The LoHud Yankees Blog

A New York Yankees blog by Chad Jennings and the staff of The Journal News


Waiting for another grounder to second

Posted by: Chad Jennings - Posted in Misc on Feb 12, 2010 Print This Post Print This Post | Email This Post Email This Post

When Sam and I were putting together the Pinch Hitters series, there were a few proposals that stood out as obvious parts of the series. There were a few tough decisions and a few difficult omissions, but Pete’s post was always the one we wanted to use as the finale.

On Thursday, Frank wrote about the way a World Series can suddenly take a unthinkable turn for the worst. This morning, Pete wrote about the way a routine grounder to second can become a monumental moment. I don’t think I’ll ever forget talking to Mark Teixeira after the 2009 clincher — No. 27 on Pete’s list – and having him ask whether anyone could remember who he hugged first during the infield celebration. He honestly couldn’t remember. After that groundball, his world became a blur.

“I didn’t feel it,” Teixeira said of the throw to first. “I literally did not feel it hit my glove. I had to look down afterward to make sure that I caught it.”

Pitchers and catchers report to the Yankees spring training complex on Wednesday. In five days, the Yankees will turn the page and begin actively chasing No. 28.

Hope Pete left room in that notebook.

 
 

Advertisement

276 Responses to “Waiting for another grounder to second”

  1. Jerkface February 12th, 2010 at 12:14 pm

    Threaded comments don’t work on blogs for the following reasons:

    - With messageboards, ‘threads’ are bumped to the top of the page when they are replied to, and many messageboards have buttons which take you directly to new posts and / or color old posts so you don’t waste time slogging through stuff you have read

    - Blog ‘threads’ are static entities on a page and do not move, which means conversations could be happening at the top AND bottom of a blog comment dump simultaneously

    - For posts which are top to bottom , chronological makes the most sense, because the order and location of the comment matter. Threading posts just jumbles things up unnecessarily.

    This is not a messageboard, unless you want to make it act like one I say get rid of threaded comments, they are obnoxious in anything other than a forum.

    Go back to chronological and have the reply button automatically paste the comment you are replying to into your comment box.

  2. blake February 12th, 2010 at 12:16 pm

    I concur with Jerkface.

  3. CountryClub February 12th, 2010 at 12:18 pm

    I still disagree. haha

  4. Doreen - Ain't it Just "Grand"? February 12th, 2010 at 12:18 pm

    Well, we can ignore the function and just keep replying at the bottom, as we always have.

  5. Wave Your Hat February 12th, 2010 at 12:20 pm

    Yes but you could miss other comments you would have wanted to see, right? Not to miss a comment, you have to scroll through all the comments every time you click, correct?

  6. blake February 12th, 2010 at 12:21 pm

    If there was some way that when someone replys to someone else that that could go to the bottom instead of staying in the middle of the page or wherever then it might be better.

  7. Erica - always OPPC - UNDO! February 12th, 2010 at 12:21 pm

    Well said Jerkface

    I repeat- This is INEFFICIENT!

  8. Chad Jennings February 12th, 2010 at 12:21 pm

    Hi everyone. Obviously we’re trying some new things here. We’re going to give it a shot and see how it works, but we’re more than happy to hear feedback. Shoot an email to Jeff, our tech guy, at: jmarx@lohud.com. Let him know what you like and what you don’t, what’s working and what isn’t.

  9. CountryClub February 12th, 2010 at 12:21 pm

    It boggles my mind why people would be against having all the comments in a specific conversation in one concentrated spot. But it appears I’m in the minority (at least so far). Oh well…

  10. Erin February 12th, 2010 at 12:22 pm

    I agree with Jerface-not a fan of the new format.

  11. GreenBeret7 February 12th, 2010 at 12:22 pm

    If you missed this week’s Yankee magazine on YES, they have a nice little interview with Jesus Montero, who’s been in Florida working out since January

  12. Phil the Thrill February 12th, 2010 at 12:22 pm

    Not digging the new format.

  13. Camilo Gerardo February 12th, 2010 at 12:23 pm

    What is vegas giving us to repeat thus far? don’t know the link.

  14. Erin February 12th, 2010 at 12:23 pm

    Edit- **Jerkface**

  15. CountryClub February 12th, 2010 at 12:24 pm

    Chad,

    People always rebel against new things. Erica said there should be a poll to see who likes/dislike the reply button. I think that makes sense. But I think you should have the poll after a few weeks so people can get a chance to use it and really see if they like it or not.

    I won’t beat a dead horse and keep trying to change people’s opinions. I just think they need to get used to it.

  16. GreenBeret7 February 12th, 2010 at 12:25 pm

    Lincecum signs for 2 years at $23 mil.

  17. CountryClub February 12th, 2010 at 12:26 pm

    If you like or hate it is up to you. But inefficient is the last thing it is.

  18. Rick February 12th, 2010 at 12:26 pm

    The mystery of spring training is that nobody on the team knows who will cause or create the final pitch for the final out of the World Series or who will have the game winning RBI.

  19. SJ44 February 12th, 2010 at 12:26 pm

    Joba needs as much work on his secondary pitches (some would argue more given his walk totals last year) as Phil. Just because he started last year, that doesn’t give him a leg up on that front.

    He has a leg up on innings. That’s it. Truth be told, Phil had a better season than Joba did last year. That also plays into the decision.

    In case some forget, Joba was the worst starting pitcher in the AL for the last 5 weeks of the season.

    His curveball, slider (throwing it for strikes rather than continuing to miss away) and change up, as well as fastball command, all need work.

    Betsy,

    There is an old baseball axiom which states, “Never reach a conclusion on a player in September or Spring Training”. You often get false reads.

    The Yankees aren’t going to choose their fifth starter based on who has the best stats at the end of the spring.

    We have this discussion every year on the board with people who use ST stats as an argument for why guys should play.

    That’s not how teams evaluate guys.

    If Derek Jeter goes 0-40 in the spring and Ramiro Pena goes 35-40, guess who the starting SS is on Opening Day?

    If CC Sabathia is 0-4 with a 10 ERA and Chad Gaudin is 4-0 with a 0.00 ERA, guess who is the Opening Day starter?

    The Yankees will choose the fifth starter based on whomever they feel will give them the best chance to win.

    That will come from watching how free and easy guys throw…..how their secondary stuff is translating…..and fastball command.

    The stats won’t play a role in it.

  20. Coach6423 February 12th, 2010 at 12:26 pm

    no, i like it as well. In typical Yankee fan fashion, some need to complain about everything….

  21. Jerkface February 12th, 2010 at 12:27 pm

    You can disagree, but there is no logical way to determine where new postings are other than to check the entire comment area.

    This is completely inefficient and people who claim that threaded blog comments are better or somehow easier to read are merely lying to themselves and ignoring the extra work that goes into locating new posts.

  22. CountryClub February 12th, 2010 at 12:28 pm

    Good for him. He gets some financial stability for the rest of his life and after two years he can try for the mother load.

  23. SJ44 February 12th, 2010 at 12:28 pm

    I know its getting close to the start of the season because my nephew left today for Bradenton and his first big league ST.

    To say he is psyched up about it is an understatement.

    Hope he has a shot at playing in the ST opener against the Yankees on March 3.

  24. tampayank February 12th, 2010 at 12:29 pm

    anyone see the Swisher piece on the recent Yankee Magazine? ha love that guy

  25. tampayank February 12th, 2010 at 12:30 pm

    part of the Pirates organization?

  26. Erin February 12th, 2010 at 12:31 pm

    How exciting!!! Are you just as excited as he is? :)

  27. Jerkface February 12th, 2010 at 12:31 pm

    Concentrating posts is overrated on a blog because there is no way to alert a user that new posts are available. Additionally, there are no subjects, so to discern the ‘topic’ of each thread you have to read it, which means reading stuff you don’t care about.

    Basically, this is like a half-rate messageboard.

    I want a full rate blog comment section, not a half rate messageboard. And trust me when I say I am not ‘railing against something new’. I have been on the internet since its popular inception with prodigy, aol 1.0, and various BBS and dial up services. This is completely inefficient in terms of reading and replying.

  28. Bronx Jeers February 12th, 2010 at 12:33 pm

    NEVER use the reply link when responding to trolls.

    It will only incite them more.

    If you want to call them out, please write a separate comment.

    There may be a pop quiz on this later in the day. :wink:

  29. Erin February 12th, 2010 at 12:33 pm

    OK, I’m leaving work in a few minutes-when I check in later this afternoon, will the blog be back to normal???

  30. Jerkface February 12th, 2010 at 12:33 pm

    It is efficient for the CONVERSATION to be in 1 place.

    It is INEFFICIENT for the READER to find all the new posts in multiple conversations.

    The internet should always be about efficiency for the user. Only when the conversation suffers should other means be tried, and I think its safe to say that the Yankees most popular blog has not lacked for conversation.

  31. muffin stump February 12th, 2010 at 12:33 pm

    oohh, what happened to the blog?!

    (go away to work for a couple of weeks in the off season, and the reply buttons have multiplied in a dizzying new format. grumble, grumble.)

  32. Betsy -Romine wasn't built in a day February 12th, 2010 at 12:35 pm

    If most people don’t use the reply function, we should be ok.

    SJ, and I completely agree about using ST that way. It’s why I never thought this “competition” was a good idea. If the Yankees are going to treat it like you think, then it’s fine.

    I didn’t think Joba pitched well last year, especially in the second half. I do think most fans still drool over his velocity and think that if it returns, he will be dominant. I still don’t like his stubborness and the velocity thing bothers me. There are plenty of pitchers who throw hard who can’t hit the side of a barn. By the same token, there are fans and others who think Phil won’t succeed as a starter because his velocity will drop upon his return to the rotation. That’s silly. He was healthy last year and his velocity returned to 92-94 as a starter. He’s got great late life and, when he’s on, amazing command. I enjoyed watching him paint the corner – it was fun to watch. As a fan of Phil personally, I just want to see him fulfill his potential. As a fan of the team, I want both Joba and Phil to do well.

  33. Erica - always OPPC - UNDO! February 12th, 2010 at 12:36 pm

    Hi muffin stump!!!!

  34. Erica - always OPPC - UNDO! February 12th, 2010 at 12:36 pm

    Feedback has been sent!

  35. Wave Your Hat February 12th, 2010 at 12:37 pm

    This format is cumbersome but feasible when the comment volume is low.

    But once the season starts and you start getting three or four hundred or more comments to a blog post, it’s going to be nearly impossible to find all the new messages and read them.

  36. Erica - always OPPC - UNDO! February 12th, 2010 at 12:37 pm

    Lets all join hands and yell “INEFFICIENT” together!!!

  37. CountryClub February 12th, 2010 at 12:38 pm

    I generally agree with your post. But I think Joba is the starter unless he gets hurt. I agree with others when they say that the Yanks didnt build him up for the past two years (and take the criticism) just to throw him back in the pen. They will give him every opportunity to stick in the rotation this year.

  38. CountryClub February 12th, 2010 at 12:38 pm

    I second this

  39. muffin stump February 12th, 2010 at 12:39 pm

    hi erica. have you divested yourself of the guess the lineup for the 2010? what will you do all day at work after tax season is over?!

  40. SJ44 February 12th, 2010 at 12:39 pm

    Yes I am. Really for him because all the hard work he has put in is paying off.

    This is going to be a good experience for him. He will get a chance to mix in with major leaguers and get more insight on what its going to take to make it to the majors.

    He is going to start the year in High A ball with the new Bradenton team in the Florida State League. Big ballparks, mostly a pitcher friendly league.

    Its going to be interesting to see how he adapts to that as opposed to the SAL (South Atlantic League) which is mostly a hitters league.

  41. CountryClub February 12th, 2010 at 12:40 pm

    Most people wont be replying to people during game posts. they’ll have their own comments to make. Conversations are rare during games.

  42. muffin stump February 12th, 2010 at 12:40 pm

    ooohh, will this do ever shrinking boxes of replies?

  43. upstate kate February 12th, 2010 at 12:40 pm

    wow, what happened to the blog?
    Do you have to keep scrolling up to look for responses, or do new responses automatically go to the bottom?

  44. Bronx Jeers February 12th, 2010 at 12:41 pm

    That’s just awesome. You must be so proud.

    I see the Yanks have 4 games against them.

    I hope we get a chance to see him play on YES.

  45. CountryClub February 12th, 2010 at 12:41 pm

    haha. yeah, I’m lying to myself about a freaking blog. At the end of the day, I’ll accept whatever format the blog goes with. But the threaded version is much better.

  46. Holden February 12th, 2010 at 12:41 pm

    I can’t find it. Any help, please. Txs.

  47. Erica - always OPPC - UNDO! February 12th, 2010 at 12:42 pm

    Unfortunately, after busy season the work is still there. The hours just go down and the tax retruns disappear. But the CPA’s job is never finished!

    Doreen is officially taking over GTLU duties and I know she will be awesome at it.

    I will miss it a little. But I knew it was tiem for a change when I started planning meetings so they wouldn’t interfere with GTLU

  48. CountryClub February 12th, 2010 at 12:42 pm

    No

  49. Jeff Marx February 12th, 2010 at 12:42 pm

    Hey Guys, we hear you loud and clear. Just try and give it a chance for a couple days. This is a bit of a trial period. Email me your thoughts at jmarx@lohud.com.

  50. randy l. February 12th, 2010 at 12:42 pm

    i say give the new format a chance.

    use the “reply” where it makes sense.

    like me busting gb7 for breaking nurse karloff’s heart and now moving on to greener pastures.

    in other words use the “reply ” function when you are talking more to that specific person than to the whole blog.

    the blog may even appreciate it :)

  51. champ809 February 12th, 2010 at 12:45 pm

    the lst 5 weeks Joba made a series of 2 and 3 inning starts….prior to the abbreviated start portion o his season joba was top 10 era in the Al and only CC had a better era on the Yanks.
    Joba has also certainly been a much much better starter than Phil so far in their early careers and right now has a much more advanced arsenal of pitches to attack hitters with right now.
    The fact is Joba should right now be the 5th starter based on performance and merit and Phil, while he still has a bright future as a starter in my opinion, is behind Joba in both development and ceiling.

  52. CountryClub February 12th, 2010 at 12:45 pm

    Wow, I give up. I guess I just differ with most of you. i think the worst part of this blog in the past is that you had to always scroll to the bottom to find a response. But it appears most of you like that. I guess I’ll shut up if that’s the case.

  53. Doreen - Ain't it Just "Grand"? February 12th, 2010 at 12:46 pm

    If everyone agreed to do it as we always have, then there would be no problem. I think. :)

    Well, anyway, it looks kind neat.

  54. Jerkface February 12th, 2010 at 12:46 pm

    What would be nice, is if comments are sorted chronologically, by date of last post. So new posts would move an entire thread to the bottom. That’d be a good solution.

  55. GreenBeret7 February 12th, 2010 at 12:46 pm

    Like most, Jack Moore of FanGraphs finds it hard to imagine 2011 free agent Derek Jeter finishing his career with a team other than the Yankees. One reason Moore believes Jeter’s a fit in the Bronx: the shortstop’s inside-out swing is perfect for Yankee Stadium.

    ————————————————————

    Only one reason, Jack?

  56. Jerkface February 12th, 2010 at 12:48 pm

    How often do you read the blog? If you refresh, it automatically takes you to the last post you were looking at (the ‘scroll point’ for the page) which meant merely scrolling down to read new posts.

    Your preferred method involves scrolling down AND up.

    Are you selfish and only care about your particular conversation? Thus you only sit at your own thread and click refresh constantly?

  57. Shame Spencer February 12th, 2010 at 12:48 pm

    Ideally, a blog like this would have a forum. It operates more like a message board and allows people to post and reply in threads. I dont know if that is a real solution for this blog though. I’m not sure how open a lot of posters would be to that since most people here have gotten used to the ‘free flowing’ conversation style.

  58. Doreen - Ain't it Just "Grand"? February 12th, 2010 at 12:49 pm

    You know we’ll all be pulling for him, SJ!

  59. trisha - OPPC forever - (new lucky picture from last day at the old Stadium) BRING ON THE GHOSTS! February 12th, 2010 at 12:49 pm

    I hate it!

    Oh, you said email you.

    ;)

  60. Jerkface February 12th, 2010 at 12:50 pm

    There is an undeniable inefficiency to the whole thing. You are trying to deny it.

    - Lack of updated postins moving to a more visible location
    - No subject lines to denote thread contents
    - No information as to new postings

    =

    Scrolling the entire comment field looking for updates, and only knowing that a comment is new by remembering previous comments

  61. Betsy -Romine wasn't built in a day February 12th, 2010 at 12:51 pm

    So people that don’t like the new format are spoiled complainers? It’s ridiculous, I’m sorry; Jerkface has said it better than I ever could.

  62. trisha - OPPC forever - (new lucky picture from last day at the old Stadium) BRING ON THE GHOSTS! February 12th, 2010 at 12:51 pm

    Never have I gone through 59 posts in such short order. That’s because I skipped over most of them.

    Do NOT like this format.

    Will email jeff.

    Looked at the TOS and my lohud Yankee fan card and neither said I had to like the new format.

    THANK GOD!

  63. muffin stump February 12th, 2010 at 12:51 pm

    great motto: “the cpa’s job is never finished!” i can see it as a tag line when you set up your own shop.

    so, the boxes don’t actually shrink, they just expand. hmmm….

    glad you talked doreen into it. she was the voice of sanity on the blog for a couple of years there. kind of a blog mother. but doreen seemed not to post as much last season or so. maybe gtlu duties will bring her back.

  64. Doreen - Ain't it Just "Grand"? February 12th, 2010 at 12:51 pm

    muffin stump -

    Erica has said to me that she will fill in when I am unable to perform GTLU duties. :)

    I’m looking forward to bringing GTLU to you all, and hoping to have a little spring training of my own maybe the last week to 10 days of spring training games.

  65. GreenBeret7 February 12th, 2010 at 12:52 pm

    Don’t be bashful, Randy. Borissa says that you was a perfect gentleman last night….and a real “stud muffin”. I hope she didn’t notice when I threw up on her shoes with that news.

  66. trisha - OPPC forever - (new lucky picture from last day at the old Stadium) BRING ON THE GHOSTS! February 12th, 2010 at 12:52 pm

    As my dad always used to tell us, if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it!

  67. Rob NY -- 2009 The Road to Redemption February 12th, 2010 at 12:52 pm

    I have a suggestion for the IT department. Can we use the email addresses we put in everytime we post to get notifications if one of the replies we made gets commented on or one of the comments we are involved with gets replied to? That way a lot of the “We need to keep scrolling up and down” problems get alleviated. Just my two cents.

  68. Jerkface February 12th, 2010 at 12:53 pm

    It is just an undeniable fact that threaded static comments require more work overall to read and respond to, and only dedicated conversationalists will take part in the discussion.

    Or parties arriving late to the discussion who will post something that no one will read.

  69. Doreen - Ain't it Just "Grand"? February 12th, 2010 at 12:53 pm

    This format would probably make GTLU easier for me. All the lineups would be in one string.

  70. upstate kate February 12th, 2010 at 12:53 pm

    that would be a perfect solution. Then you wouldn’t have to scroll up and down to make sure you haven’t missed anything.

  71. Rich in NJ February 12th, 2010 at 12:54 pm

    A lot of people don’t understand, or want to acknowledge, how much of a role luck plays in the postseason.

  72. CountryClub February 12th, 2010 at 12:54 pm

    I’m on here every day. Selfish? No. But there are a lot of people on here that post drivel. And I’d love to be able to bypass their conversations. It’s much easier to do that in threaded commenting. Also, it’s much easier to follow a conversation that I’m interested in (even if I’m not a part of it).

    We disagree, not the end of the world

  73. Rob NY -- 2009 The Road to Redemption February 12th, 2010 at 12:55 pm

    As do I.

    Threaded commenting is the best way to go. The only reason you would have to keep checking the whole post is if you’re involved in a specific conversation, or if you are interested in it. If so, you know where it is.

    The old format lost a lot of good posts because it was more of a steamroller approach to conversation.

  74. CountryClub February 12th, 2010 at 12:55 pm

    I havent seen one person call you or anyone else a spoiled complainer.

  75. trisha - OPPC forever - (new lucky picture from last day at the old Stadium) BRING ON THE GHOSTS! February 12th, 2010 at 12:55 pm

    Doreen – you would hope! Someone coming late to the dance might do an individual post.

    This definitely could discourage me from both reading and posting here. That might be a good reason for a variety of people to vote for it, Randy…

  76. Jerkface February 12th, 2010 at 12:56 pm

    Yea so now I have to check my email to see if someone talked to me on a blog? Forget this. I do not want my inbox spammed up with emails that RobbieCano69 just responded to me on Lohud.

  77. champ809 February 12th, 2010 at 12:56 pm

    the velocity “issue” that you guys constantly refer to was more about using the two seamer as opposedto the four seamer. Girardi and Eiland implored Joba to feature his newly developed two seam fastball and pitch to contact as they had him on both a pitch count limit and an innings limit. Joba as a reliever had always featured his four seamer and slider as a strikeout pitcher usually would. When he went back to the pen in the postseason he went back to that mentality and back to the four seamer hence the higher velo.
    The Yanks should let Joba pitch the way he’s always pitched and refine that as opposed to trying to remake him into something that he’s not.
    Imagine the Tigers ordering Verlander to throw fewer four seamers and feature a sinker as his #1 pitch. He wouldn’t be the same pitcher.
    This by the way came straight from the horse’s mouth. Joba said exactly this when he came back from the break and had that 3-4 start run when he looked like the best young gun in the game,when asked what the difference was he said he went back to throwing his four seamer and being aggressive as opposed to the two seamer and trying to paint the corners.

  78. Doreen - Ain't it Just "Grand"? February 12th, 2010 at 12:58 pm

    I tend to post less if I have nothing new to say. :) But I’m always reading…

  79. champ809 February 12th, 2010 at 12:58 pm

    SJ 44

    champ809 says:
    February 12th, 2010 at 12:45 pm
    the lst 5 weeks Joba made a series of 2 and 3 inning starts….prior to the abbreviated start portion o his season joba was top 10 era in the Al and only CC had a better era on the Yanks.
    Joba has also certainly been a much much better starter than Phil so far in their early careers and right now has a much more advanced arsenal of pitches to attack hitters with right now.
    The fact is Joba should right now be the 5th starter based on performance and merit and Phil, while he still has a bright future as a starter in my opinion, is behind Joba in both development and ceiling.

  80. Rob NY -- 2009 The Road to Redemption February 12th, 2010 at 12:58 pm

    Efficiency is lost whenever there is more than one conversation on the old format. It is wildly inefficient when 50 people are all talking about different topics in the same area. Threaded commenting corrals those conversation into one easy to find blue field. It’s more than just efficient it’s the MOST efficient way to run it. I am for e-mail notifications, which would stop anyone who doesn’t remember what conversations they’re involved in.

  81. muffin stump February 12th, 2010 at 12:59 pm

    hi doreen! glad you will be around and that you and erica will have the chance to work together. spring training gtlu sounds like a great idea. my only claim to fame is never having won gtlu. (i usually miss the deadline.) hope to keep my record going this year.

  82. Jerkface February 12th, 2010 at 12:59 pm

    Not saying it will happen, but what will you do if he busts?

    I hope you are around for his success or failure, it’d be interesting to have a near first hand account of it.

  83. Doreen - Ain't it Just "Grand"? February 12th, 2010 at 1:01 pm

    In which case, it would instead be a nightmare! Oy.

  84. Rob NY -- 2009 The Road to Redemption February 12th, 2010 at 1:01 pm

    love the new format and am baffled by the criticisms. Mostly because they don’t seem to be logical to me.

  85. Rich in NJ February 12th, 2010 at 1:02 pm

    Can we trade the reply function for an edit function?

  86. Betsy -Romine wasn't built in a day February 12th, 2010 at 1:02 pm

    LOL give it a chance? Why does every change necessarily have to be a good one? This one stinks.

  87. Bronx Jeers February 12th, 2010 at 1:02 pm

    If I can get used to seeing Don Mattingly wear Dodger Blue I guess I can get used to this.

  88. Doreen - Ain't it Just "Grand"? February 12th, 2010 at 1:03 pm

    So, you mean the latest reply would be the sort criteria? Can they do that? :)

  89. Betsy -Romine wasn't built in a day February 12th, 2010 at 1:03 pm

    CC, not me, but someone said that people that don’t like change are whining or complaining or something like that. That’s not true, not IMO.

  90. muffin stump February 12th, 2010 at 1:04 pm

    hey, having nothing to say doesn’t seem to deter anyone else. besides, how else are we going to test this new reply system? how many boxes within the boxes can it do before it crashes the server?

  91. Jerkface February 12th, 2010 at 1:04 pm

    Your assumption is that people are only interested in one conversation or that everyone would suddenly start grouping their conversations accordingly.

    Your ideal

    Blog topic – Damon signs with the Losers
    Thread 1 – Damon signs with the losers what a moron!
    Thread 2 – Off topic about Erica’s pantyhose
    Thread 3 – SJ44/Randy rambling about something
    Thread 4 – Joba/Hughes the revenge

    THe reality is that there are going to be multiple threads all relating to the same thing, and the comments only nest 3 deep anyways so at some point you lose the ‘reply’ function.

    And it still means having to look at all postings to find new ones.

    I think some people are obviously interested in EVERYTHING posted on the blog. I will ignore drivel and scroll by it, but I still want to see what was posted as I might want to respond to it.

  92. Hoffa February 12th, 2010 at 1:04 pm

    Threaded comments do not work on this blog because we have real time conversations. Blogs that receive periodic comments are appropriate for threaded comments, but it destroys the flow here.

  93. Hoffa February 12th, 2010 at 1:06 pm

    Rich in NJ says: February 12th, 2010 at 1:02 pm

    Can we trade the reply function for an edit function?
    __________

    Well said!!

  94. Jerkface February 12th, 2010 at 1:07 pm

    Threaded comments might work fine on River Ave Blues, but that blog is more about analysis anyways, and doesn’t receive the same traffic.

    (And surprise, it is also obnoxious to read and follow!)

  95. TD February 12th, 2010 at 1:07 pm

    Boo.

    Do not like this new format.

  96. JT February 12th, 2010 at 1:07 pm

    Especially if you were at the stadium, Girardi’s triple in 1996 was an incredible moment!

  97. Doreen - Ain't it Just "Grand"? February 12th, 2010 at 1:08 pm

    This blog is very stream-of-consciousness at times. Topics all over the place, at least when there aren’t games or a very compelling main topic. Sam & Chad’s topic posts generally rule for a while, but then we tend to go off on tangents or strike up entirely new themes within the post.

    All that to say, I don’t know how you really break the body of these into “threads.” Which is why it really was not a problem the way it was.

    So far, the new format makes it a little more work, and since most of you all are browsing this from an actual job, that’s probably not a good thing.

  98. Jerkface February 12th, 2010 at 1:10 pm

    So now I have replies to the top, middle, and bottom of this thread. I will now scroll the entire thing to see if anyone replied.

  99. jennifer February 12th, 2010 at 1:11 pm

    Nope, but now I know to DVR it thanks.

  100. JT February 12th, 2010 at 1:11 pm

    Wow, I think we need a new post specifically for people to complain about the format of the blog. Can we comment about the post? Come on.

  101. Rob NY -- 2009 The Road to Redemption February 12th, 2010 at 1:11 pm

    How arduous of a task is it when you check your email? Usually a little info box pops up on my screen and gives me the subject and first few lines of the message. Then I could say “Oh now someone has responded to my comment.” As opposed to walking away from the computer for 15 minutes during a game thread and having to sort through 200 posts to discern if anyone has responded to the issue I was talking about.

  102. Jerkface February 12th, 2010 at 1:12 pm

    I have now quadrupled the amount of time it takes for me to see that no one has responded to anything I said.

    :(

  103. Jerkface February 12th, 2010 at 1:13 pm

    Mark Teixeira had no feeling in his glove, but I feel very strongly about this blog!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  104. Doreen - Ain't it Just "Grand"? February 12th, 2010 at 1:13 pm

    Ha! I’m still not used to Mattingly in Dodger Blue – or, perhaps better to say, I’m used to it, but I still don’t like it! :)

  105. jennifer February 12th, 2010 at 1:13 pm

    Hit cntrl F and type your name in and you can go through the thread that way.

  106. Bronx Jeers February 12th, 2010 at 1:14 pm

    It doesn’t appear to be working for the mobile version as all the “replies” just show up in chronological order.

    And this does not work because most of the replies don’t make sense unless you know the context of the original post.

  107. SJ44 February 12th, 2010 at 1:14 pm

    If he busts, he has a Boston College degree and over a million bucks in the bank. Good way to get started on a life after baseball.

    Whether he makes it or not, he will do just fine. He’s a solid kid and thankfully has his head on straight.

  108. Rob NY -- 2009 The Road to Redemption February 12th, 2010 at 1:16 pm

    That would absolutely be my ideal, that people realize they can respond in one area and have a conversation on a particular topic in a particular area. That way I can see the topic of the first post when (as inevitably happens) I come late and want to catch up. If I don’t like the first post I can avoid the rest. If I like the first post I can do like I always do and keep someone’s name from it in my ctl F box. I usually search for specific posters and sort it that way anyhow.

    As an aside I wonder what the breakdown of this by age would be. Not trying to call anyone old or anything but I was 9 or 10 when aol 2.0 came out.

  109. Doreen - Ain't it Just "Grand"? February 12th, 2010 at 1:17 pm

    I just wanted to see what happens if I reply to this one, because it’s the most dense.
    :)

  110. G. Love February 12th, 2010 at 1:18 pm

    It’s the kid’s first spring training. Let’s quiet the talk of busts and asking his uncle to speculate on that which is out of line.

    SJ has always been candid and up front with all of us in this blog from jump street. Asking him to speculate on the negative possibility of probably the most exciting thing in his family right now is rude.

  111. G. Love February 12th, 2010 at 1:19 pm

    I love it Jeff. It makes the debates about someone’s posts much easier to follow.

  112. Jerkface February 12th, 2010 at 1:19 pm

    I don’t crap up my email with unnecessary crap, and I often check the blog from work where I will not check my home email and my home email is Windows Live Mail which is an email client and I do not receive notifications.

    Its an obnoxious step to keep track of a blog.

  113. Doreen - Ain't it Just "Grand"? February 12th, 2010 at 1:21 pm

    Rob,

    I am going to be 52 next month. I am the one who talked my husband into going online with Prodigy and even did some online shopping on Speigel catalog (early 90s I guess). So I’m not averse to change at all.

    I think what the deal is here is the entire nature of the conversations that happen here, as well as the volume of posts. If you’re following several “threads” then you’re going to be constantly scrolling up and down to see if there’ve been responses.

    It’s going to take a lot more concentration and a lot more work, and I’m guessing it’s extra time a lot of people don’t have. I think it will end up discouraging conversations and inhibiting people from posting at all.

  114. G. Love February 12th, 2010 at 1:21 pm

    I really like the idea of us getting notified when you’re replied to.

    If you don’t like it, you could just label the thread reply updates to spam and never see them.

  115. IDCWYT February 12th, 2010 at 1:21 pm

    It also says “says” after everyone’s name.

  116. Jerkface February 12th, 2010 at 1:22 pm

    You seriously ctrl-F to find posters? This is just adding so much extra work to a blog comment space. I dont want to specific search for posters. I want the least amount of work possible.

    On messageboards I won’t read ‘off-topic’ type threads, but I have missed really good conversations/posts that way. The stream of consciousness posting on lohud allowed me to see everything.

    And I continue to be selective on normal messageboards.

  117. Doreen - Ain't it Just "Grand"? February 12th, 2010 at 1:23 pm

    I replied to a a reply of a reply to one of your posts above. :)

  118. Doreen - Ain't it Just "Grand"? February 12th, 2010 at 1:24 pm

    Ha! Thanks for pointing that out. I didn’t notice that. :)

  119. IDCWYT February 12th, 2010 at 1:25 pm

    maybe is should say wrote

  120. vb03 February 12th, 2010 at 1:26 pm

    I know this is an experimental thing, but this kind of format should be saved for actual forums, message boards usually don’t have a dedicated reply button per post, simply because scrolling down through all the quotes quickly becomes a pain.

    If there’s gonna be a Reply button, might as well have a regular forum with threads and usernames.

  121. Melkman is in Hotlanta February 12th, 2010 at 1:26 pm

    Jerky, totally agree that this format stinks.

  122. Betsy -Romine wasn't built in a day February 12th, 2010 at 1:27 pm

    This is dumb, I’m sorry. It’s VERY time consuming whether you are checking the blog out from work or not. You have to go back and check posts you already read in case you miss a comment. The other way was working fine – I don’t get why we have to give it a shot and why it was even necessary to change.

  123. Doreen - Ain't it Just "Grand"? February 12th, 2010 at 1:27 pm

    What’s also tedious is figuring out which “nest” you really want to reply to, especially once it gets crowded. Do you know what I mean?

  124. Betsy -Romine wasn't built in a day February 12th, 2010 at 1:28 pm

    I do not want to get notified when I am responded to. Sorry, the idea of having to go to my spam (or regular e-mail) and delete a ton of messages is just not appealing.

  125. Frank from Chatham NJ February 12th, 2010 at 1:28 pm

    I never thought age would have an effect on a comment.

  126. Erica - always OPPC - UNDO! February 12th, 2010 at 1:29 pm

    Jerkface says:
    February 12th, 2010 at 1:04 pm
    Your assumption is that people are only interested in one conversation or that everyone would suddenly start grouping their conversations accordingly.

    Your ideal

    Blog topic – Damon signs with the Losers
    Thread 1 – Damon signs with the losers what a moron!
    Thread 2 – Off topic about Erica’s pantyhose
    Thread 3 – SJ44/Randy rambling about something
    Thread 4 – Joba/Hughes the revenge

    *****************

    Excuse me! I don’t wear pantyhose!!!!

  127. Carl February 12th, 2010 at 1:29 pm

    Loving the new look. I just wish the reply button was a little bit smaller.

  128. JT February 12th, 2010 at 1:30 pm

    Unless you have nothing better to do than constantly refresh and read every post and every comment to every post than it was always like this anyway. I could never understand what half the people were talking about before, cause everyone was having their own conversations spread out through the entire comments.

  129. Erica - always OPPC - UNDO! February 12th, 2010 at 1:30 pm

    How small can we make the little box???

    And you do not look a day over 35!

  130. Jerkface February 12th, 2010 at 1:33 pm

    This is the kind of information that requires its own thread

  131. Wave Your Hat February 12th, 2010 at 1:35 pm

    So the new set-up works because people will ignore the new set-up? Huh?

    And game-day threads, not game threads, can sometimes run to a 1,000 comments. How are you going to check all of those?

    And you probably won’t reply to this because you won’t see my response because you’ve participated in at least a dozen threads by now.

  132. muffin stump February 12th, 2010 at 1:36 pm

    whatever happened to damon? did he actually sign somewhere?

  133. Erica - always OPPC - UNDO! February 12th, 2010 at 1:36 pm

    I just wanted to make sure your facts were clear!!! LOL

  134. Doreen - Ain't it Just "Grand"? February 12th, 2010 at 1:37 pm

    Thanks, Erica.

    I want to see how small the box will get, too. Is that not ridiculous!!!! I’m sure I could be doing ANYTHING else right now. :lol: :lol:

  135. Erica - always OPPC - UNDO! February 12th, 2010 at 1:38 pm

    No, but the talk is heating up. I miss him already!

  136. Nick in SF February 12th, 2010 at 1:39 pm

    I’m responding but is anyone seeing it???

  137. Camilo Gerardo February 12th, 2010 at 1:39 pm

    it is kind of dominating. an easy fix, eh?

  138. Doreen - Ain't it Just "Grand"? February 12th, 2010 at 1:39 pm

    But she was responding to you! :)

  139. Erica - always OPPC - UNDO! February 12th, 2010 at 1:40 pm

    Friday Before 3 Day Weekend + Crazy chaotic new blog format =

    Perfect storm of no work getting done!!!!

  140. Joekuh - P + C's :T-5! February 12th, 2010 at 1:41 pm

    At least you can edit bad spelling and everyone will know what it means! GB is probly screaming with joy about it right now…

  141. Erica - always OPPC - UNDO! February 12th, 2010 at 1:41 pm

    Not tiny yet!!!!

    Maybe I should discuss my lack of pantyhose more. LOL

  142. Wave Your Hat February 12th, 2010 at 1:42 pm

    Quick, which of the above comments in this thread am I responding to?

  143. muffin stump February 12th, 2010 at 1:42 pm

    man, i just read the “condition of use” paragraph. i better stop posting.

  144. george February 12th, 2010 at 1:43 pm

    i think it’s absolutely brilliant of Brian Cashman to get rid of the player who made what was no doubt the most significant World Series play – Damon’s Paul O’Neill vs. Armando Benitez-like at-bat and double-steal.

    that doesn’t happen, then the Phillies chances of winning game 4, and thus the series, would’ve increased dramatically, since Mo probably wouldn’t have pitched the 9th.

    I realize that postseason play alone is not a deciding factor, otherwise Brian Doyle would have a monument! But Damon is a good player whose applied his ‘tough at-bat’ and base-running skills in a clutch moment, and who’s shown an ability to play in big games, and clutch should get SOME consideration. especially for the NY Yankees!

  145. Doreen - Ain't it Just "Grand"? February 12th, 2010 at 1:43 pm

    I don’t know. Maybe this could work if we get the hang of it. But I do get the feeling there’s going to be too much scrolling around.

    I like following the different trains of thought of people. And it’s looking like you can tell the really compelling subject matters by all the boxes surrounding it.

  146. Joekuh - P + C's :T-5! February 12th, 2010 at 1:43 pm

    One thing about this format…GTLU will be MUCH easier.

  147. Erica - always OPPC - UNDO! February 12th, 2010 at 1:43 pm

    Are you obsene??? :-)

  148. Don February 12th, 2010 at 1:44 pm

    Right, I was also looking for some Johnny Damon discussion!

  149. muffin stump February 12th, 2010 at 1:44 pm

    so sorry erica. i held out hope that he’d be back for so long. i really will miss damon’s postgame interviews(and his postseason at bats!).

  150. Hoffa February 12th, 2010 at 1:44 pm

    This new format makes reading the comments a monumental task!

  151. Wave Your Hat February 12th, 2010 at 1:45 pm

    Nick, all the boxes look like 60′s op art.

  152. raymagnetic February 12th, 2010 at 1:45 pm

    Threaded comments get a gigantic thumbs down from me. I wholeheartedly agree with Sir Jerkface.

    That’s one of the reasons I prefer this blog to the RAB blog. Threaded comments on a blog suck!

  153. Doreen - Ain't it Just "Grand"? February 12th, 2010 at 1:45 pm

    Hi Nick in SF. I’m keeping my eye on this particular section. Trying to see how small we can make it before it disappears. :)

  154. Hoffa February 12th, 2010 at 1:46 pm

    No amount of time is going to make this work. Active conversation blogs are no place for threaded comments.

  155. muffin stump February 12th, 2010 at 1:46 pm

    no, but my thoughts are really vulgar and i wanted to defame a lot of posters during the johnny damon wars.

  156. Doreen - Ain't it Just "Grand"? February 12th, 2010 at 1:46 pm

    Yes!!!

  157. raymagnetic February 12th, 2010 at 1:48 pm

    This is ridiculous!

  158. Hoffa February 12th, 2010 at 1:48 pm

    Smaller….

  159. Erica - always OPPC - UNDO! February 12th, 2010 at 1:49 pm

    This is a post just to fill space. (Not much different than any other Erica post). I want to assist in making the box as tiny as possible but feel we need a longer reply to do it.

    So I am just typing for the sheer fun of typing.

    Thank you very much for your cooperation.

  160. muffin stump February 12th, 2010 at 1:49 pm

    don’t you love the integration of pantyhose and johnny d. in a single thread? jerkface is probably upset.

  161. Erica - always OPPC - UNDO! February 12th, 2010 at 1:51 pm

    I would have appreciated that!

  162. Bronx Jeers February 12th, 2010 at 1:51 pm

    The point is is that if I reply to a person who is using a mobile device, he’ll have no idea that my comment was meant for him/her.

    And if I’m on a mobile, I can’t reply nor will I know if someone replied to me.

  163. muffin stump February 12th, 2010 at 1:52 pm

    see, this observation was made earlier and the new reply format did not affect the “problem” of repeated comments.

  164. Doreen - Ain't it Just "Grand"? February 12th, 2010 at 1:52 pm

    This is filling space within Erica’s filling space post. However, I think it does show that at some point you lose contact with what the original post was that people were replying to.

  165. m February 12th, 2010 at 1:52 pm

    Hoffa,

    Well said.

    And as a dissenter, I’m starting a new thread. :P

  166. Bronx Jeers February 12th, 2010 at 1:53 pm

    smal….

  167. Nick in SF February 12th, 2010 at 1:54 pm

    I’m just scrolling up here to see who is rambling about Johnny Damon’s pantyhose.

  168. Doreen - Ain't it Just "Grand"? February 12th, 2010 at 1:55 pm

    It is also showing me, that if I am interested in only one topic of conversation, this format is okay. When I refresh I go immediately to where I last posted within that particular topic.

    But if I were following a couple of different topics, it would get tedious. Really fast.

  169. Dave F February 12th, 2010 at 1:55 pm

    Jennifer,

    Thanks much for the control F tip, great way to find things on the blog.

    Dave

  170. Erica - always OPPC - UNDO! February 12th, 2010 at 1:55 pm

    What are you talkign about?

    You learned I don’t wear pantyhose!

  171. JT February 12th, 2010 at 1:56 pm

    Yeah I get that. On a related topic, I’ve thought the mobile version sucks ever since they “upgraded” it. I hate having to load a new page to read a full post. It definitely makes the whole experience take LONGER for me, not shorter. I used to be able to go to the john in my office, load up the blog on my iphone and read a post or two. Now I’m done with my business by the time I even get a full post to load. TMI?

  172. Erica - always OPPC - UNDO! February 12th, 2010 at 1:56 pm

    Clever Nick!

  173. Doreen - Ain't it Just "Grand"? February 12th, 2010 at 1:57 pm

    Did you notice there’s now a button if you want to cancel a reply? That’s actually a good thing. I think. But you have to scroll up to get to the button which is at the top of the TOS.

  174. JT February 12th, 2010 at 1:58 pm

    I guess it was already “optimized” for iPhones because of the narrow column the posts appear in. But it probably wasn’t so great for other mobile devices.

  175. Pat M. February 12th, 2010 at 1:59 pm

    Wow, New look….Is there a real upside to this feature ???

  176. Doreen - Ain't it Just "Grand"? February 12th, 2010 at 2:00 pm

    Scroll up to the top and participate in our game – we’re trying to see how small the boxes can get before they disappear! You’ll notice the thread immediately!

  177. Doreen - Ain't it Just "Grand"? February 12th, 2010 at 2:01 pm

    Only if people search for the GTLU thread. Otherwise, it will be far worse!!!

  178. muffin stump February 12th, 2010 at 2:01 pm

    almost scrolled past your post. think one of the reasons the lohud blog has been so successful is the sense of community that’s been created, not just the exchange of information and argument. is this what you mean by an active conversation blog?

    jeff, are we stressing the system yet?

  179. Rick February 12th, 2010 at 2:02 pm

    This will take some getting used to. Hopefully it doesn’t invite argumentive posts or some “hit and run” trolling from fans of other teams.

  180. vb03 February 12th, 2010 at 2:02 pm

    With this format, each post is essentially its own thread.

  181. vb03 February 12th, 2010 at 2:03 pm

    Another thing, this format invites very personal attacks, especially since you can target a single user.

  182. muffin stump February 12th, 2010 at 2:03 pm

    or maybe the really inane conversations about pantyhose, as jerkface put it. :) i agree, though, too much scrolling around.

  183. Doreen - Ain't it Just "Grand"? February 12th, 2010 at 2:04 pm

    I almost wish I had some more snow to shovel.

  184. muffin stump February 12th, 2010 at 2:05 pm

    oh, i meant this response to doreen’s last post. did i hit the wrong reply button, or is this a kink in the system?

  185. Doreen - Ain't it Just "Grand"? February 12th, 2010 at 2:06 pm

    And now, I’m talking to myself up here.

  186. Pat M. February 12th, 2010 at 2:06 pm

    Doreen, what does the smaller boxes represent ???? I’m not the very savy when it comes to computer features….Just witness my keyboard skills..GB infliction

  187. raymagnetic February 12th, 2010 at 2:07 pm

    Pat M. I don’t see any real upside to this feature at all. But apparently quite a few posters enjoy it this way.

  188. Wave Your Hat February 12th, 2010 at 2:07 pm

    You moron, will you get with the program and go scroll through and find the most appropriate thread to put your comment in so that you can participate in the most appropriate conversation in an organized way?

    (jk about the moron business)

  189. Doreen - Ain't it Just "Grand"? February 12th, 2010 at 2:08 pm

    But it is getting really small now. I wonder if it would just go to one word per line?

  190. raymagnetic February 12th, 2010 at 2:08 pm

    I was Pete’s idea to do the pinch hitting thing. They just carried on the tradition.

  191. Holden February 12th, 2010 at 2:08 pm

    this is cool :( I getting DIZZY already!

  192. steveoh February 12th, 2010 at 2:09 pm

    Sorry, I appreciate the efforts of the programmer(s), but this format just plain sucks.

  193. Holden February 12th, 2010 at 2:09 pm

    more time consuming, too!

  194. Doreen - Ain't it Just "Grand"? February 12th, 2010 at 2:11 pm

    Well, Pat M., every time you reply within a reply, the box around the reply gets smaller and smaller. It is really of no signficance, except as a game on this first day of nesting posts.

    I can see the possibilities the nesting would allow for – but I think overall there are more disadvantages in a forum such as this one.

  195. muffin stump February 12th, 2010 at 2:12 pm

    oh, here’s the experiment! :)

  196. Wave Your Hat February 12th, 2010 at 2:13 pm

    Suppose for instance the Yanks just announced they traded Joba for Shin-Soo Choo. Can you imagine how insanely chaotic the comments would be under this new system?

  197. Hoffa February 12th, 2010 at 2:14 pm

    Sma…

  198. muffin stump February 12th, 2010 at 2:14 pm

    when i refresh the blog page, it’s not taking me to the last post or the bottom anymore.

  199. Doreen - Ain't it Just "Grand"? February 12th, 2010 at 2:14 pm

    This would be a really fun place to post the rules for the GTLU v2, wouldn’t it? I mean, who would bother follow this nest inward to see the last response? I suggest no one would bother.

  200. muffin stump February 12th, 2010 at 2:15 pm

    oh, wait, it did that last time. sorry.

  201. rover February 12th, 2010 at 2:15 pm

    Not 100% alone

  202. Holden February 12th, 2010 at 2:15 pm
  203. Matt February 12th, 2010 at 2:16 pm

    Thanks for the positive comments. It looks like the Yankees are doomed before they even go to spring training.

  204. Nick in SF February 12th, 2010 at 2:17 pm

    We are the change we’ve been waiting for?

  205. Hoffa February 12th, 2010 at 2:17 pm

    OK, how about we do a thread of votes for who likes or dislikes this new format? If you like it answer with “Yes” and if you dislike it answer with “No”.

  206. rover February 12th, 2010 at 2:17 pm

    I don’t remember playing baseball to be akin to working out

  207. Dave F February 12th, 2010 at 2:17 pm

    Interesting article about Heyman pushing Boras agenda.
    http://hardballtalk.nbcsports......d.html.php

  208. Hoffa February 12th, 2010 at 2:17 pm

    NO!

  209. Hoffa February 12th, 2010 at 2:18 pm

    Very philosophical.

  210. Nick in SF February 12th, 2010 at 2:19 pm

    Soon only Edwar will be able to fit in here.

  211. Hoffa February 12th, 2010 at 2:20 pm

    If you think this thread looks bad now, wait until you have threaded comments during a game.

  212. steveoh February 12th, 2010 at 2:20 pm

    No.

  213. Doreen - Ain't it Just "Grand"? February 12th, 2010 at 2:21 pm

    Ooh – we’re getting there! Is anyone else experiencing a slowdown when they refresh?

  214. Erica - always OPPC - UNDO! February 12th, 2010 at 2:21 pm

    Are you changing the rules up at all?

  215. muffin stump February 12th, 2010 at 2:21 pm

    okay. :idea: it’s definitely a friday afternoon at work in the off season. sad, really. :P

  216. Erica - always OPPC - UNDO! February 12th, 2010 at 2:22 pm

    I am laughing so hard at my desk right now!!!

  217. raymagnetic February 12th, 2010 at 2:22 pm

    I can definitely imagine how crazy it will be. I don’t think this format will be around all that long however.

  218. Erica - always OPPC - UNDO! February 12th, 2010 at 2:22 pm

    MUST MAKE BOX SMALLER!!!!

  219. muffin stump February 12th, 2010 at 2:23 pm

    how about prizes?

  220. Erica - always OPPC - UNDO! February 12th, 2010 at 2:23 pm

    Me me!!!

  221. vb03 February 12th, 2010 at 2:23 pm

    See how personal it is?!?!? lol

  222. Hoffa February 12th, 2010 at 2:23 pm

    I am too!

  223. Hoffa February 12th, 2010 at 2:24 pm

    How small can we go?

  224. Doreen - Ain't it Just "Grand"? February 12th, 2010 at 2:24 pm

    Erica -

    Not significantly. Mostly to do with timing. I’m deciding whether or not to accept changes (not entire lineups, but, if someone puts two DHs, allow them to change it. I figured spring training will give me the opportunity to see what’ll work.

  225. vb03 February 12th, 2010 at 2:24 pm

    Just like last year!

  226. Hoffa February 12th, 2010 at 2:25 pm

    Me too.

  227. Doreen - Ain't it Just "Grand"? February 12th, 2010 at 2:25 pm

    This may possible be one of the most silly things I’ve done with my time in quite a while!!

  228. Pat M. February 12th, 2010 at 2:26 pm

    Wave, once the season starts and we have a 1,000 in game posting it’ll be insane here…..

  229. Nick in SF February 12th, 2010 at 2:26 pm

    yes, along with overall suckage, this is making the blog slower too. :mad:

  230. Doreen - Ain't it Just "Grand"? February 12th, 2010 at 2:26 pm

    I don’t know. Have to think about that one.

  231. Hoffa February 12th, 2010 at 2:27 pm

    Agreed! Me too.

  232. Joekuh - P + C's :T-5! February 12th, 2010 at 2:27 pm

    only because I didn’t look to see if she, or anyone else, made a comment about it.

    lol @ the GLTU getting that much worse. you could always have a hyperlink back to the game thread to clear up confusion. Well, you’d clear confusion for the contestants at least…

  233. Doreen - Ain't it Just "Grand"? February 12th, 2010 at 2:28 pm

    Are we going for skinny and long, or more like a square?

  234. Pat M. February 12th, 2010 at 2:28 pm

    Game day posting’s will be interesting…..Too much scrolling up and down to locate responses

  235. Erica - always OPPC - UNDO! February 12th, 2010 at 2:28 pm

    I usually allowed that if it was an honest mistake.

    But I drew the line at people just changing their minds.

  236. Doreen - Ain't it Just "Grand"? February 12th, 2010 at 2:29 pm

    This is insane!

  237. Erica - always OPPC - UNDO! February 12th, 2010 at 2:29 pm

    The lag is a giant drawback

  238. Hoffa February 12th, 2010 at 2:29 pm

    Well I was simply going for smaller, but I think the skinny long may prove the point better. It appears that we may be close to reaching the size limit.

  239. Erica - always OPPC - UNDO! February 12th, 2010 at 2:30 pm

    I’d also think this makes it harder for Sam/Chad/Josh to monitor what people are saying

  240. Mark- Can't Touch This February 12th, 2010 at 2:31 pm

    huh?

  241. Nick in SF February 12th, 2010 at 2:31 pm

    :shock:

  242. Joekuh - P + C's :T-5! February 12th, 2010 at 2:31 pm

    jmarx@lohud.com

    Email the tech guy if you have complaints. Much simpler way to express yourself, IMO.

  243. Doreen - Ain't it Just "Grand"? February 12th, 2010 at 2:32 pm

    Do you think we can break the blog? I don’t really want to do that.

  244. Joekuh - P + C's :T-5! February 12th, 2010 at 2:32 pm

    But now is a good time to test new things out, before the games, and the inevitable trolling and crying, start.

  245. vb03 February 12th, 2010 at 2:32 pm

    Game day would be a giant mess with this system, definitely.

  246. raymagnetic February 12th, 2010 at 2:33 pm

    Reading it on my iPhone sucks even more! :x I have no idea what anyone is talking about :(

  247. muffin stump February 12th, 2010 at 2:35 pm

    how about all the gtlu winners go into a weekly drawing. the winner of the weekly drawing gets a cheesy coffee mug or t-shirt from the folks who brought us these shrinking boxes–um, i mean the gracious people at lohud. they’ll rake in even more ad revenue with the increased traffic.

    given that i’ve never won gtlu, i don’t have a vested interest here.

  248. Doreen - Ain't it Just "Grand"? February 12th, 2010 at 2:36 pm

    Pinstripes!

  249. Nick in SF February 12th, 2010 at 2:36 pm

    Poor Edwar :sad:

  250. sab February 12th, 2010 at 2:37 pm

    Chad, Sam, Josh, Jeff – Why not just take vote right now – it seems the main Lohud Bloggers are here to vote on…

    the one thing I’m not Lady gaga over is the continuing shrinking box when someone replies to a reply to a reply to a reply…it looks like if there are enough replies to a comment (and on here its not hard to do) the box would get as small as a thumbnail which would make it rather impossible to read…if anything Lohudders are pretty good at a quick read and analysis (the main concept of the book Blink by Malcolm Gladwell)so i’m sure they already have a decision made….unlike the damon saga lets gets this thing decided rather quickly

  251. muffin stump February 12th, 2010 at 2:37 pm

    your text has broken out of the box!

  252. Doreen - Ain't it Just "Grand"? February 12th, 2010 at 2:38 pm

    Got the nest down to pinstripes.

  253. muffin stump February 12th, 2010 at 2:40 pm

    check out the thread at the top of the page. the boxes got so thin and small that the text broke out. and, as someone noticed, it looks like pinstripes.

  254. vb03 February 12th, 2010 at 2:41 pm

    You can never tell who replied where and when they did so. The timestamps are all over the place with the nested replies.

  255. CountryClub February 12th, 2010 at 2:41 pm

    Nope, I’m here. Me delay was due to me getting some lunch. What I was trying to say was that people dont really have conversations during games. They say things like “YES!” when someone hits a HR or “Mitre sucks!!!” when he’s knocked out in the 2nd. There’s very little back and forth becasue the game moves too quickly. So there’s no reason to really reply to anyone.

  256. Joekuh - P + C's :T-5! February 12th, 2010 at 2:42 pm

    This site isn’t just for “a chosen few” of Lohud bloggers. That’s kinda shortsighted, dont you think? We’re (mostly) all here to talk baseball, not how the site is set up. Try it for a week, see how it works, THEN take a vote.

  257. upstate kate February 12th, 2010 at 2:42 pm

    In theory this sounds like a good idea. You could just read/respond to the posts you are interested in. In reality, it is very time consuming if you just want to cruise through and see what is going on.

  258. Doreen - Ain't it Just "Grand"? February 12th, 2010 at 2:43 pm

    Oh God. Too Funny Nick!

  259. JeterJobaCanoFan2010 February 12th, 2010 at 2:44 pm

    As a #1 Joba fan, this post is great. I remember that Joba had a great ERA at the start of 2009 and it was well documented by some columnists. Give Joba credit for sticking to what the Yankees planned for him in 2009. It was frustrating to watch as a fan. How did Aceves get 10 wins – by mopping up for Joba in the late season. A couple of times he had 2-3 good innings and he would be pulled and he could possibly won the game.

    As far as his development – 2009 was the worst. If Phil does become #5, he will have restrictions on IP, mean while Joba will be wasted in the pen waiting to pitch ONE inning.

  260. CountryClub February 12th, 2010 at 2:45 pm

    Email the IT address they gave us up top. RiverAveBlues has threaded comments and it works on mobil devices. So Lohud should be able to fix it.

  261. J9D February 12th, 2010 at 2:46 pm

    SJ — A great accomplishment for your nephew. Will be a tremendous experience no matter what happens. I’m betting he does great.

  262. CountryClub February 12th, 2010 at 2:47 pm

    Yes, because they should pay Damon for what he did last yr and not for what they think he’ll do in the future. And people keep ignoring that the Yanks offered him 14 mil and he turned it down.

  263. Nick in SF February 12th, 2010 at 2:48 pm

    Do the comments appear chronologically on an iphone? I’m on my blackberry now and there is still nesting, though no pinstriped boxes.

    It still looks ridiculous and would make following along very difficult.

    Lost in all this silliness is Cashman confirnation that the Yankees did make a real run at Johnny Damon even AFTER they’s signed Nick Johnson.

    And the best Yankee news of the day (so far!): that Phil Hughes might be learning something from Christian Garcia.

  264. Holden February 12th, 2010 at 2:56 pm

    this is cool :( I getting DIZZY already!

  265. Holden February 12th, 2010 at 2:56 pm

    Diminutive, eh?

  266. tk February 12th, 2010 at 2:58 pm

    Cool article. I read Heyman’s orginal article and was going to bring up how transparent he’s become–I mean, he no longer makes any attempt to hide his pro-Boras agenda. The author raised some really good points, especially the last one about Damon’s original demands not really being his, but rather just a public creation. So I guess it was actually people like us that overvalued Johnny and misread the market…Does that mean we need to go into spin mode??

  267. Sam Borden February 12th, 2010 at 3:01 pm

    New post on Joba and Phil already working out in Tampa. Bring your love for the new threads on over!

  268. sab February 12th, 2010 at 3:01 pm

    although i agree – but the “chosen few” on here do carry alot of weight – and they tend to rule with a iron hand at times (not that i’m opposed to it) – as well as they are on here all the time so who best to decide but the ones that made this blog what it is today – i don’t know if the “casual observer/commenter” should have as much input as the hardcore bloggers – just my opinion.

  269. Bronx Born February 12th, 2010 at 3:07 pm

    That is so very cool SJ. I wish him the best

  270. mike eff February 12th, 2010 at 3:33 pm

    Agreed G Love

  271. Tom B February 12th, 2010 at 3:39 pm

    I think you are completely missing something here.

    Threaded comment sections ARE in fact better. In every way possible.

    THIS particular implementation of it is not because it does not bump the updated threads.

    Fangraphs lives off of a comments section similar to this, and they survive, you’ll just have to get used to it.

  272. Tom B February 12th, 2010 at 3:43 pm

    your argument against this is completely ridiculous. the only problem is that they implemented the threads in a poor fashion. If it was threaded and reordered by last post, there would be nothing for you to complain about.

    so stop crying about “threaded” being the problem. if you don’t understand how it is infinitely more organized, you are a fool.

  273. Rob NY -- 2009 The Road to Redemption February 12th, 2010 at 4:42 pm

    Yeah I just read them all lol and still enjoyed it. Pinstriped Comments FTW.

    I do hit ctl F and it’s the easiest way to find somebody I know generally makes sense and working the conversation from a position of sanity. That is if I missed the conversation as it happened. It isn’t more work, just doing things in a way that makes more sense to me.

  274. Rob NY -- 2009 The Road to Redemption February 12th, 2010 at 4:49 pm

    Sam, you’re awesome. As is the new threading system. But I’d be bucking the popular sentiment here to say you should keep it.

  275. Smacketh Downeth February 12th, 2010 at 5:08 pm

    Way to go, Rob – you succeeded in getting one word per line. Wonder what will happen with this post?

  276. hmmm February 12th, 2010 at 11:18 pm

    Can you see this?

Leave a comment below

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Forgotten Password
Cancel

Sponsored by:
 

Search

    Advertisement

    Follow

    Mobile

    Read The LoHud Yankees Blog on the go by navigating to the blog on your smartphone or mobile device's browser. No apps or downloads are required.

    LoHud TV

    More Videos

Advertisement

Place an ad

Call (914) 694-3581