The LoHud Yankees Blog

A New York Yankees blog by Chad Jennings and the staff of The Journal News


Pregame notes: Garcia hopeful about bruised pitching hand

Posted by: Chad Jennings - Posted in Misc on Mar 15, 2012 Print This Post Print This Post | Email This Post Email This Post

Freddy Garcia has his right hand heavily wrapped and admits that it still hurts “a little bit,” but he’s also hopeful that he won’t miss more than a few days of pitching.

“Bad bruise, that’s all,” he said.

After being hit by a one-hopper in yesterday’s game against the Blue Jays, Garcia’s had began to swell immediately and he was taken for x-rays that showed no broken bones. Garcia hasn’t really been able to test the hand and said he hasn’t been given any sort of timetable for when he’ll be able to pitch again.

That said, he seem optimistic. The injury seems less serious than even he initially believed, but it might still be too early to say exactly how long Garcia will be out.

“I just have to wait,” he said.

A few other real quick notes before I get on the road…

• Talked to D.J. Mitchell a little bit this morning. Yesterday he used a new cutter for the first time in a game. He had tinkered with it in bullpen sessions late last season and likes it because the movement is the opposite of his two-seamer. It’s clearly a fourth pitch for him behind his fastball, changeup and curveball.

• Speaking of working on pitches . . . Boone Logan threw a bullpen today and focuses strictly on fastballs and changeups. He said he’s been using a few more changeups this spring and would like to carry that into the season. He’s always had a changeup, but he usually leans heavily on his fastball and slider.

• George Kontos thors his second batting practice today. David Phelps and Ivan Nova are also scheduled to throw sides.

• Mitchell and Manny Banuelos have sides tomorrow. Garcia is listed as throwing a side tomorrow, but I doubt that’s actually going to happen.

• Today’s available pitchers: Michael Pineda, Brett Marshall, Juan Cedeno, Clay Rapada, Mike O’Connor, Cesar Cabral, Adam Warren and Graham Stoneburner.

• Today’s second string: C J.R. Murphy, 1B Jose Gil, 2B David Adams, SS Doug Bernier, 3B Brandon Laird, LF Justin Maxwell, CF Melky Mesa, RF Zoilo Almonte, DH Gary Sanchez

Comments

comments

 

Advertisement

304 Responses to “Pregame notes: Garcia hopeful about bruised pitching hand”

  1. MTU March 15th, 2012 at 10:01 am

    Nice assortment to young arms to watch today.

    :)

  2. Rich in NJ March 15th, 2012 at 10:04 am

    The Yankees already were taking notice and were at least considering Phelps for a major league relief role this year in a vein similar to what Hector Noesi did last year. The likelihood, though, is he will go to Scranton and join what the scout said “will probably be the best rotation in the minors.””

    It’s like heroin for them.

  3. MTU March 15th, 2012 at 10:09 am

    Rich-

    I don’t have that much of a problem with a guy pitching out of the pen as long as they are not
    yo-yo’ed around during the season.

    That’s what I am opposed to personally.

    If the role is consistent for the year it should not be that much of a problem.

  4. MTU March 15th, 2012 at 10:11 am

    Rosy-

    If you’re out there.

    I think you’re gonna find that Noesi is way better than a #5 starter in your rotation.

    JMO.

    ;)

  5. stuckey March 15th, 2012 at 10:13 am

    “It’s like heroin for them.”

    Addicting to having good pitchers on their 25 man roster.

    Someone get them some methadone!

    I mean look what they did to Noesi? Scranton didn’t make the postseason last year (a high priority) and now he’s not stretched out enough to help them this year.

    Oh wait…

    I mean they hurt his trade value…

    Oh… ummm, give me a few minutes, I’ll get this right eventually.

  6. Rich in NJ March 15th, 2012 at 10:13 am

    MTU

    Cashman said after the season that he didn’t like the way they used Noesi, that it was a wasted year. Why do that again when you have Garcia for that role?

    Right now, their rotation from 2013 on is in flux. They have a lot of candidates, but they need to give each the best chance to succeed. This type of thinking doesn’t do that.

  7. Rich in NJ March 15th, 2012 at 10:19 am

    ‘the yankees management never understood what kind of pitcher he was.

    they fell under the sabermetric dogma that wang was just being lucky winning with such a low strike out rate.”

    I don’t buy this at all, randy. I think they handled his rehab poorly and had him pitching in the ML before he was ready, but what did they do to devalue his role while he was healthy? Nothing.

    And again, asking AL pitchers to bat in NL parks is ridiculously reckless.

  8. pat March 15th, 2012 at 10:20 am

    Bryce Harper is like a baseball player and a psych study in human behavior all rolled into one.

    http://www.gq.com/sports/guide.....ll-preview

  9. The Genius Maker March 15th, 2012 at 10:20 am

    Randy I
    baseball is a game of probabilities and then hunches land on top of the probabilities.

    that was the billy beane character in the moneyball movie.

    he believed in probability but he strongly went with his hunches too.
    **************

    Actually, Billy Beane mostly used what the stats said and that was the entire premise as any hunch or opinion on what the scouts saw is not reliable because it has bias. He looked at the stats

  10. Crawdaddy March 15th, 2012 at 10:21 am

    “Cashman said after the season that he didn’t like the way they used Noesi, that it was a wasted year. Why do that again when you have Garcia for that role?”

    Which is why Phelps will most likely be in AAA this season.

    The difference with Noesi is that Phelps has already been stretched out with over a 170 innings already in AAA. There isn’t much more for him to learn at AAA. However, with Garcia present that’s will he’ll be in April.

  11. blake March 15th, 2012 at 10:23 am

    “Cashman said after the season that he didn’t like the way they used Noesi, that it was a wasted year. Why do that again when you have Garcia for that role?”

    Duh…they should have realized that last year…..they didn’t need Noesi in the big leagues.

  12. Crawdaddy March 15th, 2012 at 10:24 am

    By the way, those 170-180 AAA innings for Phelps is over a two year period and with him turning 26 later this year, I think he’s ready for the majors.

  13. The Genius Maker March 15th, 2012 at 10:25 am

    I don’t think the Yankees did anything wrong with the approach to Wang with the exception of not getting the rehab correct, but that happens all the time. They knew what they had in Wang and it is similar with Nova. They do not get a lot of strikeouts, but they don’t get centered often because of the movement. Wang’s biggest issue was that he didn’t have secondary pitches if the sinker wasn’t working, but when he was throwing 95 with great sink it was very tough. Nova has a larger repertoire of good moving stuff and his success will be hinged on his control IMO as his stuff is good.

  14. Crawdaddy March 15th, 2012 at 10:25 am

    “Duh…they should have realized that last year…..they didn’t need Noesi in the big leagues.”

    Yet, they traded him as his trade value was high due to that major league experience.

  15. MTU March 15th, 2012 at 10:27 am

    That’s my point with a guy like Phelps.

    he’s already made his innings limits to be ready for the Ml.

    not only that he is a little older than some of the others.

    Just much more of a finished product.

    If he spent the year at ML level in a consistent role I don’t think it would hurt his development.

    Most likely he just goes back to AAA.

    Rich-

    I understand where you are coming from. There has been much to be desired in the developmental
    approach in the past.

    let’s just hope that it is in the past.

    Some of the signs that it is may be evident in the way guys like the 2 B’s are being handled thus far.

  16. Rich in NJ March 15th, 2012 at 10:27 am

    We don’t know that Noesi’s value wouldn’t have been higher if he had a regular role as a mL starter having a great year. I suspect it would have been. Or maybe, if that had happened, they wouldn’t have believed they needed to add a starter.

  17. blake March 15th, 2012 at 10:29 am

    I like Nova a lot….he may be a career 3rd or 4th starter but I think his upside is higher than that if his slider continues to develop and if he can limit walks. He gets ground balls and he competes…..even if he is a mid rotation starter but a consistent one that’s really valuable these days.

  18. blake March 15th, 2012 at 10:30 am

    “Yet, they traded him as his trade value was high due to that major league experience.”

    Eh…I think his value was mainly established in the minors where he was pretty good…..he was inconsistent last year out of the pen. They wasted a year of service time with him…..

  19. Crawdaddy March 15th, 2012 at 10:31 am

    “We don’t know that Noesi’s value wouldn’t have been higher if he had a regular role as a mL starter having a great year. I suspect it would have been. Or maybe, if that had happened, they wouldn’t have believed they needed to add a starter.”

    Noesi at AAA as a starter last year wouldn’t have stopped them from getting Pineda or Kuroda. Also, in my opinion, a pitcher performing in the majors effectively already appears to be more valuable to me than someone tolling in the minors especially if you already know that pitcher can be a starting pitcher. Anyhow that’s my story and I’m sticking to it.

  20. Crawdaddy March 15th, 2012 at 10:33 am

    “Eh…I think his value was mainly established in the minors where he was pretty good…..he was inconsistent last year out of the pen. They wasted a year of service time with him…..”

    Then that’s where you and I disagree because I think he showed enough in the majors last year that he could be an effective major league pitcher. Pitching at SWB against mostly career minor league hitters only enhances the value so much.

  21. MTU March 15th, 2012 at 10:33 am

    Not that it necessarily counts for anything but a guy like Cone has stated in the past that he thought that the Pen was an excellent training ground for ML starters.

    I think he thought it was like a confidence-builder get-your-feet-wet kinda’ thing.

    FWIW.

  22. blake March 15th, 2012 at 10:34 am

    I believe you sign Serge Mitres to be long men for your big league club……I don’t like taking one of your minor league starters and putting them in that role because it screws with their development and it also wastes their service time. Sign expendable journeymen for the unimportant mop up man role….

  23. Rich in NJ March 15th, 2012 at 10:34 am

    Craw

    Kuroda is the kind of deal you always sign (upside, just money).

    We don’t know what they would have done on Pineda. They were after Felix. I may not agree, but I get that. He’s close to a sure thing, young, and although not cheap, they can afford him if they want.

    I think a pitcher gains value with ML experience, but only in the role he is being used in, unless he is beyond awesome, which is so rare that when it happens, that pitcher isn’t often traded.

  24. stuckey March 15th, 2012 at 10:35 am

    “Duh…they should have realized that last year…..they didn’t need Noesi in the big leagues.”

    Blake, were there any negative ramifications?

  25. blake March 15th, 2012 at 10:35 am

    “Then that’s where you and I disagree because I think he showed enough in the majors last year that he could be an effective major league pitcher.”

    That’s true…..but I don’t think they brought him up for his trade value…..or anything like that.

  26. Crawdaddy March 15th, 2012 at 10:35 am

    “I believe you sign Serge Mitres to be long men for your big league club……I don’t like taking one of your minor league starters and putting them in that role because it screws with their development and it also wastes their service time. Sign expendable journeymen for the unimportant mop up man role….”

    Actually, I don’t like any Serge Mitres near my ballclub. Furthermore, how are you fooling with Phelps development? He’s already major league ready. So is Noesi.

  27. MTU March 15th, 2012 at 10:37 am

    I don’t think it’s the role so much as the yo-yo’ing that sometimes goes on that might be detrimental
    to our young guys.

    ML experience, even out of the pen, has got to be a positive thing in my eyes.

    That said, Phelps is probably on his way back to AAA to await a callup.

  28. blake March 15th, 2012 at 10:37 am

    “Blake, were there any negative ramifications?”

    He had to pitch winter ball to get innings where he coukd have gotten hurt or kidnapped and they wasted a year of service time…..not really….but were there any real positive ramifications for him being in the bigs last year?

  29. Crawdaddy March 15th, 2012 at 10:38 am

    “That’s true…..but I don’t think they brought him up for his trade value…..or anything like that.”

    I never said they did and if you thought I implied that then that’s not what I’m saying.

  30. Crawdaddy March 15th, 2012 at 10:40 am

    “He had to pitch winter ball to get innings where he coukd have gotten hurt or kidnapped and they wasted a year of service time…..not really….but were there any real positive ramifications for him being in the bigs last year?”

    Yeah, there is as you give him a good taste on what it takes to be major league pitcher and hanging around the great Rivera is another positive result.

  31. blake March 15th, 2012 at 10:40 am

    “. Furthermore, how are you fooling with Phelps development? He’s already major league ready. So is Noesi.”

    I don’t think its good to take a guy that is ready innings wise for the big leagues and make then a reliever and then have to stretch them back out again unless you really need them on the big league roster…….if you need a set up man like they did in 2009 with Hughes then while its still not ideal its understandable…….I don’t think it is to do it for an important mop up role.

  32. Crawdaddy March 15th, 2012 at 10:42 am

    “I don’t think it’s the role so much as the yo-yo’ing that sometimes goes on that might be detrimental to our young guys.”

    Right, what they did with Hughes and Joba going back and forth was wrong in my opinion. You give them a taste of the majors, but not to detriment of their overall development as you define their final role as major league players.

  33. stuckey March 15th, 2012 at 10:42 am

    “but were there any real positive ramifications for him being in the bigs last year?”

    If we did, it would be pure speculation. Which is my point. Noesi seems have been a factor in landing a pitching prospect some are already including in Top 100 lists.

    Just not sure we’re on a solid track by using what might of happened in an alternative reality as the basis of criticism, ignoring what actually happened, which in my estimation doesn’t equate to his value having been lowered.

  34. MTU March 15th, 2012 at 10:43 am

    Blake-

    Anytime a young guy can show that he can get ML hitters out with authority and consistency that has to have some value to the Yankees.

    MiLB #’s are just that.

    I do not like it when they adopt the “all handson deck mentality” and just yo-yo the guy around to suit the need of the moment.

    Especially if that is detrimental to a young guy’s career path.

    That I am against.

  35. Crawdaddy March 15th, 2012 at 10:45 am

    “I don’t think its good to take a guy that is ready innings wise for the big leagues and make then a reliever and then have to stretch them back out again unless you really need them on the big league roster…….if you need a set up man like they did in 2009 with Hughes then while its still not ideal its understandable…….I don’t think it is to do it for an important mop up role.”

    Each case is different, but I’m against the back and forth type of roles. The problem with Hughes is that I don’t think he had enough AAA time and his stretching out was already hampered by injuries in 2007 and 2008.

  36. Crawdaddy March 15th, 2012 at 10:47 am

    “I do not like it when they adopt the “all handson deck mentality” and just yo-yo the guy around to suit the need of the moment.”

    I’m against the yo-yo process too.

  37. trisha - true pinstriped blue March 15th, 2012 at 10:47 am

    YOWZA. I will NEVER again go through on this forum what I went through last night. I hope anyway. It’s a lot more fun skimming through posts when people are going at it ad nauseum and I’m not one of them. The killer is that it threw the rest of my night off and I ended up watching television into the wee hours and got no sleep.

    1. In terms of probabilities, I am predicting that the highest probability is that both Pineda and Montero will end up being huge. In fact, I’m predicting that at 100%.

    2. I don’t think there is any question that we’re going to miss Montero, but I guess that remains to be see, just like whether Pineda is the beast I say he is, remains to be seen.

    3. As I have been the Nats adopted mommy for a real long time, I will have real tears (probably figurative and literal) watching today’s game especially since CM will be pitching for them. I am so proud of what they have become as a team and so excited for their future.

    That said, I am hoping for a variation of what Kate said. A real pitcher’s show down, and then, in the last inning, an unearned run for the Ys when a Nats outfielder misplays a fly ball in the sun.

    Morning all!

  38. Shame Spencer March 15th, 2012 at 10:49 am

    “The Yankees already were taking notice and were at least considering Phelps for a major league relief role this year in a vein similar to what Hector Noesi did last year.”

    Why would we want to give Phelps a grand total of 60 innings as a reward?

  39. MTU March 15th, 2012 at 10:50 am

    I think the Yankees used to confuse good short-term results with full development, and they also
    had a much stronger “all hands on deck” mentality.

    I’m not sure if that attitude is completely washed out yet but if it is not it should be IMO.

    Making mistakes with the first crop, though unfortunate, was somewhat understandable.

    Repeating such mistakes would not be.

    The evidence of the 2B’s handling suggests that the Yankees have learned something.

    They built depth into the ML rotation so they would not have to rush guys.

    I hope their MiLB development approach reaches the highest standards of quality so that we can reap the rewards of all of our Pitching potential.

    Fingers crossed that the important lessons have been learned.

  40. Crawdaddy March 15th, 2012 at 10:51 am

    “Why would we want to give Phelps a grand total of 60 innings as a reward?”

    Because it beats going to SWB for the third straight year.

  41. Jerkface March 15th, 2012 at 10:52 am

    Noesi’s role as potential spot starter for this year was in danger because he didn’t pitch a lot of innings. Nova managed to grab ~45 innings in the majors in 2010 while pitching 180 total. Noesi pitched 80 innings last year and wasted almost a full year of service. If they want Phelps in the pen they should be prepared to use him to pitch a lot of innings. I’d rather Phelps innings in the majors come from spot starts, which would be more representative of the type of player he is, rather than some innings in relief.

  42. MTU March 15th, 2012 at 10:56 am

    The Yankees have made a fairly substantial bet on their young Pitching.

    If they fail to develop it well from here on out they are simply dumber than dog snot.

    They may have made some mistakes in the past but I have to believe they are no longer that dumb.

    Prove me right Cashman.

    ;)

  43. Jerkface March 15th, 2012 at 10:57 am

    Phelps only had 100 innings last year, picked up some more in the AFL, but having back to back years below 150 wouldn’t be productive.

  44. Jerkface March 15th, 2012 at 10:58 am

    Because it beats going to SWB for the third straight year.

    Every player would chose the majors, most likely, over the minors, but doesn’t mean its the best for them going forward. Hughes didn’t want to go back down in 09 but it was likely a major factor in his 2011 fatigue.

  45. dogface March 15th, 2012 at 10:59 am

    Why would we want to give Phelps a grand total of 60 innings as a reward?

    ================================

    Because on this team, that’s the role he fits in. If he were in the farm system of a 2nd division team, maybe he’s up and in that rotation. He’s not, so you plug him in the role that best suits the team. Given a choice between 170 IP for the Nomadics or 60 IP for the NEW YORK YANKEES, I’m guessing Phelps happily chooses the latter.

  46. Shame Spencer March 15th, 2012 at 11:01 am

    Crawdaddy March 15th, 2012 at 10:51 am

    “Why would we want to give Phelps a grand total of 60 innings as a reward?”

    Because it beats going to SWB for the third straight year.

    ————————

    If they’re gonna put him in the pen, he should be allowed to pitch. Not that mop up work that Noesi was mostly given.

  47. Jerkface March 15th, 2012 at 11:02 am

    Given a choice between 170 IP for the Nomadics or 60 IP for the NEW YORK YANKEES, I’m guessing Phelps happily chooses the latter

    He could get 60 IP for the Yankees while also pitching enough for the Nomadics to actually maintain himself as a starter. If the Yankees used him smartly. The Yankees got 56 innings out of Noesi of a 4.5 ERA but he was pitching in mostly blow outs. Useful? Arguably. The right role for a guy that is pegged as a major league starter? Probably not.

  48. MTU March 15th, 2012 at 11:03 am

    Why not keep Phelps @ AAA until later in the season and then bring him up to help out of the pen ?

    That way we get the best of both worlds.

    Nah. Makes too much sense.

    ;)

  49. Shame Spencer March 15th, 2012 at 11:04 am

    “Given a choice between 170 IP for the Nomadics or 60 IP for the NEW YORK YANKEES, I’m guessing Phelps happily chooses the latter.”

    And how does this help the 2013 Yankees? I thought this organization had a long term plan lol, that’s what everyone keeps telling me.

  50. trisha - true pinstriped blue March 15th, 2012 at 11:04 am

    MTU, I’m for keeping the guys down in the minors for as long as possible, without going past their expiration date. To me that ends up working out best for them and for the team.

  51. blake March 15th, 2012 at 11:04 am

    Id rather Phelps start every day in the minors than throw 60 meaningless big league innings.

  52. randy l. March 15th, 2012 at 11:04 am

    “I don’t buy this at all, randy. I think they handled his rehab poorly and had him pitching in the ML before he was ready, but what did they do to devalue his role while he was healthy? Nothing.”

    rich in nj-

    get my email from pat m or sj44 or from chad.

    i’ll send you what i know in an email , but not on the blog .

    i’m assuming that you know that neil allen totally transformed wang in the space of a few weeks into a sinker baller after thinking he had the right arm slot for it.

    neil and i are very close friends. trust me when i say there is a story behind the story.
    peter abraham and i exchanged many emails about the behind the scenes stuff the yankees were doing with wang.

    reporters do not write about everything they know. it was common knowledge that the yankees were not happy with wang throwing so many sinkers. the problem that they had was only one guy really understood the sinker that wang threw and it was neil allen and cashman fired him.

    luckily guidry was a close friend of guess who so let’s just say he kept coaching wang much longer than cashman thought. wang himself did not understand how he threw the sinker, so he need constant tuning up and reminding of what he was told in the first place that made the ball sink.

    part of the deal was of course the grip, but the thing that wang couldn’t hold onto was that he had to shirten his strde to make the ball sink- almost a slide step. this took a few miles an hour off his fastball but created the sink. wang could not feel when he was lengthening his stride, so he had to be constant reminded to shorten it.

    when the yankees were wanting him to throw other pitches, more four seam fastballs, and more sliders, wang would gravitate back to his old long stride which would hurt the sinker. wang could have thrown a four seamer and a slider off the shorter stride and this would have been better, but he like any athlete had muscle memory on these pitches that made him lengten his stride to what it was his whole life.

    the problem was the sinker depended on the shorter stride that allen taught him.

    now i have no idea what his new pitching coach is teaching him with the sinker. i know the guy who is a part time official scorer for the nats and orioles, and he asked the present pitching last summer if he’s talked to allen about wang and he said no.

    he also said he didn’t think the stride was a factor. i did read that the pitching coach was encouraging wang ti throw the sinker as much as possible which should help.

    this is not what the yankees were telling wang. they wanted him to mix in other pitches more.

    wang is a product of people outside him. had he never met neil allen , he most likely would have never had a sinker ball . i do not know if they have any contact now as i haven’t talked with neil in two years.

    i kind of doubt it because of allen’s high profile rays triple a pitching coach job.

  53. Shame Spencer March 15th, 2012 at 11:05 am

    “The Yankees got 56 innings out of Noesi of a 4.5 ERA but he was pitching in mostly blow outs. Useful? Arguably. The right role for a guy that is pegged as a major league starter? Probably not.”

    Yep.

    Hopefully this is moot and they just let Phelps start in AAA until late in the season.

  54. BIG AL March 15th, 2012 at 11:05 am

    Some folks here either have blinders on, or their vision of our “Propects” is not in line with reality.

    The “B’s” will not be ready for at least another season, their control has been, and continues to be a concern.

    Mitchell and Warren are far more ready for a roll in NY, as of now.

    Its time to stop believing all the hype, and simply open your eyes to the fact that the FO already knows, (thus the trade for Pineda), our prospects are simply that, prospects, and not ready for the show.

    I’m more concerned with how our OF and IF prospects are coming along than our pitching at this point in time.

    But, what do I know. :)

  55. Jerkface March 15th, 2012 at 11:07 am

    One way or another, Yankees pitcher Hector Noesi will be a starter next season even if he has to start the season in the minor leagues, according to Chad Jennings of the Journal News.
    “I have no intention of Noesi doing (using Noesi as a reliever) again,” Brian Cashman told Jennings. “I just think Noesi is a starter, so one way or another, that’s where he needs to be. I don’t want to waste his time as a long man if we can avoid it.”

    “Send Phelps to the pen!” If they want to turn someone into a reliever, go ahead with DJ Mitchell since so many have him pegged for that role anyways.

  56. Jerkface March 15th, 2012 at 11:09 am

    The Yankees used 9 starters last year. Let Phelps get some of those starts. You put him in the pen and then the time comes for a spot start and ‘phelps isn’t stretched out so we’ve signed Sergio Mitre to make this start’. Happened with Noesi (Not the sidney ponson stuff, but he missed out on spot starts). Happened with Hughes as well.

  57. stuckey March 15th, 2012 at 11:10 am

    One can see a shift in the perception of Phelps already taking hold based on the last 2 weeks.

    I think he’d always been regarded as being potentially rotation-worthy (even if, before the last few days, that was back of the rotation), but I think some are now looking at him through a new lense.

    Phelps, unless I’m off base, was regarded prior to this spring as a depth-type pitcher in the Yankees system – a guy with limited stuff but excellent command and smarts that could be a useful ML pitcher somewhere, probably MORE useful in systems other than the yankees’.

    In the Yankees system, that sort of pitcher often profiles to the bullpen. Not sure I agree with this perception that the long-man in the bullpen can’t be manned by a younger player. That is what depth is for – quality at the ML level.

    Like I say, I’m getting the inkling this morning’s debate is at least partly due to people maybe reconsidering Phelp’s ceiling, which, unless I miss the point of the article that started it, the Yankees might be doing as well.

  58. randy l. March 15th, 2012 at 11:11 am

    “I’m against the yo-yo process too.”

    me too, but i want to be on record that this doesn’t mean i don’t like yo-yo ma.

  59. trisha - true pinstriped blue March 15th, 2012 at 11:11 am

    Big Al – TOTALLY agree with your post.

    The problem on this forum is that a lot of the posters get to be like excited puppies when it comes to prospects they like and they virtually demand that the kids get to the big show, probably so they can see them.

    Sadly, if the kids don’t perform according to their expectations, they are ready to throw them out like yesterday’s trash.*

    Loyalty doesn’t seem to be a huge factor with the “hungrier” fans here, though I guess you can see how that would go hand-in-hand.

    If Yankee history has taught us anything it should be that you do NOT bring a prospect up until that prospect has had ample time down below to develop what he needs to develop.

    * – Mark Melancon is an example.

  60. stuckey March 15th, 2012 at 11:13 am

    “And how does this help the 2013 Yankees? I thought this organization had a long term plan lol, that’s what everyone keeps telling me.”

    Doesn’t 2012 count too?

  61. trisha - true pinstriped blue March 15th, 2012 at 11:13 am

    I’ve seen Yo Yo Ma peform and I’ve met him. That was before he really got big.

  62. Jerkface March 15th, 2012 at 11:16 am

    Stuckey,

    I’ve been on Phelps & Warren as potential quality pitchers since last year, hence my aversion to the pineda deal. This debate is more about the right use of prospects. Nova and Noesi were both ‘depth-type’ pitchers. One was given ~40 innings in a nice way while maintaining a starter regimen. The other was ‘wasted’ and had to have Cashman proclaiming no more BS for him. Then he got traded (which is also an acceptable use of these types of pitchers).

    Bullpen pitchers should be failed starters, or guys that lack true quality MLB starter upside. Right now Phelps has pretty good upside, and has for a while. He has been very good at every level. Relievers are worth less, they perform less. If the Yankees spot started Phelps, or made him a long man that actually got innings (4+ innings every 5 days? Atleast then he’d provide around 120 innings) it would be nice.

    But pitching in blow outs and not getting enough reps to work with isn’t good.

  63. Jerkface March 15th, 2012 at 11:17 am

    The problem on this forum is that a lot of the posters get to be like excited puppies when it comes to prospects they like and they virtually demand that the kids get to the big show, probably so they can see them.

    Sadly, if the kids don’t perform according to their expectations, they are ready to throw them out like yesterday’s trash.*

    Huge lohud fallacy. Who here threw any prospect out in the trash that they were eager to see after a little bit of adversity?

  64. Jerkface March 15th, 2012 at 11:19 am

    I really want to meet the invisible sect of LOHUD patrons that is constantly cited as ready to stick the dagger in the back of anyone they want to see play.

  65. MTU March 15th, 2012 at 11:20 am

    Trisha-

    Making sure a young player is fully prepared for their role in the bigs is best possible thing.

    In the past that has not always been the case.

    Like I’ve said earlier I like to think the Yankees have learned from their mistakes and are on the path to doing better in that regard.

    If I am to trust that hypothesis I have to watch to see how they handle things from here on out.

    There is some evidence to suggest that the change has been successfully accomplished.

    I hope that’s the case. Anything else would be a total waste.

    The Yankees have made a huge bet on their young Pitching.

    Part of that is developing it correctly from here on out.

  66. MTU March 15th, 2012 at 11:21 am

    Good morning Al.

  67. J. Alfred Prufrock March 15th, 2012 at 11:24 am

    We don’t know what they would have done on Pineda. They were after Felix. I may not agree, but I get that. He’s close to a sure thing, young, and although not cheap, they can afford him if they want.
    ///

    Yea, I also get the conventional ‘wisdom’ that you ‘of course’ just drop your pants for Hernandez, but I don’t agree at all – not if it was going to cost Montero/Banuelos/Betances, and perhaps even then some.

    What I understand is that it mollifes the John Harpers and Bill Maddens of the world, as well as that mainstream fan who has been screaming for two years about ‘getting King Felix’ into pinstripes and all will be well, but who also has zero curiosity about just who’s kicking around in our own system.

    The Yankees know they would have had universal carte blanche on that one, and yet, it would have been a big risk to give up all that for a pitcher who could blow his arm out, having already averaged about 216 innings per year over the last six seasons. I know I am in an extreme minority, but at least Pineda’s virtually mileage free. Now, he may be more fragile, but if he doesn’t wind up on the DL, it’s fair to assume his best years – whatever that may mean for him – are ahead of him. Even though the King is just 26 in April, I don’t think we can make the same assumption.

    Of course, I was not in favor of the trade, since we are loaded with pitching at AAA and in the rotation; just saying I was never in favor of trading Montero for a pitcher (not Felix or even Kershaw, though the latter would make greater sense, given the ballpark), but that at least Pineda is a fresh arm with upside. The idea that we should have just automatically given up TWO fresh arms with elite upside, PLUS Montero, for Felix, to me is beyond ridiculous; but it would have been gotten a virtual 100 percent approval rate from all corners.

    This is why when folks use others’ endorsement of the actual trade that occurred as some kind of leverage to “prove” it was some kind of no-brainer, genius move, I am, well, unmoved.

  68. blake March 15th, 2012 at 11:25 am

    “One can see a shift in the perception of Phelps already taking hold based on the last 2 weeks”

    I’ve always thought he was pretty good….look it up if you want ;)

  69. Shame Spencer March 15th, 2012 at 11:25 am

    stuckey March 15th, 2012 at 11:13 am

    “And how does this help the 2013 Yankees? I thought this organization had a long term plan lol, that’s what everyone keeps telling me.”

    Doesn’t 2012 count too?
    ——————————–

    Of course… but we have 6 starters already in the majors. Why would we want to mess with a guy we might need next season in Phelps/Warren/Mitchell by limiting their innings in a mop up pen role like we did with Noesi? There’s a possibility we don’t resign Garcia and/or KURODA, right? So…. we’ll likely still be on the hunt for a starter next off season as well. It’d be nice to have some solid in house options that are prepared for 150-200 innings of work, IMO.

  70. Jerkface March 15th, 2012 at 11:26 am

    The shift in perception is in the media. So now he is getting some dap from scouts and the press, so the Yankees of course want to put him in the pen :twisted:

  71. J. Alfred Prufrock March 15th, 2012 at 11:28 am

    *I should add, two fresh arms with elite upside who are already in AAA.

  72. blake March 15th, 2012 at 11:28 am

    A trade for Felix Hernandez would have totally be against everything the Yanks say they are trying to do right now…..it would have gutted the system AND added 20 million to the payroll……totally against the 189 mantra.

  73. randy l. March 15th, 2012 at 11:32 am

    “Good morning Al.”

    F U AL :)

    … i hadn’t had a chance to get back to you after one of your last posts .

  74. pat March 15th, 2012 at 11:32 am

    “Who here threw any prospect out in the trash that they were eager to see after a little bit of adversity?”

    The IPK fan club thinned dramatically after a few bad games. Even his postgame interviews were scrutinized.

  75. stuckey March 15th, 2012 at 11:34 am

    “Why would we want to mess with a guy we might need next season in Phelps/Warren/Mitchell by limiting their innings in a mop up pen role like we did with Noesi?”

    Shame, I’m fairly certain one of the major philosophical divides on this issue is whether or not pitching on the ML team, under the guidance of the ML pitching coach, gaining experience pitching to ML pitchers, constitutes “messing” with him.

    People have valid questions about innings as it pertains to innings limits year-to-year, but I’ve yet to see any conclusive evidence to suggest ML bullpen work is detrimental to “development”.

    It seems we have a lot of opinions on the matter (which is fine) but not a lot of answers on the topic.

  76. Jerkface March 15th, 2012 at 11:35 am

    The IPK fan club thinned dramatically after a few bad games. Even his postgame interviews were scrutinized.

    Yea but is anyone like that here now? If the comment is made as part of this discussion, it seems aimed at the posters having it.

  77. BIG AL March 15th, 2012 at 11:36 am

    MTU -

    Good morning. Got to run out soon, but, just wanted to drop my 2 cents, so to speak.

    JF -

    Joba is an example of a prospect fans were all too ready to flush down the drain, and to some extent Hughes falls into that same category.

    Later folks, got to run, y’all have a very nice day.

  78. Shame Spencer March 15th, 2012 at 11:38 am

    I really want to meet the invisible sect of LOHUD patrons that is constantly cited as ready to stick the dagger in the back of anyone they want to see play.
    ———————–

    :lol:

  79. GreenBeret7 March 15th, 2012 at 11:38 am

    MTU March 15th, 2012 at 10:56 am
    The Yankees have made a fairly substantial bet on their young Pitching.

    If they fail to develop it well from here on out they are simply dumber than dog snot.

    They may have made some mistakes in the past but I have to believe they are no longer that dumb.

    Prove me right Cashman.

    ————————————————————————————————————————-

    Cashman’s only real mistake in dealing with pitching was not making sure that wang was healthy and strong before restarting him a couple of years ago. He made the same mistake with Hughes last year. Hughes should have started the season on the DL, not in the rotation. Hughes problem was the 90 innings increase from 2009 to 2010.

  80. BIG AL March 15th, 2012 at 11:38 am

    randy l. -

    Is there a problem where you can give it, but can’t take it?

    For an old man, which I admit I am, it might be time for you to grow up. :)

  81. Jerkface March 15th, 2012 at 11:39 am

    If we’re just talking about ‘fans’ as in any new york fan anywhere I don’t know why you bother. LOHUD isn’t every fan everywhere, we’re individual people that have pretty clear opinions based on a history of posting. So there isn’t really a need to keep making these LOHUD fallacies that confuse 1 group with the other.

  82. J. Alfred Prufrock March 15th, 2012 at 11:42 am

    Jerkface March 15th, 2012 at 11:17 am
    The problem on this forum is that a lot of the posters get to be like excited puppies when it comes to prospects they like and they virtually demand that the kids get to the big show, probably so they can see them.

    Sadly, if the kids don’t perform according to their expectations, they are ready to throw them out like yesterday’s trash.*

    Huge lohud fallacy. Who here threw any prospect out in the trash that they were eager to see after a little bit of adversity?
    ///

    I’m out the door, but I’m curious, too, who these mysterious posters might be. Who, indeed?

  83. stuckey March 15th, 2012 at 11:43 am

    “This is why when folks use others’ endorsement of the actual trade that occurred as some kind of leverage to “prove” it was some kind of no-brainer, genius move, I am, well, unmoved.”

    I’m not sure anyone has.

    The point about reception of the trade is sometimes cited in response to the unequivocal assertion that Montero is destined to be a great ML bat almost without fail, and that anyone who doesn’t see this is idiot.

    The point being made is simply that yours is in fact a minority position. It just provides context and prospective. Nothing more.

    I don’t believe anyone has proclaimed it a “genuis” move. The only camp taking an extreme conclusive position before either players suits up for their new team is yours.

    Being an understandable transaction and being a genius one are two entirely different scenarios, the latter being one almost entirely of your invention.

    That you invented it, continue to present it as representing anyone’s position simply because it’s the one you prefer to debate against, and continually ignore repeated statements that the trade CAN certainly NOT work out in the Yankees favor is very, very telling.

  84. randy l. March 15th, 2012 at 11:44 am

    “Is there a problem where you can give it, but can’t take it?”

    nah, you’re just a a hole who’s a back stabber type.

  85. CompassRosy March 15th, 2012 at 11:44 am

    MTU says:
    March 15, 2012 at 10:11 am
    ::::Rosy-

    If you’re out there.

    I think you’re gonna find that Noesi is way better than a #5 starter in your rotation.

    JMO.:::

    Hi MTU ~
    Ah, I think you may be referring to my 2013 rotation projection (I don’t normally project, it was in response to Stoneburner). Anyhoo…. I agree that Noesi will likely be higher than a number 5 this season (for as long as he holds out) but, if any of the big three (or now, big four) make it, he’ll likely move toward the back.

  86. Shame Spencer March 15th, 2012 at 11:45 am

    People have valid questions about innings as it pertains to innings limits year-to-year, but I’ve yet to see any conclusive evidence to suggest ML bullpen work is detrimental to “development”.

    ———————–

    Does Phil Hughes count?

    I’m being a bit facetious of course, but I’m sure some of the smarter people on the forum could at least present pretty significant evidence that a jump in innings from season A to B can be detrimental to a pitcher.

    I get the idea that there are intangibles guys learn by being with the big club. And that’s where I’d like to see all of our AAA guys. But having any of those guys in AAA pitch the innings they had Noesi pitch last season (blow outs, no pressure, usually one inning of work at a time, etc) just doesn’t strike me as a proper development plan.

    They want to be under $189, right? They better make sure they get two of those guys in AAA to hit. So again, based on that logic (the Yankees plan), why would it be beneficial to have any of them get 56 meaningless innings in the majors? Now if you want them to get 56 innings at the end of the year, after they’ve already been starting for most of the season until lets say around August, that’s a totally different scenario. You’re still letting them get the bulk of their work in before having them get all that ‘intangible’ experience of being with the big club without sacrificing their development.

  87. Jerkface March 15th, 2012 at 11:45 am

    nah, you’re just a a hole who’s a back stabber type.

    Caesar you ain’t.

  88. stuckey March 15th, 2012 at 11:47 am

    I’m out the door, but I’m curious, too, who these mysterious posters might be. Who, indeed?

    ////

    Who has proclaimed the trade a “no-brainer, genius” move?

    Who, indeed?

  89. MTU March 15th, 2012 at 11:48 am

    Rosy-

    I think you are underestimating Noesi a bit.

    He is very good.

    In that large park of yours he might be even better.

    Think you might be in a for a pleasant surprise.

    He’s used to pitching against much tougher competition too.

    :)

  90. randy l. March 15th, 2012 at 11:49 am

    “Caesar you ain’t.”

    no school today?

  91. stuckey March 15th, 2012 at 11:52 am

    “Does Phil Hughes count?”

    Anecdotally, sure.

    “but I’m sure some of the smarter people on the forum could at least present pretty significant evidence that a jump in innings from season A to B can be detrimental to a pitcher. ”

    I understood the more common wisdom to be it was more of a matter of a one season jump in regards to CAREER highs, and not so much season-to-season, but I may be mistaken.

    “why would it be beneficial to have any of them get 56 meaningless innings in the majors? You’re still letting them get the bulk of their work in before having them get all that ‘intangible’ experience of being with the big club without sacrificing their development.”

    All we’re doing is restating the premise Shame. Whether or not there is any sacrifice is still the outstanding question.

  92. trisha - true pinstriped blue March 15th, 2012 at 11:52 am

    “Huge lohud fallacy. Who here threw any prospect out in the trash that they were eager to see after a little bit of adversity?”

    You want names? You want me to research lohud and name names? I will.

    I was talking to Al, by the way, about posters b*tching about getting players up and then kicking them in the face when they don’t perform. It was a general comment, though if you’re getting defensive about it, you may have been one of them? I don’t know. But there were a slew of posters who flipped out like nutcases about getting Melancon up and then discarded him like trash when he didn’t perform to their liking.

    ********

    About IPK – I was definitely one who couldn’t get him away from the Yankees quickly enough – but I never lobbied for him to come up to the big game. After 5 losses in a row, I had seen enough.

  93. Jerkface March 15th, 2012 at 11:53 am

    no school today?

    Well now that you’re here school is in session, Randy! You’re going to get schooled. School.

  94. trisha - true pinstriped blue March 15th, 2012 at 11:54 am

    MTU – absolutely agree on developing the kids. I hope they find a way to do it.

    ********

    Going to make a sick call. I have the DVR going in case I’m not back in time for the game.

    Anything posted to me will be responded to, if a response is necessary, when I return.

  95. dogface March 15th, 2012 at 11:55 am

    nah, you’re just a a hole who’s a back stabber type.

    =========================

    Who talks like this?

    It should be “…just AN a hole…”

  96. randy l. March 15th, 2012 at 11:55 am

    let’s meet at some baseball field so you can teach me what you know.

  97. Jerkface March 15th, 2012 at 11:55 am

    About IPK – I was definitely one who couldn’t get him away from the Yankees quickly enough – but I never lobbied for him to come up to the big game. After 5 losses in a row, I had seen enough.

    Interesting, so perhaps you’re just thinking about similar posters such as yourself, rather than people that are actually looking forward to prospects who do this pretend 180 to then hate them. Because I’ve seen no compelling evidence that the latter exists. But this is the reason the lohud fallacy was created, because people keep confusing the first group with the second.

    Chances are, the people that were kicking Melancon when he was down were not cheering for him to get a shot in the first place. I know you won’t find me in there, which is why I always bring it up (would seem weird to call you out if there was a likelihood that I would be one of the people you’d cite). I defended Melancon like crazy.

  98. randy l. March 15th, 2012 at 11:57 am

    “Who talks like this?”

    someone who likes to be straight with people.

    it cuts out the BS.

  99. Jerkface March 15th, 2012 at 11:59 am

    it cuts out the BS.

    Too bad its then pasted right into your mouth.

  100. randy l. March 15th, 2012 at 12:00 pm

    “It should be “…just AN a hole…”

    oh, i see.

    “a” vs “an”

    you’re smart.

    you’ll figure it out :)

  101. stuckey March 15th, 2012 at 12:00 pm

    “someone who likes to be straight with people.”

    Randy, how can we tell when you’re being straight with people and when you’re just being an acknowdged troll to get a reaction.

    Because you seem to want to reserve the right to switch positions based on how badly you get beat down?

    What’s the point of being straight if we can never tell if you’re actually being straight?

  102. randy l. March 15th, 2012 at 12:01 pm

    “Too bad its then pasted right into your mouth.”

    what was the address of that field you wanted to teach some baseball at?

  103. Shame Spencer March 15th, 2012 at 12:02 pm

    “You want me to research lohud and name names? I will.”

    ———————

    :lol:

    Great line, trish!

  104. Jerkface March 15th, 2012 at 12:03 pm

    what was the address of that field you wanted to teach some baseball at?

    The same one where you want Stuckey to throw a baseball at your head. Its clear, having nothing left to fall back on, you desperately want to prove your athleticism to everyone. Its pretty funny.

  105. Shame Spencer March 15th, 2012 at 12:05 pm

    stuckey – I’d rather you respond to my last paragraph… it seems like Phelps/Warren/Mitchell should be able to get 56 innings in the majors without sacrificing any development. Why not take that route? Again.. if the Yankees have a plan then I don’t see a logic jump in assuming 2013 and 2014 should matter just as much as 2012.

  106. randy l. March 15th, 2012 at 12:07 pm

    “Randy, how can we tell when you’re being straight with people…?”

    i’ll talk to you because you’re consistently negative. no pretenses there.

    you’re misguided about a baseball because you haven’t spent enough of your time on a baseball field but that’s neither here nor there.

    i prefer enemies to come right out and be honest about it.

    they’re just simply on the other team.

    the fake “hi y’all ” is weak.

    you’re a nice direct know -it- all- pain -in- the- a, but very honest about it.
    no problem there.

  107. randy l. March 15th, 2012 at 12:08 pm

    oh damn, there’s that “a” problem again.
    too bad i didn’t care enough to be more careful :)

  108. Shame Spencer March 15th, 2012 at 12:09 pm

    I liked randy’s post about Neil Allen….

    Where’s Erin? We need a gossip break..

  109. pat March 15th, 2012 at 12:09 pm

    “Yea but is anyone like that here now? If the comment is made as part of this discussion, it seems aimed at the posters having it.”

    I don’t keep score of who is right or wrong here so I don’t know who bailed on IPK.

  110. randy l. March 15th, 2012 at 12:09 pm

    “The same one where you want Stuckey to throw a baseball at your head. Its clear, having nothing left to fall back on, you desperately want to prove your athleticism to everyone.”

    jerkface and stuckey on a baseball field.

    now we’re talking :)

  111. RadioKev March 15th, 2012 at 12:10 pm

    When your minor league guys succeed on the big league level, their value increases. This applies to their work in the bull pen as well.

    If any of our young arms can make our team better, and it doesn’t adversely affect their growth, then it’s a no-brainer to get them involved. Look at Noesi – he had enough value to land us a legitimate high upside prospect. That probably wouldn’t have happened if he hadn’t been our long man.

    I’m thinking Mitchell makes the most sense for that role, if not Garcia.

  112. Jerkface March 15th, 2012 at 12:11 pm

    I don’t keep score of who is right or wrong here so I don’t know who bailed on IPK.

    If you’re not keeping track then you probably should not try to tell everyone the score. Which is the point. The LOHUD fallacy is a long standing tradition of confusing those who you are talking to right now with a different group of people from back in the past.

    “Everyone is talking about David Phelps? Well they probably stabbed IPK in the back… after liking him a whole lot just like David Phelps!”

    Its never true.

  113. Jerkface March 15th, 2012 at 12:13 pm

    If any of our young arms can make our team better, and it doesn’t adversely affect their growth, then it’s a no-brainer to get them involved. Look at Noesi – he had enough value to land us a legitimate high upside prospect. That probably wouldn’t have happened if he hadn’t been our long man.

    This is where the opinions diverge. Noesi has had a history of very good minor league success. From 2008 to 2010 he was a very good minor league starter. I don’t think his 1.5 WHIP or above average ERA (in the bullpen where it was even worse against average) had much to do with the Mariners liking him. It was probably his incredible minor league K:BB and other things.

    Is success in the majors simply not failing too hard?

  114. Jerkface March 15th, 2012 at 12:15 pm

    Arodys Vizcaino off to Dr. Andrews, the fragility of young pitching

  115. RadioKev March 15th, 2012 at 12:16 pm

    I’m honestly surprised people are still hung up on Kennedy. Really? Don’t we all agree he wouldn’t be this successful in the AL East? And if Granderson puts up a couple more years like 2011, it’ll all be well worth it?

    We’ve got one of the star players in baseball in a premium position. That’s the most Kennedy ever did for us, and that’s fine. We created value, and traded that value. It’s going to happen again with this new crop.

  116. randy l. March 15th, 2012 at 12:16 pm

    shame spencer-

    people spend so much time attacking each other that a lot of stuff that has value gets lost in the “i don’t like you” BS.

    i really think that’s why we don’t see many sj44 or CB type posters coming on here.

    i saw someone attacking yankeefeminista the other night because she actually was using her own eyes from watching players at games to make a judgement of the players.

    for some reason some people get very upset with people who get close to the action. i don’t know if it’s jealousy or what, but it’s a weird response.

  117. blake March 15th, 2012 at 12:17 pm

    “Look at Noesi – he had enough value to land us a legitimate high upside prospect. That probably wouldn’t have happened if he hadn’t been our long man.”

    I don’t necessarily think him being a long man had anything to do with his trade value….I think his minor league track record and the fact that he was throwing 98 in winter ball was more of a factor…..but even if that’s true…..I still don’t like messing with a guys development and burning a year of service time to put them in an important role in the big leagues…..if you need the guy to throw important innings then fine….but its a waste to make then a mop up guy IMO

  118. stuckey March 15th, 2012 at 12:17 pm

    “Arodys Vizcaino off to Dr. Andrews, the fragility of young pitching”

    Hence, the need to stockpile it.

  119. GreenBeret7 March 15th, 2012 at 12:18 pm

    The problem with innings jump isn’t pitching only 80 innings one year and jumping to starter the next like Noesi would do. It’s going from not pitching over a hundred innings for four year to 170 like Hughes did at the age he was. It’s not like a 30 year old pitcher such as CJ Wilson. That’s where the issues are.

  120. MTU March 15th, 2012 at 12:18 pm

    Kev-

    “We created value, and traded that value. It’s going to happen again with this new crop.”

    It’s inevitable.

    We can’t keep ‘em all. Just no room.

  121. blake March 15th, 2012 at 12:19 pm

    “Arodys Vizcaino off to Dr. Andrews, the fragility of young pitching”

    Probably why the Braves have kept him in the pen….

  122. RadioKev March 15th, 2012 at 12:19 pm

    This is where the opinions diverge. Noesi has had a history of very good minor league success. From 2008 to 2010 he was a very good minor league starter. I don’t think his 1.5 WHIP or above average ERA (in the bullpen where it was even worse against average) had much to do with the Mariners liking him. It was probably his incredible minor league K:BB and other things.

    Is success in the majors simply not failing too hard?
    ——–

    Jerkface,

    Sure, I’ll agree with that. But I’d bet playing in the bigs put Noesi on people’s radars. You could see the guy with your own eyes. I’m not saying that changes his results, but I think there’s a psychological effect.

  123. stuckey March 15th, 2012 at 12:21 pm

    “stuckey – I’d rather you respond to my last paragraph… it seems like Phelps/Warren/Mitchell should be able to get 56 innings in the majors without sacrificing any development. Why not take that route? Again.. if the Yankees have a plan then I don’t see a logic jump in assuming 2013 and 2014 should matter just as much as 2012.”

    Shame, how are three starting pitchers getting over 150 innings combined (assuming you meant that).

    Even one getting 55-60 innings is no lock if there isn’t a significant injury (remember, the Yanks are 6 deep at the ML level) and assuming maybe the Yanks could be in a fight into and perhaps through September for the division crown?

    Which starter are you shutting down if none are injured?

  124. GreenBeret7 March 15th, 2012 at 12:22 pm

    pat March 15th, 2012 at 12:09 pm
    “Yea but is anyone like that here now? If the comment is made as part of this discussion, it seems aimed at the posters having it.”

    I don’t keep score of who is right or wrong here so I don’t know who bailed on IPK.

    ————————————————————————————————————————-

    pat, they’re the same ones that want hughes dumped for anything they can get.

  125. blake March 15th, 2012 at 12:22 pm

    Sure, I’ll agree with that. But I’d bet playing in the bigs put Noesi on people’s radars. You could see the guy with your own eyes. I’m not saying that changes his results, but I think there’s a psychological effect.”

    I can’t argue with that…..my issue is the reasoning for doing it though…..did the Yankees use Noesi last year to showcase him to other teams? Or did they just want him in the bullpen for some reason?

  126. dogface March 15th, 2012 at 12:22 pm

    Don’t we all agree he wouldn’t be this successful in the AL East?

    ===============================

    Do we? By extension, should we also assume Kuroda won’t be successful in the AL East?

  127. MTU March 15th, 2012 at 12:24 pm

    Teams who wish to further establish the value of their young players sometimes “showcase” them at the ML level.

    It’s hard to know exactly when they are doing that but it definitely takes place.

    Some prospects are for keeping. Some are for trading.

    Just the way it is.

  128. stuckey March 15th, 2012 at 12:28 pm

    Randy, I’m not going to pretend I understood 80% of your response (the “hi y’all” thing is particularly indecipherable), but this I think I get.

    “you’re misguided about a baseball because you haven’t spent enough of your time on a baseball field but that’s neither here nor there.”

    It’s here and there.

    You don’t know anyone’s experience on a baseball field, other than your sound guess that yours extends level’s higher than most here.

    But I’ll ask again, if your experience by default puts you on a plateau that overcomes your rather limited critical thinking skills, what is your point of being here?

    Are you acknowledging you’re here just to remind people daily that your experience a lifetime ago gives you a free pass on saying really, really dumb things?

    I’m failing to see the point or appeal of that..?

  129. RadioKev March 15th, 2012 at 12:28 pm

    Or did they just want him in the bullpen for some reason?
    ——-

    The Yankees have a surplus of pitching and they have to choose how to use those resources. They wanted a quality long man like Aceves. A “mop up” man is a pretty negative out look on the role – If I’m a manager, I’d want all my guys to go out there and be able to throw quality innings.

  130. pat March 15th, 2012 at 12:29 pm

    “Don’t we all agree he wouldn’t be this successful in the AL East?”

    Just my opinion but I think the NY media freaks out players more than the competition of the AL East.

  131. Jerkface March 15th, 2012 at 12:33 pm

    The Yankees have a surplus of pitching and they have to choose how to use those resources. They wanted a quality long man like Aceves. A “mop up” man is a pretty negative out look on the role – If I’m a manager, I’d want all my guys to go out there and be able to throw quality innings.

    They may have wanted an Aceves, but they didn’t use him like one. Aceves didn’t get all the wins he did out of the pen by pitching in blowouts.

  132. blake March 15th, 2012 at 12:36 pm

    “They wanted a quality long man like Aceves. A “mop up” man is a pretty negative out look on the role – If I’m a manager, I’d want all my guys to go out there and be able to throw quality innings.”

    How they used Noesi last year wasn’t really similar at all to how Aceves was used in 2009. Aceves threw lots of high leverage innings that season and with Boston last year…..Noesi didn’t throw hardly any innings that mattered at all…..I remember one extra inning game against the Orioles maybe where he made a difference……aside from that he was on mop up duty for the most part

  133. Jerkface March 15th, 2012 at 12:36 pm

    There are a certain portion of innings that should be doled out: Starting, closing, relief pitching in close games, medium leverage games, low leverage.

    I think low leverage (blowouts and otherwise) is a waste for quality guys like Phelps and Noesi if thats all they are going to get for an entire year. The Yankees spent a year of service time for a potentially good starter pitching him in blow outs.

    They could have got the same effect in a 4th of the time by using him in one of the spot starts, but they couldn’t because he was stuck in the pen. Thus a guy like Gordon gets signed off the phillies to make 2 starts.

  134. GreenBeret7 March 15th, 2012 at 12:36 pm

    MTU, NYYs have three pitchers made for deciding which to trade and which to keep. Right now, DJ Mitchell is the best one for the spot starter/long relief for NYYs. Phelps is like Nova. a little less stuff than Warren. Just like Nova has a little less stuff than Noesi. The difference is that both Phelps and Nova had had to learn everything they can. Not saying that Noesi and Warren are lazy, but, they have the better stuff and not quite the need to work as hard to learn more. If one of the Warren/Phelps/Mitchell is traded, Warren had the biggest name and best stuff coming out of college. He’s the one that gets traded.

  135. Jerkface March 15th, 2012 at 12:36 pm

    I remember one extra inning game against the Orioles maybe where he made a difference

    Pretty sure that was his debut!

  136. RadioKev March 15th, 2012 at 12:37 pm

    pat March 15th, 2012 at 12:29 pm
    “Don’t we all agree he wouldn’t be this successful in the AL East?”

    Just my opinion but I think the NY media freaks out players more than the competition of the AL East.
    ———–

    Yeah, I’m not saying Kennedy didn’t have the make up to play here, I just think his results wouldn’t be AS impressive in the AL East. I just can’t see him pitching to a sub 3 ERA in this division.

  137. blake March 15th, 2012 at 12:39 pm

    Again my point is about what you’re using the prospect for….if you need them for a real role…..one that’s going to help you win games then fine……I just don’t like sticking them out there to pitch 60 innings in mostly already decided game situations…….you can sign Mitre to do that…..

  138. MG March 15th, 2012 at 12:40 pm

    I’ve only seen Phelps 1X (a couple of innings against the Sox the other night) but was very impressed-he’s got good stuff, threw harder than I expected, and has good command of both his fastball and breaking ball.

    He reminded me of Mike Mussina to some degree although I doubt he has the same level of ability.

    The Yankees are in a good position with their young pitching, hopefully they continue to nurture them and turn as many as possible into major league starters, either with the Yankees or with another team after a trade that brings the Yankees positional players that can contribute.

  139. pat March 15th, 2012 at 12:41 pm

    MLBNetwork: Watch LIVE at 1pm ET as Michael Pineda and the @Yankees face the @Nationals. This game is available in Yankees territory.

  140. blake March 15th, 2012 at 12:43 pm

    “Yeah, I’m not saying Kennedy didn’t have the make up to play here, I just think his results wouldn’t be AS impressive in the AL East. I just can’t see him pitching to a sub 3 ERA in this division.”

    Nah…he wouldn’t….but the team he played for would score more runs as well…..there are more runs scored in the AL in general so while a pitchers numbers may be worse…..it doesn’t necessarily mean they will pitch worse relative to the run scoring environment.

  141. MTU March 15th, 2012 at 12:44 pm

    GB-

    Thanks for your take.

  142. RadioKev March 15th, 2012 at 12:46 pm

    Maybe my memory is just hazy on Noesi. The results of the games he appeared are 15-15. It’s hard to say he was MOSTLY low leverage with those results.

    In either case, I’m fine with the principle. You’ve got to pick and choose what you do with your resources. Noesi vs Mitre in the pen? I’d take Noesi, personally.

  143. Shame Spencer March 15th, 2012 at 12:47 pm

    “Shame, how are three starting pitchers getting over 150 innings combined (assuming you meant that). ”

    I meant one of the three. Sorry I should have made that more clear, that’s why I put them as Phelps/Warren/Mitchell instead of Phelps, Warren, and Mitchell.

    And to respond to your point, even if there was not an injury to the starting rotation that’s an instance where putting young arms in the bullpen makes sense to me. In situations late in the season where they have already pitched over 100 innings at least as a starter. Then, you can give them a taste of the bigs without jeopardizing their development for the following season.

    It was also pointed out we needed 9 starters last season. The likelihood is that won’t change this year. 162 games is a lot. We’re going to need people to be ready to spot start.

  144. MTU March 15th, 2012 at 12:49 pm

    time to walk the Mops.

    Later.

  145. Shame Spencer March 15th, 2012 at 12:49 pm

    “They could have got the same effect in a 4th of the time by using him in one of the spot starts, but they couldn’t because he was stuck in the pen. Thus a guy like Gordon gets signed off the phillies to make 2 starts.”

    And this won’t work with their plan to be very budget conscious going forward… which should be incentive to leave the AAA guys to develop.

    Phelps/Warren/Mitchell’s innings don’t really matter to me, personally. But they should probably matter to an organization hoping to have a very cheap starting rotation in the near future.

  146. randy l. March 15th, 2012 at 12:49 pm

    “But I’ll ask again, if your experience by default puts you on a plateau that overcomes your rather limited critical thinking skills, what is your point of being here?”

    “Limited critical thinking skills”?

    Actually I do admit a mental flaw in talking about baseball with someone like you.

    There are people on the blog who have played a lot or watched up close a lot.

    There are also more than a few who understand who mantle was as a baseball player
    That alone is worth coming on here

  147. GreenBeret7 March 15th, 2012 at 12:51 pm

    MTU March 15th, 2012 at 12:44 pm
    GB-

    Thanks for your take.

    ————————————————————————————————————————-

    No problem. all three have followed the same path for 3-4 years. Phelps just seems to be more of a thinker on the mound…the sort that can invent on the fly during a game. The “lesser” of the three has a nastier combination of pitches and that’s Mitchell…pretty good fastball that’s getting better, a bowling ball sinker, curve and a very good change-up. Apparently, he’s now learning a cutter. That may be too good to pass up as a reliever, but, still, he’s the best suited for the role (to start innings).

  148. blake March 15th, 2012 at 12:51 pm

    Jon Heyman already has his story ready in case Pineda doesn’t hit 95 on the gun today.

  149. blake March 15th, 2012 at 12:53 pm

    Radio,

    Yea obviously in a vacuum Id rather have Noesi than Mitre….but you’re not developing Mitre or considering his future…..

  150. Jerkface March 15th, 2012 at 12:56 pm

    Maybe my memory is just hazy on Noesi. The results of the games he appeared are 15-15. It’s hard to say he was MOSTLY low leverage with those results.

    The end result win or loss isn’t how leverage is decided. If he only pitched when the yankees were losing or winning by a lot, then he was used in low leverage. And that is the case.

  151. blake March 15th, 2012 at 12:59 pm

    That 15-15 record when Noesi pitched probably indicates that he pitched in equal amounts of blow out wins and blow out losses :)

  152. Duh Innings March 15th, 2012 at 1:00 pm

    Time for Lohud to get rid of comments and create messageboards cuz there’s too much back-and-forth between essentially only 3 to 5 posters.

    A board for each:

    New York Yankees
    Minor League Yankees
    MLB In General
    Rants & Raves

    If posts in R&R exceed posts in NYY, get rid of R&R and clamp down on it in NYY.

  153. Stoneburner March 15th, 2012 at 1:01 pm

    i saw someone attacking yankeefeminista the other night because she actually was using her own eyes from watching players at games to make a judgement of the players.

    for some reason some people get very upset with people who get close to the action. i don’t know if it’s jealousy or what, but it’s a weird response.

    *********

    Naaah – it is the “I am apart of this know it all prospects” club that is thing that is off putting – it is fine if you say you went to games and made some observations – but saying that Jose Ramirez has a plus changeup – when the kid is only in single A – and then acting as if you are the one discovering the prospect b/c no one ever heard of it – it is like a tv show that has a cult following – and then the tv show hits the mainstream (i.e., graduates to the majors) and then the cult followers act as if they have some special entitlement or insight – no – it is just the show moved to a more reasonable time for everyone to watch it and day of the week. . . .

  154. stuckey March 15th, 2012 at 1:02 pm

    “There are people on the blog who have played a lot or watched up close a lot.”

    And you know I’m not among them how?

    “There are also more than a few who understand who mantle was as a baseball player
    That alone is worth coming on here.”

    I think I understand Mantle as much as someone was born after he retired can. Again, I’m sure the AARP has some forums somewhere where you can talk baseball if feeling more comfortable with someone your own age is a factor.

  155. RadioKev March 15th, 2012 at 1:02 pm

    blake March 15th, 2012 at 12:53 pm
    Radio,

    Yea obviously in a vacuum Id rather have Noesi than Mitre….but you’re not developing Mitre or considering his future…..
    ———-

    I know, I guess point is with either choice, you can’t have your cake and eat it too. I’m fine with the Yankees choice.

  156. Jerkface March 15th, 2012 at 1:05 pm

    Why the crusade against Jose Ramirez’s changeup?

  157. RadioKev March 15th, 2012 at 1:07 pm

    The end result win or loss isn’t how leverage is decided. If he only pitched when the yankees were losing or winning by a lot, then he was used in low leverage. And that is the case.
    ————-

    Jerkface, how is that the case? I’m looking at the innings he pitched, and it seems like he was used in plenty of situations? I’m not a baseball reference pro so maybe I’m missing something, but I don’t see where you’re coming from.

    My point is, you’re painting a very black and white picture here…which isn’t the case.

  158. Jerkface March 15th, 2012 at 1:07 pm

    Stoneburners inquisition on opinions is bordering on crazy.

  159. RadioKev March 15th, 2012 at 1:10 pm

    OK, I’ll count through – hell, why not?

    Six of the wins we he pitched in were won by 5 or more Runs. Nine of the wins he pitched in were won by less than 5 Runs.

    Six of the losses he pitched in were lost by 5 or more Runs. Nine of the losses he pitched in were lost by less than 5 Runs.

  160. Bret The Hitman March 15th, 2012 at 1:13 pm

    I was asked to slow dance with a beautiful Southern Belle last night, 21, sweet and CUTE!

    Eat your heart out NYC

    YESSSS!!!!!

  161. Jerkface March 15th, 2012 at 1:14 pm

    Jerkface, how is that the case? I’m looking at the innings he pitched, and it seems like he was used in plenty of situations? I’m not a baseball reference pro so maybe I’m missing something, but I don’t see where you’re coming from.

    His average leverage index is .82. 1 is average. Below 1 is ‘low pressure’ above 1 is high pressure.

    He made 28 relief appearances. Here is when he entered the game

    Tied: 3
    Within 1: 6 (half trailing)
    Within 2: 3 (2 trailing)
    Within 3: 3 (all trailing)
    Within 4: 2
    Within 5: 5
    Greater than 5: 6

  162. Jerkface March 15th, 2012 at 1:15 pm

    All the games he entered when it was tied were extra innings relief appearances. He was the last option in the pen, which isn’t very good.

  163. RadioKev March 15th, 2012 at 1:15 pm

    What’s the average average leverage index for a long man?

  164. GreenBeret7 March 15th, 2012 at 1:16 pm

    So, Stuckley, you’re now against having anyone one here above your age of 15? Do you feel threatened by them? It seems like there are a few jackasses on here like that. Strangely, almost all seem to be the illegitimate children of Bill James. Perhaps it’s you that should find a site that caters to your age group…like Romper Room.

  165. Jerkface March 15th, 2012 at 1:19 pm

    What’s the average average leverage index for a long man?

    Probably not very high. Which is part of the reason why using him for so few innings on the year AND in such low leverage isn’t a good idea. He didn’t do many long man type things, he made lots of 1 IP outings. But he wasn’t utilized like Aceves.

  166. trisha - true pinstriped blue March 15th, 2012 at 2:16 pm

    “so perhaps you’re just thinking about similar posters such as yourself, rather than people that are actually looking forward to prospects who do this pretend 180 to then hate them.”

    WRONG.

    “Because I’ve seen no compelling evidence that the latter exists”

    Which of course in your mind means that it couldn’t exist.

    “Chances are, the people that were kicking Melancon when he was down were not cheering for him to get a shot in the first place.”

    WRONG.

    Anything else you want to get wrong?

  167. CLejbQC July 30th, 2014 at 4:13 am

    buy tramadol cheap has bought tramadol online – tramadol dosage for 10lb dog

  168. jiXmeDhWy August 3rd, 2014 at 9:02 am

    helpful resources tramadol canadian pharmacy no prescription – withdrawal symptoms of tramadol

  169. look at this site August 7th, 2014 at 4:55 pm

    I simply want to mention I am beginner to blogs and really savored your page. More than likely I’m going to bookmark your site . You actually have fantastic well written articles. With thanks for revealing your webpage.

  170. Alberto Peng August 9th, 2014 at 11:32 am

    Hello there, You’ve done an incredible job. I’ll definitely digg it and personally recommend to my friends. I am confident they will be benefited from this web site.

  171. Aundrea Trombley August 9th, 2014 at 12:50 pm

    Nice blog here! Also your site loads up fast! What web host are you using? Can I get your affiliate link to your host? I wish my site loaded up as fast as yours lol

  172. Rene Berkebile August 9th, 2014 at 3:24 pm

    I think this is among the most significant information for me. And i am glad reading your article. But want to remark on few general things, The website style is ideal, the articles is really great : D. Good job, cheers

  173. Digna Scarlett August 9th, 2014 at 7:11 pm

    Wonderful beat ! I would like to apprentice while you amend your site, how could i subscribe for a blog website? The account helped me a acceptable deal. I had been a little bit acquainted of this your broadcast provided bright clear idea

  174. Katy Faber August 9th, 2014 at 8:45 pm

    I am not sure where you are getting your information, but good topic. I needs to spend some time learning more or understanding more. Thanks for fantastic info I was looking for this information for my mission.

  175. go to the website August 9th, 2014 at 10:18 pm

    This is getting a bit more subjective, but I much prefer the Zune Marketplace. The interface is colorful, has more flair, and some cool features like ‘Mixview’ that let you quickly see related albums, songs, or other users related to what you’re listening to. Clicking on one of those will center on that item, and another set of “neighbors” will come into view, allowing you to navigate around exploring by similar artists, songs, or users. Speaking of users, the Zune “Social” is also great fun, letting you find others with shared tastes and becoming friends with them. You then can listen to a playlist created based on an amalgamation of what all your friends are listening to, which is also enjoyable. Those concerned with privacy will be relieved to know you can prevent the public from seeing your personal listening habits if you so choose.

  176. Len Chatfield August 9th, 2014 at 11:33 pm

    http://cialisonlinefsc.com

  177. good website August 10th, 2014 at 12:50 am

    Between me and my husband we’ve owned more MP3 players over the years than I can count, including Sansas, iRivers, iPods (classic & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etc. But, the last few years I’ve settled down to one line of players. Why? Because I was happy to discover how well-designed and fun to use the underappreciated (and widely mocked) Zunes are.

  178. Bethany Menuey August 10th, 2014 at 1:06 am

    I have been browsing online more than 3 hours today, yet I never found any interesting article like yours. It is pretty worth enough for me. Personally, if all site owners and bloggers made good content as you did, the internet will be a lot more useful than ever before.

  179. Larhonda Pulliam August 10th, 2014 at 2:23 am

    I don’t even know how I ended up here, but I thought this post was great. I do not know who you are but definitely you are going to a famous blogger if you aren’t already ;) Cheers!

  180. Leif Malkiewicz August 10th, 2014 at 4:13 am

    http://cheapviagradsc.com

  181. Korey Kutsch August 10th, 2014 at 6:58 am

    I do not even know how I ended up here, but I thought this post was great. I do not know who you are but definitely you are going to a famous blogger if you aren’t already ;) Cheers!

  182. browse content August 10th, 2014 at 8:17 am

    I was very pleased to find this site. I wanted to thank you for your time just for this wonderful read!! I definitely really liked every little bit of it and I have you saved to fav to check out new information in your website.

  183. Rikki Mccaa August 10th, 2014 at 8:41 am

    http://www.girlscoutwebworks.com

  184. browse content August 10th, 2014 at 10:50 am

    You should take part in a contest for one of the finest websites on the internet. I most certainly will highly recommend this website!

  185. Lyndon Owens August 10th, 2014 at 11:36 am

    Hi there, just became alert to your blog through Google, and found that it is truly informative. I am gonna watch out for brussels. I will appreciate if you continue this in future. Numerous people will be benefited from your writing. Cheers!

  186. Sheryl Rihner August 10th, 2014 at 2:30 pm

    Nearly all of the things you articulate is supprisingly precise and it makes me wonder the reason why I hadn’t looked at this in this light before. This particular article really did switch the light on for me personally as far as this particular issue goes. But there is just one position I am not necessarily too comfy with so whilst I attempt to reconcile that with the central theme of the issue, allow me observe exactly what all the rest of the subscribers have to say.Well done.

  187. Desire Khan August 10th, 2014 at 10:33 pm

    Pretty nice post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to say that I’ve really enjoyed surfing around your blog posts. In any case I will be subscribing to your feed and I hope you write again very soon!

  188. good page August 10th, 2014 at 11:54 pm

    I like reading a post that can make people think. Also, thanks for permitting me to comment!

  189. Ryan Semien August 11th, 2014 at 2:01 am

    I love your blog.. very nice colors & theme. Did you design this website yourself or did you hire someone to do it for you? Plz respond as I’m looking to design my own blog and would like to find out where u got this from. appreciate it

  190. Rocco Mcthay August 11th, 2014 at 7:22 am

    I’m not that much of a online reader to be honest but your blogs really nice, keep it up! I’ll go ahead and bookmark your website to come back later on. Cheers

  191. Tiesha Trumm August 11th, 2014 at 7:37 am

    http://www.imagesofindia.org

  192. Stuart Groom August 11th, 2014 at 9:01 am

    I was suggested this blog by my cousin. I am not sure whether this post is written by him as nobody else know such detailed about my trouble. You are amazing! Thanks!

  193. go to info August 11th, 2014 at 11:11 am

    It’s nearly impossible to find experienced people on this subject, but you sound like you know what you’re talking about! Thanks

  194. Bobbie Recor August 11th, 2014 at 4:07 pm

    http://www.navigatedabdominalsurgery.com

  195. read link August 11th, 2014 at 4:19 pm

    Very nice article. I certainly appreciate this website. Stick with it!

  196. discover this info here August 11th, 2014 at 6:58 pm

    The new Zune browser is surprisingly good, but not as good as the iPod’s. It works well, but isn’t as fast as Safari, and has a clunkier interface. If you occasionally plan on using the web browser that’s not an issue, but if you’re planning to browse the web alot from your PMP then the iPod’s larger screen and better browser may be important.

  197. Hayden Prudencio August 11th, 2014 at 9:38 pm

    Hello There. I found your blog using msn. This is a really well written article. I will make sure to bookmark it and come back to read more of your useful info. Thanks for the post. I will definitely return.

  198. Dustin Rattray August 12th, 2014 at 1:14 am

    http://www.genealogyarchives.us

  199. made my day August 12th, 2014 at 1:39 am

    The Zune concentrates on being a Portable Media Player. Not a web browser. Not a game machine. Maybe in the future it’ll do even better in those areas, but for now it’s a fantastic way to organize and listen to your music and videos, and is without peer in that regard. The iPod’s strengths are its web browsing and apps. If those sound more compelling, perhaps it is your best choice.

  200. Amal Figueiredo August 12th, 2014 at 5:54 am

    Hello there, I found your blog via Google while looking for a related topic, your website came up, it looks great. I’ve bookmarked it in my google bookmarks.

  201. Lincoln Maun August 12th, 2014 at 6:50 am

    http://www.sirjohn.info

  202. Traci Ezelle August 12th, 2014 at 8:21 am

    Excellent blog here! Also your web site loads up very fast! What host are you using? Can I get your affiliate link to your host? I wish my website loaded up as quickly as yours lol

  203. James Canale August 12th, 2014 at 11:02 am

    http://www.ziplines-pdx.org

  204. find out here now August 12th, 2014 at 11:07 am

    Hands down, Apple’s app store wins by a mile. It’s a huge selection of all sorts of apps vs a rather sad selection of a handful for Zune. Microsoft has plans, especially in the realm of games, but I’m not sure I’d want to bet on the future if this aspect is important to you. The iPod is a much better choice in that case.

  205. Elida Amadon August 12th, 2014 at 11:09 am

    Normally I do not read article on blogs, but I would like to say that this write-up very pressured me to try and do so! Your writing style has been surprised me. Thanks, quite nice post.

  206. Debby Minns August 12th, 2014 at 1:11 pm

    Fantastic goods from you, man. I’ve understand your stuff previous to and you are just extremely fantastic. I really like what you have acquired here, really like what you’re stating and the way in which you say it. You make it enjoyable and you still care for to keep it wise. I cant wait to read much more from you. This is actually a terrific site.

  207. Lilli Campos August 12th, 2014 at 3:56 pm

    This design is steller! You obviously know how to keep a reader amused. Between your wit and your videos, I was almost moved to start my own blog (well, almost…HaHa!) Wonderful job. I really loved what you had to say, and more than that, how you presented it. Too cool!

  208. Gabriel Riendeau August 12th, 2014 at 9:05 pm

    Heya i’m for the first time here. I came across this board and I find It truly useful & it helped me out much. I hope to give something back and aid others like you aided me.

  209. Dallas Toussand August 12th, 2014 at 11:54 pm

    I am extremely impressed together with your writing skills and also with the layout on your blog. Is this a paid subject or did you modify it yourself? Either way stay up the excellent high quality writing, it is uncommon to look a great blog like this one nowadays..

  210. Sanford Drivers August 13th, 2014 at 12:50 am

    http://genericcialisdsb.com

  211. Garry Vijayan August 13th, 2014 at 2:13 am

    I am extremely impressed with your writing skills as well as with the layout on your weblog. Is this a paid theme or did you customize it yourself? Anyway keep up the nice quality writing, it is rare to see a nice blog like this one today..

  212. Jarod Apela August 13th, 2014 at 5:00 am

    Hey There. I found your weblog the usage of msn. That is a really neatly written article. I’ll make sure to bookmark it and return to learn extra of your useful info. Thanks for the post. I will certainly comeback.

  213. Ivan Winders August 13th, 2014 at 9:17 am

    Wonderful goods from you, man. I have understand your stuff previous to and you are just too fantastic. I really like what you have acquired here, certainly like what you’re saying and the way in which you say it. You make it enjoyable and you still care for to keep it wise. I cant wait to read much more from you. This is actually a wonderful site.

  214. Jeffry Weigold August 13th, 2014 at 9:37 am

    http://www.ieee-sd.net

  215. Adam Bosack August 13th, 2014 at 12:02 pm

    Valuable information. Lucky me I found your website by accident, and I’m shocked why this accident did not happened earlier! I bookmarked it.

  216. Shuron August 13th, 2014 at 3:45 pm

    English not my native language.Of course, what a fantastic blog and illuminating posts, I definitely will bookmark your site.All the Best!

  217. Brendon Bagger August 13th, 2014 at 9:58 pm

    Just desire to say your article is as surprising. The clarity in your post is just great and i can assume you are an expert on this subject. Fine with your permission let me to grab your feed to keep up to date with forthcoming post. Thanks a million and please keep up the enjoyable work.

  218. Rueben Yeropoli August 14th, 2014 at 12:12 am

    I think this is one of the most significant information for me. And i’m glad reading your article. But wanna remark on some general things, The website style is wonderful, the articles is really excellent : D. Good job, cheers

  219. Hobert Pafel August 14th, 2014 at 12:44 am

    Just want to say your article is as amazing. The clarity in your post is simply spectacular and that i could assume you are an expert in this subject. Fine along with your permission let me to snatch your feed to stay updated with coming near near post. Thank you one million and please continue the rewarding work.

  220. Samuel Grizzle August 14th, 2014 at 1:38 am

    http://www.lets-talk-human-development.com

  221. Dustin Mcmonagle August 14th, 2014 at 6:02 am

    I think this is among the most vital info for me. And i am glad reading your article. But should remark on few general things, The website style is great, the articles is really great : D. Good job, cheers

  222. Eldon Rzucidlo August 14th, 2014 at 6:20 am

    http://www.cfvancouver.org

  223. Aaron Reyolds August 14th, 2014 at 6:41 am

    hello!,I like your writing so much! share we communicate more about your post on AOL? I need an expert on this area to solve my problem. May be that’s you! Looking forward to see you.

  224. Von Stengle August 14th, 2014 at 8:18 am

    Great post. I was checking continuously this blog and I’m impressed! Extremely helpful information specifically the last part :) I care for such information a lot. I was looking for this certain information for a long time. Thank you and best of luck.

  225. Herman Fure August 14th, 2014 at 9:52 am

    http://www.ecologyinaction.org

  226. Kirk Pelo August 14th, 2014 at 11:46 am

    I’ve been browsing online more than three hours today, yet I never found any interesting article like yours. It is pretty worth enough for me. In my view, if all site owners and bloggers made good content as you did, the internet will be much more useful than ever before.

  227. Wenona Lawrey August 14th, 2014 at 1:31 pm

    Hey There. I found your blog using msn. This is a very well written article. I will be sure to bookmark it and return to read more of your useful info. Thanks for the post. I will certainly return.

  228. Lavona Alspaugh August 14th, 2014 at 1:46 pm

    http://viagraonlinefsb.com

  229. Mamie Sozzi August 14th, 2014 at 2:11 pm

    Would you be interested by exchanging hyperlinks?

  230. Krishna Kellem August 14th, 2014 at 3:51 pm

    Its like you read my mind! You seem to know a lot about this, like you wrote the book in it or something. I think that you can do with some pics to drive the message home a bit, but instead of that, this is excellent blog. A fantastic read. I will certainly be back.

  231. Yasmin Vallimont August 14th, 2014 at 9:46 pm

    http://cialisonlinefsc.com

  232. Kari Galaska August 18th, 2014 at 10:45 pm

    Nice read, I just passed this onto a friend who was doing some research on that. And he just bought me lunch as I found it for him smile So let me rephrase that: Thank you for lunch!

  233. Jamar Chynoweth August 18th, 2014 at 11:05 pm

    Everything is very open with a clear description of the challenges. It was definitely informative. Your website is very helpful. Many thanks for sharing!

  234. Mitch Mcclour August 18th, 2014 at 11:28 pm

    Magnificent beat ! I would like to apprentice while you amend your website, how could i subscribe for a blog web site? The account helped me a acceptable deal. I had been a little bit acquainted of this your broadcast provided bright clear concept

  235. Sherryl Hedden August 19th, 2014 at 4:03 am

    My coder is trying to convince me to move to .net from PHP. I have always disliked the idea because of the expenses. But he’s tryiong none the less. I’ve been using Movable-type on various websites for about a year and am anxious about switching to another platform. I have heard fantastic things about blogengine.net. Is there a way I can transfer all my wordpress content into it? Any kind of help would be greatly appreciated!

  236. Karl Summerfield August 19th, 2014 at 11:14 am

    F*ckin’ amazing things here. I’m very glad to see your post. Thanks a lot and i am looking forward to contact you. Will you please drop me a mail?

  237. Levi Hardter August 19th, 2014 at 11:56 am

    Hi there, just became aware of your blog through Google, and found that it is really informative. I am going to watch out for brussels. I’ll be grateful if you continue this in future. Many people will be benefited from your writing. Cheers!

  238. India Edghill August 19th, 2014 at 2:50 pm

    I don’t even know how I ended up here, but I thought this post was great. I do not know who you are but definitely you’re going to a famous blogger if you are not already ;) Cheers!

  239. Dominic Emde August 19th, 2014 at 10:00 pm

    Wow, awesome blog layout! How long have you been blogging for? you make blogging look easy. The overall look of your site is great, as well as the content!

  240. Kiana Mccullen August 19th, 2014 at 10:38 pm

    You’ve made some really good points there. I checked on the internet for additional information about the issue and found most individuals will go along with your views on this website.

  241. Trenton Suminski August 19th, 2014 at 11:02 pm

    You actually make it seem so easy with your presentation but I find this matter to be really something which I think I would never understand. It seems too complicated and extremely broad for me. I am looking forward for your next post, I will try to get the hang of it!

  242. Taina Seaburn August 20th, 2014 at 12:17 am

    I as well as my buddies were found to be studying the good hints on the website and then quickly got an awful feeling I had not expressed respect to the blog owner for those secrets. All the young men are actually certainly thrilled to study them and now have unquestionably been taking pleasure in those things. I appreciate you for actually being so considerate as well as for deciding upon such very good areas millions of individuals are really desperate to learn about. Our honest apologies for not saying thanks to you earlier.

  243. Drew Weniger August 20th, 2014 at 2:05 am

    I like the valuable info you provide in your articles. I will bookmark your blog and check again here regularly. I’m quite sure I’ll learn many new stuff right here! Good luck for the next!

  244. Eli Mcluen August 20th, 2014 at 4:45 am

    When I initially commented I clicked the -Notify me when new feedback are added- checkbox and now each time a remark is added I get four emails with the identical comment. Is there any manner you’ll be able to take away me from that service? Thanks!

  245. Houston Navaretta August 20th, 2014 at 5:09 am

    I am usually to running a blog and i really appreciate your content. The article has actually peaks my interest. I’m going to bookmark your website and hold checking for new information.

  246. Annemarie Papin August 20th, 2014 at 5:27 am

    This is the right web site for anyone who wishes to understand this topic. You know so much its almost hard to argue with you (not that I really will need to…HaHa). You certainly put a brand new spin on a subject that’s been discussed for many years. Wonderful stuff, just wonderful!

  247. Aracely Tycer August 20th, 2014 at 5:39 am

    Hi! I just want to give you a big thumbs up for the great information you’ve got here on this post. I am returning to your website for more soon.

  248. Mona Gillerist August 20th, 2014 at 5:51 am

    Wonderful goods from you, man. I’ve understand your stuff previous to and you’re just extremely fantastic. I really like what you’ve acquired here, really like what you are stating and the way in which you say it. You make it entertaining and you still care for to keep it wise. I can’t wait to read far more from you. This is really a great web site.

  249. Lemuel Truglia August 20th, 2014 at 8:49 am

    Hello there, I found your blog via Google while searching for a related topic, your site came up, it looks good. I have bookmarked it in my google bookmarks.

  250. Korey Bonomo August 20th, 2014 at 9:17 am

    wonderful submit, very informative. I wonder why the other specialists of this sector do not understand this. You should proceed your writing. I am confident, you have a huge readers’ base already!

  251. Oretha Goddard August 20th, 2014 at 9:36 am

    This excellent website definitely has all of the info I needed about this subject and didn’t know who to ask.

  252. Teri Jentzsch August 20th, 2014 at 10:00 am

    Hi there, just became aware of your blog through Google, and found that it’s truly informative. I’m going to watch out for brussels. I’ll be grateful if you continue this in future. A lot of people will be benefited from your writing. Cheers!

  253. kd sneakers August 20th, 2014 at 2:28 pm

    A brace of admirable red sole heels top heels will accomplish your activity abounding of absorbing and vitality.

  254. Jasmin Stordahl August 20th, 2014 at 2:58 pm

    I love what you guys are usually up too. This kind of clever work and coverage! Keep up the fantastic works guys I’ve incorporated you guys to my personal blogroll.

  255. Lawerence Dalby August 20th, 2014 at 3:44 pm

    I absolutely love your website.. Great colors & theme. Did you make this website yourself? Please reply back as I’m hoping to create my own personal website and would like to find out where you got this from or just what the theme is called. Many thanks!

  256. Cornelius Roediger August 20th, 2014 at 4:09 pm

    Hi there, You’ve done a fantastic job. I’ll certainly digg it and personally recommend to my friends. I am confident they’ll be benefited from this web site.

  257. Jessie Grossnickle August 20th, 2014 at 6:23 pm

    Greetings from Carolina! I’m bored to tears at work so I decided to browse your blog on my iphone during lunch break. I really like the info you provide here and can’t wait to take a look when I get home. I’m amazed at how fast your blog loaded on my phone .. I’m not even using WIFI, just 3G .. Anyhow, superb site!

  258. Ingrid Wills August 20th, 2014 at 7:29 pm

    I don’t even know how I ended up here, but I thought this post was great. I do not know who you are but certainly you’re going to a famous blogger if you aren’t already ;) Cheers!

  259. Wilford Tanguay August 20th, 2014 at 10:55 pm

    I and also my friends came reading through the excellent tips and tricks on your web blog while all of a sudden I had a terrible feeling I never thanked the web blog owner for those strategies. Most of the ladies happened to be totally glad to read all of them and now have very much been making the most of these things. Appreciate your actually being so accommodating and also for obtaining this form of amazing subject matter millions of individuals are really desperate to understand about. My personal honest regret for not expressing gratitude to sooner.

  260. Vince Kurihara August 20th, 2014 at 11:27 pm

    Hey! This is my first visit to your blog! We are a group of volunteers and starting a new initiative in a community in the same niche. Your blog provided us valuable information to work on. You have done a outstanding job!

  261. Yasmin Manlangit August 20th, 2014 at 11:47 pm

    Hi there! This blog post couldn’t be written much better! Looking at this article reminds me of my previous roommate! He always kept preaching about this. I am going to forward this information to him. Fairly certain he will have a good read. I appreciate you for sharing!

  262. Hung Winson August 21st, 2014 at 12:00 am

    Hello, I do think your web site might be having browser compatibility problems. When I take a look at your blog in Safari, it looks fine however, when opening in IE, it has some overlapping issues. I just wanted to give you a quick heads up! Other than that, great site!

  263. Hayden Prudencio August 21st, 2014 at 12:11 am

    Heya i’m for the first time here. I came across this board and I find It really useful & it helped me out a lot. I hope to give something back and aid others like you helped me.

  264. way to lose weight August 26th, 2014 at 9:27 pm

    I’d need to consult you here. Which is not some thing It’s my job to do! I spend time reading an write-up that may get folks to feel. Also, several thanks for permitting me to comment!

  265. infertility forum August 27th, 2014 at 3:29 am

    Maybe it could be any number of other things including early menopause. Suggest every detail of your physical condition to the doctor and then go for particular remedy. Illicit Drug Use: Drugs, such as cocaine, heroin, and ecstasy have all been shown to have dramatic affects on male and female fertility. These groups often provide a safe forum where women and couples can discuss the problems they’re having and be comfortable belonging to a group of people many of people who have experience similar problems to their own. The success rate of using medicines to fix this ovulation problem is around 80%. Get more info at InfertilityCure.tk

  266. xxx Sex Services August 27th, 2014 at 10:55 am

    Very intriguing topic , appreciate it for putting up.

  267. go to this site August 27th, 2014 at 7:19 pm

    I simply want to tell you that I’m newbie to blogs and seriously enjoyed you’re website. Probably I’m planning to bookmark your blog . You definitely come with beneficial article content. Appreciate it for revealing your website page.

  268. Mayweather vs Maidana 2 August 28th, 2014 at 12:13 am

    I wanted to say Appreciate providing these details, youre performing an excellent job with the internet site…

  269. jim ellis mazda August 28th, 2014 at 12:40 am

    I dont leave a lot of comments on lots of blogs each week but i felt i had to here. Do you need to have a lot of drafts to make a post?

  270. ejakulation August 28th, 2014 at 4:21 am

    Hi, ich habe Ihre Webseite bei der Suche nach Fernbus Hamburg im Internet gefunden. Schauen Sie doch mal auf meiner Seite vorbei, ich habe dort viele Testberichte zu den aktuellen Windeleimern geschrieben.

  271. pre owned certified cars August 28th, 2014 at 6:47 am

    I admire your function , regards for all of the beneficial blog posts.

  272. physics chemistry biology tutor August 28th, 2014 at 11:07 am

    I like this weblog so significantly, saved to fav.

  273. Over The Counter Fertility Drugs August 28th, 2014 at 1:33 pm

    Maybe it could be any number of other things including early menopause. This sect also believes that embryo donations are acceptable if they were created from another married couple. Follow up treatment is key, particularly if you are placed on medication, as your dosage will need to be carefully evaluated over time. Moreover there are other options like egg donor, sperm donors and surrogate mothers as well that can eradicate the problems of infertility. Since you know this, you should bypass it whenever you shop there. Get more info at InfertilityCure.tk

  274. dome security camera August 28th, 2014 at 4:15 pm

    i could only wish that solar panels cost only several hundred dollars, i would enjoy to fill my roof with solar panels-

  275. chicago car dealerships August 28th, 2014 at 5:35 pm

    There are a couple of intriguing points at some point in this posting but I do not determine if them all center to heart. There is definitely some validity but I will take hold opinion until I take a look at it further. Very good write-up , thanks and that we want a good deal a lot more! Combined with FeedBurner in addition

  276. spider pest control August 28th, 2014 at 9:17 pm

    Appropriate wow messages are bound to show your and supply memorialize the speacial couple. Beginner sound system to high in volume crowds really should always take a appear at all of the amazing value behind presenting and public speaking, which is to be someone’s truck. best man speeches brother

  277. candle scented August 29th, 2014 at 3:17 am

    Can I just say what a relief to search out somebody who truly is aware of what theyre speaking about on the internet. You undoubtedly know how to deliver a dilemma to light and make it critical. Extra folks need to learn this and perceive this facet of the story. I cant consider youre no far more common because you positively have the gift.

  278. attorney malpractice August 29th, 2014 at 4:54 am

    Some genuinely nice and helpful info on this website , besides I believe the style contains amazing functions.

  279. Links August 30th, 2014 at 3:09 am

    Good write-up, I am normal visitor of one’s blog, maintain up the excellent operate, and It’s going to be a regular visitor for a long time.

  280. Truvisage Ingredients August 30th, 2014 at 5:00 pm

    all we want is of course a firm skin which is very smooth. good skin comes with fantastic genetics and proper maintennance`

  281. www.aachenerschluesseldienst.de August 30th, 2014 at 8:54 pm

    This is genuinely thrilling, You are an awfully skilled short article writer. I’ve signed up along with your feed furthermore appear forward to enjoying your individual fabulous write-ups. What’s more, We’ve shared your sites all through our myspace.

  282. good info August 31st, 2014 at 8:03 pm

    Szumski@gmail.com

  283. I was reading this August 31st, 2014 at 8:37 pm

    Dedios@gmail.com

  284. Elton Bank August 31st, 2014 at 9:27 pm

    I have been absent for some time, but now I remember why I used to love this site. Thanks, I’ll try and check back more often. How frequently you update your website?

  285. Marcela Linnert September 1st, 2014 at 1:54 am

    Perfectly written content material, Really enjoyed reading.

  286. vegan September 1st, 2014 at 2:13 am

    It’s difficult to acquire knowledgeable men and women within this subject, and you can be seen as you know what you are dealing with! Thanks

  287. Bud Vegar September 1st, 2014 at 7:02 am

    I really wanted to compose a small note to be able to appreciate you for these lovely solutions you are writing on this website. My extended internet research has at the end been recognized with beneficial suggestions to go over with my friends and family. I ‘d repeat that most of us visitors actually are definitely blessed to exist in a really good community with many perfect professionals with very helpful things. I feel very much privileged to have used the webpage and look forward to really more brilliant minutes reading here. Thank you once more for everything.

  288. Ramon Hegyi September 1st, 2014 at 7:36 am

    I conceive you have observed some very interesting details , thankyou for the post.

  289. SPC Angel Login September 1st, 2014 at 9:44 am

    I discovered your weblog post internet website on the search engines and appearance several of your early posts. Always preserve the top notch operate. I additional the Feed to my MSN News Reader. Seeking forward to reading a lot a lot more on your part down the line!…

  290. anti malware reviews 2014 September 1st, 2014 at 10:51 am

    Needed to create you the very small observation to say thanks a lot yet again for those great things you’ve discussed at this time. It was quite unbelievably generous of people like you to give extensively what numerous people could have advertised for an e book to get some cash for themselves, chiefly since you could possibly have done it if you considered necessary. The good ideas additionally served like a easy way to know that other individuals have similar desire similar to mine to know the truth a great deal more with regard to this issue. Certainly there are millions of more pleasant times ahead for those who read carefully your site.

  291. like it September 1st, 2014 at 4:14 pm

    Pounders@gmail.com

  292. Dinah Melhorn September 1st, 2014 at 7:25 pm

    you are really a good webmaster. The website loading speed is incredible. It seems that you are doing any distinctive trick. Moreover, The contents are masterpiece. you have done a fantastic task on this subject!

  293. http://www.golfbargainau.com/Callaway-X2-Hot-Irons-328.html September 1st, 2014 at 7:30 pm

    Officials did not have any immediate reports of anyone hurt or significant damage. Part of the roof of an convenience store in Sugar Land collapsed.

  294. Celena Tilt September 1st, 2014 at 7:56 pm

    I think this web site holds some real good info for everyone. “The foundation of every state is the education of its youth.” by Diogenes.

  295. Mauro Holub September 1st, 2014 at 11:27 pm

    I together with my buddies were analyzing the best secrets from your web site then before long developed an awful suspicion I had not thanked the web site owner for those secrets. All the boys ended up totally glad to read all of them and already have certainly been having fun with them. I appreciate you for turning out to be really considerate and then for having certain smart tips millions of individuals are really desperate to be informed on. Our sincere apologies for not expressing appreciation to you earlier.

  296. go to link September 1st, 2014 at 11:51 pm

    Olivio@gmail.com

  297. Joel Orlowski September 2nd, 2014 at 12:01 am

    I’m still learning from you, as I’m making my way to the top as well. I definitely love reading everything that is written on your website.Keep the tips coming. I loved it!

  298. Gilbert Delaughter September 2nd, 2014 at 5:05 am

    Its wonderful as your other blog posts : D, regards for putting up. “Slump I ain’t in no slump… I just ain’t hitting.” by Yogi Berra.

  299. Kizzie Bueckers September 2nd, 2014 at 5:41 am

    You have observed very interesting details! ps decent site.

  300. he has a good point September 2nd, 2014 at 8:44 am

    Sade@gmail.com

  301. Diedre Argenbright September 2nd, 2014 at 9:20 am

    Good – I should certainly pronounce, impressed with your website. I had no trouble navigating through all tabs and related information ended up being truly simple to do to access. I recently found what I hoped for before you know it in the least. Quite unusual. Is likely to appreciate it for those who add forums or anything, site theme . a tones way for your client to communicate. Excellent task.

  302. Noreen Kollmorgen September 2nd, 2014 at 9:54 am

    I’ll right away snatch your rss as I can not find your e-mail subscription link or e-newsletter service. Do you’ve any? Please allow me recognise so that I may subscribe. Thanks.

  303. Eliana September 2nd, 2014 at 11:24 am

    Fantastic web site colleague. Love it if more envision you does similar to my own previous content on top of as colour t shirt note printing australia. Thanks!!

  304. read post September 2nd, 2014 at 1:11 pm

    Loven@gmail.com

Leave a comment below


Sponsored by:
 

Search

    Advertisement

    Follow

    Mobile

    Read The LoHud Yankees Blog on the go by navigating to the blog on your smartphone or mobile device's browser. No apps or downloads are required.

Advertisement

Place an ad

Call (914) 694-3581