system.

    A trade for DeJesus would likely involve Brett Gardner and either Nova or Aceves as starting points. With Melky gone that would leave Rule V pick up Jamie Hoffmann and Colin Curtis as the only viable OF back-ups and with Kennedy gone a deal of Nova or Aceves would leave the AAA level pretty pitching thin in case of an injury to a starter. True they have Gaudin and Mitre but I just don’t see it happening.

    I think at this point a more likely scenario has the Yankees picking up a FA outfielder – whether that’s a Ryan Church, Randy Winn, Mark DeRosa, Marlon Byrd – I don’t know. I do think the odds are very very slim that it will be Holliday or Bay and almost nil that it will be Damon.

    By the way, I don’t think it will be Vlad, I was just saying that he was Verducci’s pick.

  109. upstate kate December 23rd, 2009 at 10:14 am

    not a HR call, but I always got a chuckle on sports center highlights when they would say “its not an Anderson, its a GRANDerson”

    GB7- are you still smoke free?

  110. Chip December 23rd, 2009 at 10:14 am

    How do Holliday, Bay, and Nady rank as defensive outfielders?

    Of the three, Holliday is the best, Bay would be the worst, except for the fact that coming off a second Tommy John operation I’m not entirely sure Nady can throw.

    Another name to keep in mind would be Rick Ankeil. Easily the best defensive outfielder still available and with his swing in Yankee Stadium he would likely put up some significant offensive numbers.

  111. stuckey December 23rd, 2009 at 10:15 am

    Betsy, not asking you for someone the Yankees could likely acquire. You can pick ANY outfielder in baseball you see as an acceptable everyday player but still a bottom of the order type.

    Are there ANY outfielders in baseball you view as filling a role like that, or should all outfielders be speedy top-of the order CF types, or corner middle of the order run producers?

    Name ANY outfielder you’d be cool with batting 9th and playing LF for the Yankees.

  112. GreenBeret7 December 23rd, 2009 at 10:15 am

    Patrick
    December 23rd, 2009 at 10:12 am
    “How do Holliday, Bay, and Nady rank as defensive outfielders?”

    From memory, Holliday is above average in LF, Bay is very bad in LF, Nady is about average.

    ————————————————————

    Nady is as bad as Bay is defensively, and he has a bum arm.

  113. MTU December 23rd, 2009 at 10:16 am

    Everybody knows what a “Granderslam” is. Dont they.

  114. m December 23rd, 2009 at 10:17 am

    Chip,

    Good thoughts. Ankiel and Gardner I like. D-Fence. D-Fence. (and won’t cost years & money). And I’d rather see Ankiel in a relief appearance before the Swish. :P

  115. m December 23rd, 2009 at 10:18 am

    lol. Is Stuckey trying to imply that Betsy is particular?

    Betsy, are you picky when it comes to men, too? ;)

  116. stuckey December 23rd, 2009 at 10:18 am

    Hey, I said Ankiel first… check the tape :-)

  117. GreenBeret7 December 23rd, 2009 at 10:19 am

    upstate kate
    December 23rd, 2009 at 10:14 am
    not a HR call, but I always got a chuckle on sports center highlights when they would say “its not an Anderson, its a GRANDerson”

    GB7- are you still smoke free?

    ————————————————————

    Depends on what kind of smoke that you’re referring to.

    But, to answer your question…yes, I am, Kate. 10 days now.

  118. MTU December 23rd, 2009 at 10:20 am

    m
    That’s a non-sequitor. doesnt make sense about Betsy.

    everyone knows she can have any man she wants.

  119. trisha - OPPC forever - (new lucky picture from last day at the old Stadium) BRING ON THE GHOSTS! December 23rd, 2009 at 10:20 am

    The problem with Vazquez had to do with his attitude as much as anything else. Perhaps the average bear Yankee fan doesn’t hone in on that stuff. I always do. He didn’t take responsibility for pitching poorly when he unequiovcally started to tank. We’ve all seen where that kind of attitude lands pitchers (see lately: Kennedy, Bruney, Coke).

    If there’s a problem and you don’t think there’s a problem, then there is definitely a problem.

    This has nothing to do with forgiveness or a second chance. It has everything to do with my thinking that like a slew of pitchers before him, Vazquez isn’t cut out to pitch in the Bronx. Of course, here’s hoping I’m wrong.

  120. Patrick December 23rd, 2009 at 10:20 am

    “Nady is as bad as Bay is defensively, and he has a bum arm.”

    True about the arm but he actually has been an average defensive corner OF throughout his career. Who knows what he’ll be like after a second TJ though.

    Ankiel, I don’t like. He’s an average corner OF at best. At worst he’s below average. Not nearly as good as Holliday out there. He also strikes out at a high rate and doesn’t have the OBP to back it up.

  121. Frank December 23rd, 2009 at 10:20 am

    “In comparing the sox starters, did someone leave our Wakefield?”

    As it stands now, he has spot starter status, no?

  122. GreenBeret7 December 23rd, 2009 at 10:21 am

    “It’s another one for Curtis. That’s just grand, son.

  123. Stan December 23rd, 2009 at 10:22 am

    Add another piece to LF and I wouldn’t the slightest bit concerned about going to war tomorrow.

  124. MTU December 23rd, 2009 at 10:23 am

    Oxymoron

    A stupid peron who likes to breathe a lot of fresh air.

    A stupid person who cattle.

    Yankee Budget.

    I rest my case.

  125. MTU December 23rd, 2009 at 10:23 am

    “likes cattle”

  126. m December 23rd, 2009 at 10:23 am

    I exclude Holliday from my lists because I don’t want another large contract. And until someone convinces me otherwise, I’m going to go with the selective memory thing and say he had bad splits when he was with the Rox.

  127. GreenBeret7 December 23rd, 2009 at 10:27 am

    Nady hit the dumps on offense for his last 6 weeks in 2008. as far as defense, Swisher’s a Gold glove in comparison. He couldn’t cover right field, much less left field,

  128. Rich in NJ December 23rd, 2009 at 10:27 am

    “From memory, Holliday is above average in LF, Bay is very bad in LF, Nady is about average.”

    Correct.

  129. Patrick December 23rd, 2009 at 10:27 am

    Marlon Byrd is clearly the best corner OF on the market right now outside of Jason Bay and Matt Holliday.

    The Yankees really just need a guy that can field his position and put up average numbers in LF. Byrd could be had for a pretty reasonable amount of money I think. He’s better than Ankiel, Nady, Winn, etc

  130. MaineYankee December 23rd, 2009 at 10:29 am

    For all the discussion about who plays LF, I think the solution is easier for the Yankees than the RS. The Yankees can get by with a filler while the RS need a big bat.

  131. Erica - always OPPC - Bring Johnny Back!!! December 23rd, 2009 at 10:29 am

    Rich in NJ
    December 23rd, 2009 at 10:27 am
    “From memory, Holliday is above average in LF, Bay is very bad in LF, Nady is about average.”

    Correct.

    ***********

    Just bring back Johnny Damon for a year….. sigh

  132. GMAN December 23rd, 2009 at 10:29 am

    Pete Abe would be a first rate novelist.
    When he’s on his game he is witty, incisive and readable.

    When he is lazy and looking to push buttons he picks on the Yankee payroll, A-Rod, Hank Steinbrenner (or he lauds The N.E. Patriots and hack writers that purport to exhaustively report the facts on A-Rods lifestyle amd Duke LaCrosse).

    Pete is more opinionist than journalist.

    Pete needs to challenge his God-given ability and write a great novel… that’s his gift… hopefully he does not waste the potential.

  133. m December 23rd, 2009 at 10:30 am

    I see Reed Johnson’s name popping up, I thought he signed with somebody?

  134. MTU December 23rd, 2009 at 10:30 am

    Patrick-

    If you’ll accept this from a crazy person. I’ll say i agree with you. As an alternative only.

  135. tex's friend December 23rd, 2009 at 10:30 am

    I want to see Colin Curtis get a shot. I think with the 8 we will put out there, we can afford to see what he’s got.

  136. Bronx Jeers December 23rd, 2009 at 10:30 am

    We’ve all seen where that kind of attitude lands pitchers (see lately: Kennedy, Bruney, Coke).

    ————————————————————–

    Evidently, it lands them on other teams.

    And Javier got traded as well.

    But if IPK, Bruney or Coke have post-trade careers like Javier has had?

    Then I’d be pretty excited to get them back.

    Besides all that “accountability” crap is overrated. You want to be accountable? Pitch better! Then you can say whatever you want.

    And no one was less “accountable” than Joba last season and he’s not going anywhere.

  137. blake December 23rd, 2009 at 10:30 am

    By signing a one year type LFer this year, who would the Yankees be holding the spot for. There is nothing in the minors even close to ready. Next year it would be the same ole thing, either sign another stopgap or go after Crawford or Werth if they are even available.

  138. tex's friend December 23rd, 2009 at 10:30 am

    And Hinske is a FA no?

    Get his for RF and move Swish to left?

  139. ANSKY December 23rd, 2009 at 10:31 am

    Just curious … does Cashman consider Holliday a “big piece”?

  140. tex's friend December 23rd, 2009 at 10:31 am

    or sign Hairston to play regularly in LF. has to be fairly cheap.

  141. Erica - always OPPC - Bring Johnny Back!!! December 23rd, 2009 at 10:32 am

    tex’s friend
    December 23rd, 2009 at 10:30 am
    And Hinske is a FA no?

    Get his for RF and move Swish to left?

    ********

    Hinske was terrible in RF the few times he played. Swisher would replace him defensively in late innings

  142. Patrick from CT December 23rd, 2009 at 10:33 am

    Gardy and Hoffman can start the season in LF as a platoon and see if one can win the job.
    Bring in a RH batting utility guy that can play 3rd and LF to add to the mix.
    Pena can backup SS and 2nd. We have 3 that play first already.
    Gerry Hairston would be a good play to bring back at this point if he’s still out there.

  143. MTU December 23rd, 2009 at 10:33 am

    Blake-

    as usual. You da Man !

  144. m December 23rd, 2009 at 10:34 am

    There’s a funny thing that happens to athletes. They learn from their mistakes. Can we give Vasquez the benefit of the doubt here?

  145. Patrick December 23rd, 2009 at 10:34 am

    “If you’ll accept this from a crazy person. I’ll say i agree with you. As an alternative only.”

    First, I’ll take what I can get, crazy or not!

    Second, as an alternative to whom?

  146. tex's friend December 23rd, 2009 at 10:34 am

    Erica i’m just thinking cheap. Hairston is out there and can play outfield. Wouldn’t mind being here if he played regularly no?

  147. Chip December 23rd, 2009 at 10:34 am

    Vazquez’s problems his first time around were:

    1. He was very young and thrust from a situation where there was absolutely zero pressure to a situation where every start was life or death.

    2. Mel did absolutely nothing to help him because Mel wasn’t really a very good pitching coach for young pitchers.

    3. Torre had no confidence in him and so everytime Javy hit a roadblock Joe was out of the dugout making Javy feel as if he had to pitch a perfect game each time out.

    4. Javy pitched very well in the first half of the season with the Yankees (10-5; 3.5 ERA) and then had a bad second half.

  148. Patrick December 23rd, 2009 at 10:35 am

    Chip,

    5. He hurt his shoulder sometime in the second half.

  149. m December 23rd, 2009 at 10:36 am

    Second, as an alternative to whom?
    ====================================

    lol….

  150. GreenBeret7 December 23rd, 2009 at 10:37 am

    m
    December 23rd, 2009 at 10:23 am
    I exclude Holliday from my lists because I don’t want another large contract. And until someone convinces me otherwise, I’m going to go with the selective memory thing and say he had bad splits when he was with the Rox.

    ————————————————————

    He’s still a .290 road hitter in his career. Yankee Stadium is made for his type of hitter. His power is right/right center field.

  151. Erica - always OPPC - Bring Johnny Back!!! December 23rd, 2009 at 10:37 am

    tex’s friend
    December 23rd, 2009 at 10:34 am
    Erica i’m just thinking cheap. Hairston is out there and can play outfield. Wouldn’t mind being here if he played regularly no?

    ***********

    The idea doesn’t exactly have me jumping up and down with excitement. He is cheap- yes. But let’s be honest- he is very average

  152. MTU December 23rd, 2009 at 10:37 am

    Patrick-

    synonomous with “vacation”

  153. Alan December 23rd, 2009 at 10:38 am

    If a Holliday deal is not to be, why not a one-year deal for FA Randy Winn until Crawford is in sight ?
    A switch hitting Melky can be replaced by a switch hitting Winn who can play all OF positions.

    http://sanfrancisco.giants.mlb....._id=133160

  154. Noreaster December 23rd, 2009 at 10:38 am

    Maybe this has already been posted, but Cashman just said on MLB network that he had one more move to make and he was close. The network analysts were speculating a right handed left fielder…

  155. ArodMVP217 December 23rd, 2009 at 10:38 am

    “The Yankees value Crawford more highly than Holliday. Crawford has strengths in more areas than Holliday (defense, baserunning, better contact hitter, etc). The Yankees have players with strength in the one area that Holliday has strength (power hitting). In short, Carl Crawford is a more disruptive force in a postseason game than Holliday.”

    correct more or less. Sure, Crawford is a bigger baserunning threat, but he gets on base a hell of a lot less than Holliday.

    In this market, Holliday might be a much better value than Crawdaddy in next year’s FA market. shame that they won’t be able to take advantage of that, if in fact they are going to go the FA path as opposed to trade, and we know there is no big LF prospect coming up any time soon. I think with ALL things being equal, $man wants Holliday. things aren’t equal. timing is not right. You want the 4.5 tool player over the 3.5 tools every day

  156. Nud December 23rd, 2009 at 10:38 am

    Chip you are clueless…..Torre was absolutely right in getting Javy ouuta there and not starting him in the playoffs. Javy stunk-bottom line. Let’s see if he can pitch in the AL. You heard what he said about how he liked pitching in the NL…….I am sorry but in your return press conf you say that??? Red flag city……Again, if he is the number 4, then it is all good. If they need him to do more, then there is trouble.

  157. Patrick December 23rd, 2009 at 10:38 am

    I’m actually warming up to the idea that Gardner plays CF, Granderson plays LF.

    It’s far too small a sample but there are indications that Gardner could be a better defender than Granderson.

    Also, again, a far too small sample but I think Gardner could be close to league average at the plate.

  158. MaineYankee December 23rd, 2009 at 10:38 am

    tex’s friend
    December 23rd, 2009 at 10:30 am
    And Hinske is a FA no?

    Get his for RF and move Swish to left?

    ———————————————-

    Have you seen Hinske play the OF?

    There is a reason he has changed teams each yr for the last 3 yrs.

  159. GreenBeret7 December 23rd, 2009 at 10:38 am

    GMAN
    December 23rd, 2009 at 10:29 am
    Pete Abe would be a first rate novelist.
    When he’s on his game he is witty, incisive and readable.

    ————————————————————

    yeah, he’s witty half of the time.

  160. Noreaster December 23rd, 2009 at 10:39 am

    (Oh, and it didn’t sound like a large move…)

  161. Rich in NJ December 23rd, 2009 at 10:39 am

    Erica – always OPPC – Bring Johnny Back!!!

    Would he swallow his pride to the extent that he would accept a one year deal at about $5m? If so, that could happen.

  162. MTU December 23rd, 2009 at 10:40 am

    GB-

    too clever by half ?

  163. Howard Cosell December 23rd, 2009 at 10:41 am

    Down goes Muhammad Musings………

    IS this year that Jeter plays a little LF?
    IS this the Year that Montero gets called up to play some DH?
    DO the Yanks sign Hinske to platoon LF with Gardner?
    Could the Yanks trade Gardiner with no CF backup help?
    Do the Yanks sign happy Hairston to platoon with Gardiner?
    If McAllister continues to dominate the minors does he get called up?
    Can we see the Yanks go with Hoffman/Gardiner and then sign Nagy after the season starts?
    Will jonathan albaladejo ever wear a MLB Yankees uniform again?
    Will Igawa reduce his salary to 1mm and hope to play in the majors?

    HC

  164. m December 23rd, 2009 at 10:41 am

    Well, Granderson said he would play wherever they needed him to play. But I don’t think he envisioned deferring to GGBG. ;)

    I think Granderson can still play an elite CF, but didn’t Gardner have crazy numbers out there this season?

  165. tex's friend December 23rd, 2009 at 10:42 am

    The idea doesn’t exactly have me jumping up and down with excitement. He is cheap- yes. But let’s be honest- he is very average

    ____

    He would be batting 9th in a lineup with 8 allstars. We do not need 9 superstars to win. If hairston can bat .270 /10/50 and fair defense, that would be just fine.

  166. stuckey December 23rd, 2009 at 10:42 am

    Blake, almost all team’s have positions they go year-to-year with.. Red Sox and SS for example, and LF is one of the easiest position to fill.

    The Yankees DO have some outfield prospects in the low minors, Montero’s defensive future is yet to be determined, and no one knows that the trade market will be in future years.

    You don’t sign a player you’re not 100% sold on to big money and multiple years.

    As the team currently stands, offensively it’s the 9th hole they’ll need to fill for the next 1-2 seasons and that can be done. By 2012, options hard to picture right now could present themselves. Maybe Mekly Meas breaks out in AA this year?

    Maybe Heathcott moves through the system rapidly.

    Again, the point is, you don’t sign guys to long-term contracts on their own merits. If the merit doesn’t exist, the baseball landscape has a way of rapidly changing from year to year.

  167. Patrick December 23rd, 2009 at 10:42 am

    “synonomous with “vacation””

    Ahhh…

    He’s not even entering my thoughts right now. I’m just assuming his pay demands are too high for the Yankees at this time.

  168. Chip December 23rd, 2009 at 10:43 am

    Kim Jones on WFAN right now is summing it up perfectly:

    If the Yankees want to add payroll they will. As Hal said at the Granderson presser, “if Brian comes to me with something compelling I’m likely to give him the room to do it” but she doesn’t believe that the Yankees consider either Bay or Holliday compelling players. They are very good compared to what else is available this winter, but they’re not really great players.

    Now, if it’s mid January and Bay and Holliday are still out there and the Yankees haven’t made a move, it’s anyone’s guess.

    But personally I believe the Yankees will wrap this thing up by New Years.

  169. MTU December 23rd, 2009 at 10:43 am

    Patrick-

    Nah !

  170. upstate kate December 23rd, 2009 at 10:44 am

    If some Yankee fans can’t give Vazquez a 2nd chance then they are as bad as sox fans blaming Buckner all those years. I sincerely hope he does not get booed for something that happened 5 years ago. Actually I don’t like booing your own players anyway…in most cases they are trying their best (maybe that is just the mom side of me)

  171. tex's friend December 23rd, 2009 at 10:45 am

    Well, Granderson said he would play wherever they needed him to play. But I don’t think he envisioned deferring to GGBG.

    I think Granderson can still play an elite CF, but didn’t Gardner have crazy numbers out there this season?

    ___

    do we forget gardner DID have the starting job last year, and sucked at the plate? he lasted less than a month before losing his job. then watched him in the playoffs stare at strikes right down the middle.

    it would be a crime to move granderson to fit gardner in.

  172. MTU December 23rd, 2009 at 10:46 am

    Kate-

    I hear the Yankees have a solution for that.

    All the Ushers are now required to carry nail guns.

  173. blake December 23rd, 2009 at 10:47 am

    if the Yankees still had Jackson or someone that could potentially play LF in 2011 in the minors then my opinion my be different than it is. However, that’s not the case so unless they Yankees plan on hiring a different midlevel player every year to play LF then why not fix the problem with a quality player this year and do so at a wholesale price.

  174. Erica - always OPPC - Bring Johnny Back!!! December 23rd, 2009 at 10:47 am

    Rich in NJ
    December 23rd, 2009 at 10:39 am
    Erica – always OPPC – Bring Johnny Back!!!

    Would he swallow his pride to the extent that he would accept a one year deal at about $5m? If so, that could happen.

    *********

    If it came down to swallowing his pride to play for the Yankees or play for the Braves (or some other random team)….. I think he would choose the Yankees

  175. Frank December 23rd, 2009 at 10:47 am

    “Chip you are clueless…..Torre was absolutely right in getting Javy ouuta there and not starting him in the playoffs.”

    Vazquez did start in the ALDS. Yankees won the game, but he wasn’t good.

  176. m December 23rd, 2009 at 10:47 am

    tex,

    I was talking about defensive numbers.

    And no, I didn’t forget anything.

  177. Erica - always OPPC - Bring Johnny Back!!! December 23rd, 2009 at 10:48 am

    Noreaster
    December 23rd, 2009 at 10:38 am
    Maybe this has already been posted, but Cashman just said on MLB network that he had one more move to make and he was close. The network analysts were speculating a right handed left fielder…

    **************

    Johnny Damon??? Johnny Damon??????

  178. mick December 23rd, 2009 at 10:49 am

    maybe the royals dump salary and do gardner for dejesus even up

  179. vinny-b (NJ and Granderson - thank you Cashman!) December 23rd, 2009 at 10:49 am

    “Just bring back Johnny Damon for a year….. sigh”
    ———————————————–
    following that footage of him under the missiletoe, no team wants him

  180. MTU December 23rd, 2009 at 10:50 am

    Blake-

    poor cash.

    he has a shopper’s dilemma.

    What do I do ???????

    Holliday on sale 1/2 off.

  181. Howard Cosell December 23rd, 2009 at 10:50 am

    Part 2

    Will this be the year that Humberto Sanchez finally makes it to the bigs and sticks? I do

    Does Mark Melancon start getting groomed by Rivera as the closer? I do

    Will we see some Pena in the outfield this year? I do

  182. Jeremy December 23rd, 2009 at 10:50 am

    Nud
    I think Javy was really happy to go to the NL because he was able to leave the White Sox because he did not like the situation there with Ozzie.

    Also what pitcher wouldn’t like the NL. Heck CC loved the NL when he was traded to the Brewers and he thought about staying with an NL team.

  183. biz December 23rd, 2009 at 10:51 am

    gardner is the man. his speed gives our line up another dimension and he really makes things happen. i was at the game against the twins when he hit the inside the park home run and started the rally for us. i dont think hes an every day option at this point unless he gets his Avg and OBP up, but he should certainly get some time in the OF. as far as instints hes so fast that he makes up for it. there was 1 instance in the playoffs that he was caught stealing and it hurt the team. he is young though and with some experience he will improve.

  184. m December 23rd, 2009 at 10:51 am

    blake,

    There’s a good chance that a motley crew LF would outperform Jackson. There is no guarantee that Jackson will realize his great potential and be the kind of player Yankee fans wanted him to be.

  185. Rich in NJ December 23rd, 2009 at 10:51 am

    “it would be a crime to move granderson to fit gardner in.”

    If Gardner turns out to be a better CF than Granderson, it would be a “crime” to move him from LF to CF? Really? Isn’t the best plan to put each player in the position that would most help the team win?

    And you state that he sucked at the plate for less than a month?

    Why does less than a month matter more than May and June, when his OPS was .955 and .918, respectively.

    Obviously, if they can get a well-priced upgrade in LF, they should, but if they can’t, it’s hardly a crime to have Gardner in CF if he helps the team win.

  186. Jeremy December 23rd, 2009 at 10:54 am

    Erica
    I think Damon’s time with the Yankees are over. The organization even came out and said that he is not apart of the Yankees plans going forward.

    He played himself out. He should have taken less money but he didn’t, and with the latest moves the Yankees made they are not going to spend more for Damon. I also don’t see Damon asking the Yankees for a contract.

  187. upstate kate December 23rd, 2009 at 10:54 am

    Erica
    Since Cash blew off your birthday, lets hope you get your Christmas wish :)

  188. m December 23rd, 2009 at 10:55 am

    vhttp://msn.foxsports.com/mlbhttp://msn.foxsports.com/mlb

    There’s a poll at the bottom right. You’ll be surprised at the results. Or not.

  189. Jeremy December 23rd, 2009 at 10:55 am

    sorry-part of the Yankees plan going forward.

  190. mick December 23rd, 2009 at 10:55 am

    how about garrett anderson in LF?

  191. ANSKY December 23rd, 2009 at 10:56 am

    Howard Cosell –

    “Will Igawa reduce his salary to 1mm and hope to play in the majors?”

    Funny. His only hope would be to pay back his salary plus every penny of that ridiculous posting fee, then offer to PAY the contract of a new position player such as Holliday (out of his own pocket, instead of himself BEING paid) in order to generate the offense needed to make up for his awful pitching.

    And he’d still have to learn to live with being pulled by the 4th inning most of the time.

  192. Aud Thoughts December 23rd, 2009 at 10:56 am

    LF for 2010 Randy Winn. Switchhitter plays left of right , good defensively with a little speed. 1 yr 3-4 mil

  193. m December 23rd, 2009 at 10:56 am

    don’t know where the ‘v’ came from…

    http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb

  194. vinny-b (NJ and Granderson - thank you Cashman!) December 23rd, 2009 at 10:56 am

    M: remove the v before http

  195. Rich in NJ December 23rd, 2009 at 10:56 am

    m

    The link doesn’t work because of the “v” on the left end.

  196. Patrick December 23rd, 2009 at 10:57 am

    MTU,

    Trust me, I want Holliday. He’s the perfect fit for this team. But this is one case where I actually believe Cashman when he says that the team doesn’t want to add a significant amount of payroll

  197. MTU December 23rd, 2009 at 10:57 am

    Kate-

    Is satisfying erica’s obssession with Damon worth costing the rest of us another Championship.

    I guess love conquers all.

  198. Gardner in CF December 23rd, 2009 at 10:57 am

    I’d be willing to bet Gardner wasn’t swinging much in the playoffs because of his injury. I heard Girardi quoted somewhere that Garder was on the postseason roster for defense, and to run. Before his injury he was splitting time with Cabrera, and when he came back Cabrera was awful but Gardner still wouldn’t crack the starting lineup. Even the games where the matchups favored Gardner and everyone thought he would start he didn’t. I think his postseason numbers are no indication of what we’ll see from him next year. He’ll be fine out there.

  199. Rich in NJ December 23rd, 2009 at 10:58 am

    “how about garrett anderson in LF?”

    He needs to face the Yankees in order to be a MLer.

  200. blake December 23rd, 2009 at 10:58 am

    Stuckey, the key thing you said was “lower levels of the minors”. They have nothing close. I would feel differently if 1)the core of the team were younger or 2)Holliday would cost more. As it stands the Yankees have an ageing core and Holliday is at a discount. You could argue that 2010 will be the Yankees best chance at winning the Ws for quite some time due to the risk involved with ageing players. I’ve said all along that I don’t think the Yankees should sign Holliday at any price, but I do at this price…

  201. mick December 23rd, 2009 at 10:58 am

    marcus markley thame in a platoon with garrett anderson?

  202. vinny-b (NJ and Granderson - thank you Cashman!) December 23rd, 2009 at 10:59 am

    “how about garrett anderson in LF?”
    —————————————-
    he is FA?

    if garrett anderson is not the #1 yankee killer, he is in the top 5

  203. tex's friend December 23rd, 2009 at 10:59 am

    I’m sorry. I dont care about Gardner’s numbers for the short time he played. overall, he has looked overmatched at the plate, has not utilized his strength by bunting for hits, and often stands there as fastballs whizzzz by him. He is a good CF, but so is granderson. I dont think it is smart to move granderson to left, although i am sure he will never complain about it.

    trust me, now that melky is not an option, i hope gardner has an mvp season and i will eat crow, but i am pretty confident i dont have to worry about it.

  204. vinny-b (NJ and Granderson - thank you Cashman!) December 23rd, 2009 at 10:59 am

    marcus markley thame in a platoon with garrett anderson?
    —————————————-
    no

  205. MTU December 23rd, 2009 at 11:00 am

    Mick-

    I have a suggestion for you.

    Why dont we just stop of all of this guessing and just leave LF vacant for the season.

    that way no one would be disappointed and we can just take another look at it next year.

    sound good ?

  206. mick December 23rd, 2009 at 11:02 am

    mtu

    that might work

  207. vinny-b (NJ and Granderson - thank you Cashman!) December 23rd, 2009 at 11:02 am

    MTU: it sound like you throwing in the towel?

  208. mick December 23rd, 2009 at 11:02 am

    randy winn isnt a bad idea

  209. MTU December 23rd, 2009 at 11:02 am

    Mick-

    we could just put Matsui’s wife out there as a placeholder
    until next year.

    The error rate might be a bit high though.

  210. CR9 December 23rd, 2009 at 11:03 am

    Christina25
    December 23rd, 2009 at 8:33 am
    The Phillies GM is not the Diamondbacks or the Braves GM. Did you think that they would give him for peanuts?

    ___

    That is rather funny.

    First, you stole my “peanuts.”

    Second, did you forget the Diamondbacks handing Schill to the Sox for chicken scraps?

    Did you also forget getting handed V Mart for Nick Hagadone (who will never have a career) and Justin Masterson (his career will be quite short)?

  211. Bill Porter December 23rd, 2009 at 11:03 am

    My sense is that Garrett Anderson will definitely become the number 1 Yankees killer if he is signed to play LF for the Yankees.

  212. tex's friend December 23rd, 2009 at 11:03 am

    did i read the cubs were actually considering taking igawa in a deal for Zambrano?

  213. Rich in NJ December 23rd, 2009 at 11:04 am

    “I’m sorry. I dont care about Gardner’s numbers for the short time he played. overall, he has looked overmatched at the plate,”

    But you do, because you wrote him off based on part of April.

    He may end up being awful, but he needs more time to prove or disprove that.

  214. MTU December 23rd, 2009 at 11:04 am

    Vinny-

    Has the last domino fallen yet ?

    You ought to know me better by now.

    (crazy yes, but determined).

  215. Jeremy December 23rd, 2009 at 11:05 am

    blake
    The Yankees will always being in contention. They have a good minor league system, and have already made a number of free agent moves to create a younger core.

    I don’t see the urgency in getting Holliday especially since he is not worth a big time contract. The guy is not a Mark Tex. type player or hitter. We saw how average he was once he left the NL and Colorado. I say no thanks this team is already filled with top talent and I rather go after better guys during next years free agent class.

    And how much is enough ? You do know that the 90′s teams didn’t have all stars throughout their entire lineup.

  216. m December 23rd, 2009 at 11:05 am

    GTNYANND!

    Guess the Next Yankee Acquisition Not Named Damon Contest!

  217. Christina25 December 23rd, 2009 at 11:05 am

    Did you also forget getting handed V Mart for Nick Hagadone (who will never have a career) and Justin Masterson (his career will be quite short)?

    LOL! How do you know that Hagadone will have no career and Masterson will have a short career? Are you a psychic?

  218. mick December 23rd, 2009 at 11:06 am

    considering we keep gardner and get a LF, we still need a 5th OF

  219. timo December 23rd, 2009 at 11:06 am

    2009 OPS+

    Holliday 139
    Damon 126
    Byrd 106
    Melky 99
    DeRosa 99
    Winn 75

    Winn is really bad.

  220. stuckey December 23rd, 2009 at 11:07 am

    Blake, that’s fine and fair, but the part I don’t think you’re considering is that the Yankees internal evaluation of the FA LF options just may be different than yours.

    You appear to be under the assumption are turning away a desirable option because they drew a line in the sand on payroll.

    Now I’m not going or will even try to convince you Holliday isn’t the player you think he is, but that said, you should be able to equally consider the Yankees might not think Holliday is the player YOU think he is.

    You’re no more right or wrong than me, anyone else, or the Yankees, but that said, it is an entirely subjective opinion – that Holliday is worth the cost of admission.

    If the Yankees don’t think so, rather than they really, really like him but are being extreme about payroll, is it really worth going over and over it again and again?

    The Yankees decision to pay or not Holiday $80m+ over 5 years might be being made independent of the outside factors you site.

    “Best available” might not be a convincing enough argument to the Yankees to spend that sort of dough.

  221. m December 23rd, 2009 at 11:07 am

    Argh. Damon on the Brain.

    It’s GTNYANNNJ contest.

    Guess the Next Yankee Acquisition Not Named Nicke Johnson contest.

  222. Rich in NJ December 23rd, 2009 at 11:08 am

    m

    I think Damon relents.

  223. tex's friend December 23rd, 2009 at 11:08 am

    2011: Pay Pujols 40 M/ year and put him in LF. (he started there when he first came up no)?

  224. CB December 23rd, 2009 at 11:08 am

    Phil the Thrill,

    Just to wrap up our prior conversation – on the whole I agree with you on Vizcaino. I was very surprised to see him in the deal and the team definitely had to absorb real pain there.

    I wish they could have bargained wren off of vizcaino even if it meant giving up two other arms.

    That said – the deal was one that was still highly favorable to the yanks and one they should have executed on.

  225. mick December 23rd, 2009 at 11:09 am

    maybe chad curtis can come back and platoon with somebody

  226. CR9 December 23rd, 2009 at 11:09 am

    “LOL! How do you know that Hagadone will have no career and Masterson will have a short career? Are you a psychic?”

    I was alluding to the fact that they are both losers.

    Regardless of whether they have careers or not, they were not “high up” on the Red Sox prospects lists (like the 200 other prospects that are).

    I put “high up” in quotes because just about every minor leaguer to wear a Red Sox minor league uni is touted as the next great stud.

    I cant wait to see Ryan Kalish bagging my groceries in a few years. I wonder if Peter Gammons will tout him as the greatest bagger in Walmart history?

  227. MTU December 23rd, 2009 at 11:09 am

    Rich-

    backwards.

    I think we relent on Damon, and get Holliday.

  228. Chip December 23rd, 2009 at 11:09 am

    Jeter
    Johnson
    Tex
    Alex
    Granderson
    Jorge
    Cano
    Swisher – LF
    Church – RF

  229. m December 23rd, 2009 at 11:10 am

    Rich,

    But do the Yankees reciprocate? I’m thinking, though. That they’d take him back for the $5-6M that’s being thrown around. And we see a lot of defensive replacements to save his legs.

  230. Erin December 23rd, 2009 at 11:10 am

    m
    December 23rd, 2009 at 11:05 am
    GTNYANND!

    Guess the Next Yankee Acquisition Not Named Damon Contest!

    **********************
    Darn, I can’t play. I’m still thinking (hoping??) that it will be Damon ;)

  231. DT - OPPC member December 23rd, 2009 at 11:10 am

    Erica – always OPPC – Bring Johnny Back!!!
    December 23rd, 2009 at 10:48 am
    Johnny Damon??? Johnny Damon??????

    Erica – don’t stop there…sing us the entire song…..

    “Johnny Damon, how I love him.
    He’s got something I can’t resist,
    but he doesn’t even know that I exist.

    Johnny Damon, how I want him.
    How I tingle when he ice skates by.
    Every time he waves “Hello” my heart begins to fly.

    Other fellas call me up for a date,
    but I just sit and wait, I’d rather concentrate …

    … on Johnny Damon. ‘Cause I love him.
    And I pray that someday he’ll love me.
    And together we will see how lovely Yankee Stadium will be.”

  232. vinny-b (NJ and Granderson - thank you Cashman!) December 23rd, 2009 at 11:11 am

    christina25:

    why didn’t your team sign Holliday intead of Cameron. Holliday is a better player, no?

    and don’t say John Henry is saving his money for Mauer. Mauer will not be available. I’m not psycic – just connected

  233. Frank December 23rd, 2009 at 11:11 am

    “How do you know that Hagadone will have no career”

    Hagadone = left handed Brackman

    Which might mean no career. Might mean they recover from injury and turn into pretty good MLB pitchers too.

  234. MTU December 23rd, 2009 at 11:11 am

    Gardener:

    2 things

    didn’t anyone notice the hole in his bat last year ?

    He needs to practice pounding nails into the ground with his bat so he can improve.

  235. Mike RI December 23rd, 2009 at 11:12 am

    I got a feeling we’re getting Jermaine Dye.

  236. m December 23rd, 2009 at 11:12 am

    Damon: Rich, Erin
    Holliday: MTU (stuffing the ballot box with 25 online votes)

  237. tex's friend December 23rd, 2009 at 11:12 am

    cant wait to see Ryan Kalish bagging my groceries in a few years. I wonder if Peter Gammons will tout him as the greatest bagger in Walmart history?

    ____

    Dont forget the Man… the God…. THE Jed Lowrie. The greatest SS prospect in MLB history.

  238. austinmac December 23rd, 2009 at 11:12 am

    I don’t think the Yankees have any real outfield prospects in full season ball yet. It is either Holliday, Crawford, below average players or trade more of the prospects for an quality outfielder for a number of years to come. Even then, one can hardly count on a guy who was just drafted or hit .260 in the Gulf Coast League. I just don’t think the Yankees should have one of the worst offensive left fielders in baseball.

  239. vinny-b (NJ and Granderson - thank you Cashman!) December 23rd, 2009 at 11:13 am

    “I cant wait to see Ryan Kalish bagging my groceries in a few years. I wonder if Peter Gammons will tout him as the greatest bagger in Walmart history?”
    —————————————————

    if he can beat out Craig Hanson

  240. CR9 December 23rd, 2009 at 11:13 am

    When the Yankees wanted Jason Michaels, it was Wang and Cano that were demanded.

    Thankfully for us, of course, as Jason Michaels is not good.

  241. vinny-b (NJ and Granderson - thank you Cashman!) December 23rd, 2009 at 11:14 am

    “I got a feeling we’re getting Jermaine Dye”
    ———————————————–
    would rather roll with what we have then, Mike

  242. tex's friend December 23rd, 2009 at 11:14 am

    if the yankees cant get crawford next year, they will make a trade for a better one then they have. dont worry…

  243. blake December 23rd, 2009 at 11:15 am

    Stuckey, that’s a fair point and if that’s the case then I have no problem with it. I don’t agree but I can’t argue if that’s how they feel.

  244. mick December 23rd, 2009 at 11:15 am

    my son got a hit off hanson in a HS playoff game

  245. Rob L. December 23rd, 2009 at 11:15 am

    Holliday is bum. I just had to get that off my chest.

    Happy Festivus everybody.

  246. Frank December 23rd, 2009 at 11:15 am

    “2011: Pay Pujols 40 M/ year and put him in LF. (he started there when he first came up no)?”

    Thought he started at 3B

  247. MTU December 23rd, 2009 at 11:15 am

    m-
    that aint against the rules is it ?

    sorry about that.

  248. mick December 23rd, 2009 at 11:16 am

    A Festivus for the rest of us!

  249. upstate kate December 23rd, 2009 at 11:17 am

    MTU
    I don’t think the Yankees getting Damon means giving up on the season…and it would keep our GTLU hostess happy :)

    m
    is that a hint you are guessing Damon?

  250. 28 December 23rd, 2009 at 11:17 am

    So, when are they signing Damon?

  251. Christina25 December 23rd, 2009 at 11:17 am

    I was alluding to the fact that they are both losers.

    How did you figure this out? Hagadone didnt even pitch in the major leagues and you call him a loser? Masterson has a trouble getting lefties out but he is very good against righties. Hardly a loser.

  252. tex's friend December 23rd, 2009 at 11:18 am

    so now with javy, what are the chances the yankees hold to their offer to match offers wang gets?

  253. CR9 December 23rd, 2009 at 11:19 am

    Jed Lowrie, ah, the guy Rob Neyer said could be a Gold Glove SS right away, and IIRC, could step in at 3B and be a GG 3rd baseman too.

    Good times at ESPN High.

  254. Erin December 23rd, 2009 at 11:20 am

    Rob L.
    December 23rd, 2009 at 11:15 am

    Happy Festivus everybody.

    *********************
    That’s right, I forgot!!

    Happy Festivus Yankee fans!! :)

  255. m December 23rd, 2009 at 11:20 am

    upstate,

    It could’ve been a Freudian slip (had Freud had a laptop!).

    I don’t know. Me? I’d go with Gardner (for defense), and see what develops. Who knows, maybe midseason someone like DeJesus is made available?

  256. mick December 23rd, 2009 at 11:20 am

    how about a platoon of garrett anderson, randy winn, ty wigginton and chad curtis…pay em a total of 1 mill to split up evenly

  257. vinny-b (NJ and Granderson - thank you Cashman!) December 23rd, 2009 at 11:20 am

    christina25: you didn’t answer my question (RE: holliday)

  258. Patrick December 23rd, 2009 at 11:21 am

    “how about a platoon of garrett anderson, randy winn, ty wigginton and chad curtis…pay em a total of 1 mill to split up evenly”

    Haha

  259. m December 23rd, 2009 at 11:21 am

    Isn’t Winn old? Like really old?

  260. Jeremy December 23rd, 2009 at 11:22 am

    Chip
    I say No to Ryan Church ! Church sucks ! And he is a racist. We don’t need a racist in the Yankee clubhouse. Whats next ? are we going to invite some Klan members ? Say no to Church the racist.

  261. CR9 December 23rd, 2009 at 11:22 am

    “•Mark Feinsand of the New York Daily News says (via Twitter) that the Cubs were willing to take on Kei Igawa’s salary (two years, $8MM) before the Yanks acquired Javier Vazquez. ”

    I do not understand what this means. What is stopping the Cubs from taking him on now?

  262. mick December 23rd, 2009 at 11:22 am

    Could you imagine bringing Wang back as the 5th starter and having Joba and Hughes in the pen?

  263. Chip December 23rd, 2009 at 11:23 am

    I don’t think the Yankees have any real outfield prospects in full season ball yet.

    Austinmac – I think the only true OF prospect the Yankees have in full season ball is Abe Almonte who is still in the South Atlantic League (Low A) he’s compared to a very young Johnny Damon.

    I wouldn’t be shocked if Brandon Laird gets moved to the outfield at some point.

  264. mick December 23rd, 2009 at 11:23 am

    m December 23rd, 2009 at 11:21 am

    Isn’t Winn old? Like really old?

    Baseballreference.com

  265. Frank December 23rd, 2009 at 11:24 am

    “so now with javy, what are the chances the yankees hold to their offer to match offers wang gets?”

    Depends on the offer and whether Wang thinks it’s the best opportunity for him. I think the Yankees getting Vazquez makes it more likely Wang won’t want to come back.

  266. mick December 23rd, 2009 at 11:24 am

    I think Sheffield is a FA.

  267. MTU December 23rd, 2009 at 11:25 am

    Alert !

    I’m changin’ my position on Holliday.

    I have found the PERFECT solution for LF instead.

    I have decided after giving it a great of thought, and trying to think outside the box

    That

    the position will just have to be left VACANT.

    until next year.

    We can revisit the idea again at that time.

    My only real concerns are the effects it might have on the Yankees Offense and Defense.

    And on the void it may leave going forward.

    This is really the BEST solution I can come up with.

    And I think it will work for everyone.

  268. Frank December 23rd, 2009 at 11:25 am

    “I do not understand what this means. What is stopping the Cubs from taking him on now?”

    Talent. The willingness to take Igawa and his contract would have been part of a deal in which the Yankees take Zambrano and his salary.

  269. Christina25 December 23rd, 2009 at 11:26 am

    Vinny,
    What was the question? I miss it.

  270. mick December 23rd, 2009 at 11:26 am

    mtu

    that would solve the “budget” problem.

  271. mick December 23rd, 2009 at 11:27 am

    they could put a lemonade stand out in LF to raise money for the yankees

  272. MTU December 23rd, 2009 at 11:27 am

    mick-
    good point I didn’t even consider that benefit.

  273. Rich in NJ December 23rd, 2009 at 11:29 am

    m

    Unless Cash thinks that Damon’s demeanor would be affected by taking such a big pay cut (a general point he has made in the past), I think so.

    If there is a sticking point beyond that, imo, it will be that Damon wants two years and the Yankees really need him to accept a one year deal.

  274. vinny-b (NJ and Granderson - thank you Cashman!) December 23rd, 2009 at 11:29 am

    christina:

    why didn’t your team sign Holliday intead of Cameron? Holliday is a better player, no?

    don’t say John Henry is saving his money for Mauer. Mauer will not be available. I’m not psycic – just connected

  275. MTU December 23rd, 2009 at 11:29 am

    Mick-
    I had another idea on how to fill the vacancy but I din’t really want to offend anyone. Cause I’m polite.

  276. YankeeRay December 23rd, 2009 at 11:30 am

    Damon is not coming back nor is he the answer. I can’t believe Francessa is pushing for him. His defense is not good and he won’t settle for less of a salary and come back feeling good about it. That ship has sailed.
    We need a RH bat to fill the 5 hole. We can chase around short term options this year and maybe next year as well or we can sign the white elephant in our living room.

    Cmon Hal step up and be a Steinbrenner

  277. MTU December 23rd, 2009 at 11:31 am

    Mick-

    If I only knew I wouldn’t offend Matsui. I would post it.

  278. mick December 23rd, 2009 at 11:32 am

    yankeeray

    right now the obvious #5 hitter is jorge.

  279. MTU December 23rd, 2009 at 11:32 am

    Mick-

    It would make Erica somewhat happy though.

    I call PJO, or MMO.

  280. Rich in NJ December 23rd, 2009 at 11:36 am

    YankeeRay

    Whether or not Damon comes back, what LF that costs approximately $5m is going to be able to be their #5 hitter?

  281. Steve December 23rd, 2009 at 11:38 am

    Kinda of off topic.. But like some of you. I have some Met fans .

    Honestly. don’t you feel kind of bad for them . Nobody wants to play for them ! I have some met fans that are so upset its not funny .

  282. YankeeRay December 23rd, 2009 at 11:40 am

    mick
    December 23rd, 2009 at 11:32 am
    yankeeray

    right now the obvious #5 hitter is jorge.
    ——

    I know that. But will Arod get pitched to with a DP waiting to happen on deck? With Holliday I would bat Tex 4th and at least Tex would get pitched to in the 4 hole vs Arod getting walked for Posada.

  283. YankeeRay December 23rd, 2009 at 11:43 am

    Rich in NJ
    December 23rd, 2009 at 11:36 am
    YankeeRay

    Whether or not Damon comes back, what LF that costs approximately $5m is going to be able to be their #5 hitter?

    There probably isn’t one. Thats why I am saying trade Gaudin to save a little money and step up and sign Holliday and put LF to rest for 4-5 years. Trading Swish next year when his salary escalates makes sense and we will free up 22mm with Pettitte and Javy to sign Lee. Next year we can go cheap in RF and in the 8 hole vs going cheap in LF and the 5 hole this year. Backload his contract and you can make it happen. Make sense?

  284. Christina25 December 23rd, 2009 at 11:45 am

    I think what happened was they made an offer and told Boras that if he doesnt accept it they will move on. Last year they had no idea Tex’s wife didnt want to live in Boston. They actually thought that they will sign him when they flew to Texas. I bet when they got there they knew something is wrong and that is why Henry made his comments about not being players for Tex. After he signed and they found out that Tex always wanted to be a Yankee they were upset with Boras because they felt that he used them to drive up his price.I think they didnt want the same thing to happen again with Holliday. There is no doubt in my mind that they think the Yankees are involved with Holliday. They know that Holliday’s father is a Yankee fan so the odds of them signing Holliday are slim. Why do you think Mauer is not going to be a free agent? I bet he will test free agency and I can tell you that the Red Sox will go hard after him.

  285. Christina25 December 23rd, 2009 at 11:47 am

    Holliday is a better player than Cameron.

  286. Rich in NJ December 23rd, 2009 at 11:47 am

    YankeeRay

    “There probably isn’t one. Thats why I am saying trade Gaudin to save a little money and step up and sign Holliday and put LF to rest for 4-5 years. Trading Swish next year when his salary escalates makes sense and we will free up 22mm with Pettitte and Javy to sign Lee. Next year we can go cheap in RF and in the 8 hole vs going cheap in LF and the 5 hole this year. Backload his contract and you can make it happen. Make sense?”

    I think they would have to trade Swisher now to be able to sign Holliday. He’s coming off a good season, and teams could more easily justify paying him $9m next season by paying him less this season, so his AAV goes down.

  287. murphydog December 23rd, 2009 at 11:49 am

    “Honestly. don’t you feel kind of bad for them . Nobody wants to play for them ! I have some met fans that are so upset its not funny .”

    I know a lot of Met fans, my own daughter is one. (I debated on calling Administration for Children’s Services over that. My poor baby was brainwashed by her mom and stepfather… I kid. Her stepfather is truly about the nicest guy on the planet, even if he is a Met fan).

    The Met fans I know generally fall into two categories:

    1) Suffering from Denial

    2) Yankee-haters

    Either way, their season will be a dismal one.

    The only question is how much dreck I will have to listen to come July when the Mets are fading and the Yankees are surging. IMO Mets fans ought to storm the Bastille and take Omar and the stupid Wilpons out and flog them on Northern Boulevard.

  288. murphydog December 23rd, 2009 at 11:51 am

    “After he signed and they found out that Tex always wanted to be a Yankee they were upset with Boras because they felt that he used them to drive up his price.”

    Oh dream on. Yeah, they were shocked that Boras used the Sox to drive up the price for the Yanks.

  289. YankeeRay December 23rd, 2009 at 11:51 am

    Repost
    Backload the deal and it can work

    86w183
    December 23rd, 2009 at 9:06 am
    Certainly Holliday makes this team better, but is it worth the cost of payroll/roster flexibility in 2011?

    ———-

    What payroll flexibility will be needed? If we don’t win then everyone will want a Crawford signing for about the same amount. We don’t even know if he will be available or want to be a Yankee.
    Holliday wants to be a Yankee from all indications or he would have signed already with the Cardinals.
    This just makes too much sense as did the Tex signing.
    He hits to all fields with power, hits for average and despite his gaffe in the playoffs is a pretty good defender.
    Gardner will get plenty of opportunity to play defense for him and or swish late in games as will Hoffman. Hoffman can spell Grandy from time to time against lefties and Gardner will be running once a game for Posada in a double switch move then replacing an OF for defense. Thats flexibility.
    Holliday needs to be in the 5 hole to protect the 4 hitter who for me in this lineup would be Tex.
    Jeter RH
    Johnson LH
    Arod RH
    Tex SH
    Holliday RH
    Posada SH
    Cano LH
    Swisher SH
    Granderson LH
    Is that a flexible line up that will get us #28?
    Payroll flexibility comes next year when Pettitte and Javy come off the books and we look at trading Swishers escalating salary and signing Lee.

  290. Rich in NJ December 23rd, 2009 at 11:52 am

    “I do not understand what this means. What is stopping the Cubs from taking him on now?”

    Nothing, but without dumping a big salary, they have no interest in Igawa.

  291. Erica - always OPPC - Bring Johnny Back!!! December 23rd, 2009 at 11:53 am

    MTU
    December 23rd, 2009 at 10:57 am
    Kate-

    Is satisfying erica’s obssession with Damon worth costing the rest of us another Championship.

    I guess love conquers all.

    ***********

    I really don’t think a one-year deal with Johnny Damon would cost the Yankees anything. The dude is still productive

  292. trisha - OPPC forever - (new lucky picture from last day at the old Stadium) BRING ON THE GHOSTS! December 23rd, 2009 at 11:53 am

    “But if IPK, Bruney or Coke have post-trade careers like Javier has had?

    Then I’d be pretty excited to get them back.

    Besides all that “accountability” crap is overrated. You want to be accountable? Pitch better! Then you can say whatever you want.

    And no one was less “accountable” than Joba last season and he’s not going anywhere.”

    I am a definite hit and run poster this offseason so I apologize if people respond/question and I don’t respond in return. I saw this one so will respond to it.

    Ted Lilly has a pretty damned good post trade career and I wouldn’t want him back. AGAIN – my premise is that there are pitchers who are not cut out to play in the Bronx. It doesn’t mean they won’t be brilliant elsewhere. I mentioned Vazquez’s attitude because I also think that didn’t help his cause.

    AGAIN AND AGAIN – I am hoping that I am wrong in thinking that Vazquez isn’t cut out for the Bronx. But at least for the time being I think that bringing Vazquez back is a mistake. Time will tell if I am right or wrong.

  293. CB December 23rd, 2009 at 11:54 am

    The team is going to upgrade LF if for no other reason it would be one of the most efficient investments they could make.

    Brett Gardner is a nice player for a particular role. But as a starter he very well could perform at replacement level for a LF. If his defense proves to be a remarkable as some people believe, he could be a game or so better than replacement.

    Overall, Gardner doesn’t profile too much differently than Melky did. Only Gardner has significantly more uncertainty and a higher error surrounding his potential performance.

    Given the market and the number of corner outfielders looking for jobs the yankees should be able to get an upgrade of a couple of wins out in LF for 5-8M.

    They’ve assembled a very good team. But if Gardner or Hoffman can’t handle starting it will be much more expensive to try to upgrade during the season than it will now.

    If nothing else they should just take a flier on Xavier Nady.

  294. Erica - always OPPC - Bring Johnny Back!!! December 23rd, 2009 at 11:55 am

    new thread :arrow:

  295. Bodhisattva - Destiny Wears Pinstripes December 23rd, 2009 at 11:56 am

    tex’s friend
    December 23rd, 2009 at 10:59 am
    I’m sorry. I dont care about Gardner’s numbers for the short time he played. overall, he has looked overmatched at the plate, has not utilized his strength by bunting for hits, and often stands there as fastballs whizzzz by him. He is a good CF, but so is granderson. I dont think it is smart to move granderson to left, although i am sure he will never complain about it.
    trust me, now that melky is not an option, i hope gardner has an mvp season and i will eat crow, but i am pretty confident i dont have to worry about it.
    =====

    Well, look at it this way.

    With Gardner batting ninth, Javy may feel right at home, for we will have a true National League lineup.

  296. Rich in NJ December 23rd, 2009 at 11:56 am

    “AGAIN AND AGAIN – I am hoping that I am wrong in thinking that Vazquez isn’t cut out for the Bronx. But at least for the time being I think that bringing Vazquez back is a mistake. Time will tell if I am right or wrong.”

    If Vazquez isn’t “cut out for the Bronx,” why did he have his best month in April, when stars like Teix, Sheff, Clemens, Tino, CC, etc. struggles as they acclimated themselves to the pressure of playing in NYC?

  297. trisha - OPPC forever - (new lucky picture from last day at the old Stadium) BRING ON THE GHOSTS! December 23rd, 2009 at 12:00 pm

    Perhaps because the pressure got to him as time went on. Contreras also had a pretty good start as I remember…

  298. Christina25 December 23rd, 2009 at 12:01 pm

    Oh dream on. Yeah, they were shocked that Boras used the Sox to drive up the price for the Yanks.

    They did get upset with Boras. So upset that they didnt even want to talk to him about Varitek. He was calling them to talk and they wouldnt respond to him. Varitek then started calling on his own and told Henry that he wanted to come back to the Red Sox. Even after Varitek made contact with Henry they were not involved in the negotiations. Hoyer was the one who talked to Boras and completed the deal.

  299. Rich in NJ December 23rd, 2009 at 12:03 pm

    trisha – OPPC forever – (new lucky picture from last day at the old Stadium) BRING ON THE GHOSTS!

    “Perhaps because the pressure got to him as time went on. Contreras also had a pretty good start as I remember…”

    Even granting your point for the sake of argument, Vazquez had shoulder problems in the 2nd half of the season, so it would be hard to fairly parcel out how much of his declining performance was attributable to pressure.

    Contreras was up and down:

    http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/.....;year=2003

  300. trisha - OPPC forever - (new lucky picture from last day at the old Stadium) BRING ON THE GHOSTS! December 23rd, 2009 at 12:06 pm

    “so it would be hard to fairly parcel out how much of his declining performance was attributable to pressure.”

    Time will tell.

  301. Jeremy December 23rd, 2009 at 12:07 pm

    Steve
    I have some firends who are Mets fans and it is bad in terms of the situation they are in. But I can’t deny that the past couple of years haven’t been funny when it comes to the Mets performances. I swear I was cracking up laughing when they collapsed in 2007, 2008, and 2009 was the best one with all the dropped balls and base running mistakes and horrible pitching. The 2006 NLCS Yadier Molina homerun was funny too.

    The Mets and the Cubs performances are pure comedy.

  302. minnesota yankee fan December 23rd, 2009 at 2:27 pm

    Good Luck Melky!

  303. ko December 23rd, 2009 at 4:09 pm

    The Yankees don’t look like a finished product to me. Vazquez takes the pressure off the starting pitching, but I’d rather go within someone established in the fifth spot. Chamberlain and Hughes have given no indication that they can handle the job of a big league starter. It gets tiring watching the Ponson’s, Rasners, Karstens, Geise’s, Mitre’s, Gaudin’s, Small’s and Chacon’s of the world starting for the Yankees. They’ve got the means to do better. Get Bedard or Sheets. The outfield is a mess. No left fielder, Swisher can’t hit a breaking pitch to save his life and Granderson is useless against lefties. Need to beef up there. I’d start with DeRosa. After that someone young and fast who hits a lot better than Gardner.

Leave a comment below

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Forgotten Password
Cancel

Sponsored by:
 

Search

    Advertisement

    Follow

    Mobile

    Read The LoHud Yankees Blog on the go by navigating to the blog on your smartphone or mobile device's browser. No apps or downloads are required.

    LoHud TV

    More Videos

Advertisement

Place an ad

Call (914) 694-3581